158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37690282)
1. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy vs. Robotic assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Marchand G; Taher Masoud A; Abdelsattar A; King A; Brazil G; Ulibarri H; Parise J; Arroyo A; Coriell C; Goetz S; Moir C; Baruelo G; Govindan M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Oct; 289():190-202. PubMed ID: 37690282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, excluding robotic assisted versus open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Marchand G; Masoud AT; Abdelsattar A; King A; Ulibarri H; Parise J; Arroyo A; Coriell C; Goetz S; Moir C; Moberly A; Govindan M
Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):273. PubMed ID: 36609438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Shazly SA; Murad MH; Dowdy SC; Gostout BS; Famuyide AO
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Aug; 138(2):457-71. PubMed ID: 26056752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic radical hysterectomy is superior to laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
Jin YM; Liu SS; Chen J; Chen YN; Ren CC
PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193033. PubMed ID: 29554090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy of robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer compared with that of open and laparoscopic surgery: A separate meta-analysis of high-quality studies.
Zhang SS; Ding T; Cui ZH; Lv Y; Jiang RA
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jan; 98(4):e14171. PubMed ID: 30681582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy and safety outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy in Chinese older women with cervical cancer compared with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.
Luo C; Liu M; Li X
BMC Womens Health; 2018 May; 18(1):61. PubMed ID: 29716555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic vs laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a meta-analysis.
Zhou J; Xiong BH; Ma L; Cheng Y; Huang W; Zhao L
Int J Med Robot; 2016 Mar; 12(1):145-54. PubMed ID: 25823530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients: a matched-case comparative study.
Kim TH; Choi CH; Choi JK; Yoon A; Lee YY; Kim TJ; Lee JW; Bae DS; Kim BG
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Oct; 24(8):1466-73. PubMed ID: 25207462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a case control study.
Vizza E; Corrado G; Mancini E; Vici P; Sergi D; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Pomati G; Cutillo G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 24063966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of survival outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic radical hysterectomies for early-stage cervical cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis.
Hwang JH; Kim B
J Gynecol Oncol; 2024 Jan; 35(1):e9. PubMed ID: 37857564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Survival rate comparisons amongst cervical cancer patients treated with an open, robotic-assisted or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: A five year experience.
Mendivil AA; Rettenmaier MA; Abaid LN; Brown JV; Micha JP; Lopez KL; Goldstein BH
Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 25(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 26409687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of conventional laparoscopy and robotic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A meta-analysis.
Hao X; Han S; Wang Y
J Cancer Res Ther; 2015 Nov; 11 Suppl():C258-64. PubMed ID: 26612449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative analysis of robotic
Chen L; Liu LP; Wen N; Qiao X; Meng YG
World J Clin Cases; 2019 Oct; 7(20):3185-3193. PubMed ID: 31667168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Population-Based Study of Adoption and Immediate Postoperative Outcomes in the United States.
Piedimonte S; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Gotlieb W; Abenhaim HA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):551-557. PubMed ID: 30195078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patterns of recurrence and survival after abdominal versus laparoscopic/robotic radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer.
Kong TW; Chang SJ; Piao X; Paek J; Lee Y; Lee EJ; Chun M; Ryu HS
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Jan; 42(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 26554751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radical hysterectomy: a comparison of surgical approaches after adoption of robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology.
Soliman PT; Frumovitz M; Sun CC; Dos Reis R; Schmeler KM; Nick AM; Westin SN; Brown J; Levenback CF; Ramirez PT
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Nov; 123(2):333-6. PubMed ID: 21872911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the Long-Term Oncological Outcomes Between the Initial Learning Period of Robotic and the Experienced Period of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.
Chong GO; Lee YH; Lee HJ; Hong DG; Lee YS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 Feb; 28(2):226-232. PubMed ID: 29303929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Robotic and laparoscopic Radical type-B and C hysterectomy for cervical cancer: Long term-outcomes.
Pellegrino A; Damiani GR; Loverro M; Pirovano C; Fachechi G; Corso S; Trojano G
Acta Biomed; 2017 Oct; 88(3):289-296. PubMed ID: 29083333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surgical outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy using three robotic arms versus conventional multiport laparoscopy in patients with cervical cancer.
Yim GW; Kim SW; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim HJ; Kim YT
Yonsei Med J; 2014 Sep; 55(5):1222-30. PubMed ID: 25048478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Successful patient-oriented surgical outcomes in robotic vs laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer - a systematic review.
Waters PS; Cheung FP; Peacock O; Heriot AG; Warrier SK; O'Riordain DS; Pillinger S; Lynch AC; Stevenson ARL
Colorectal Dis; 2020 May; 22(5):488-499. PubMed ID: 31400185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
