BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37690282)

  • 21. Successful patient-oriented surgical outcomes in robotic vs laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer - a systematic review.
    Waters PS; Cheung FP; Peacock O; Heriot AG; Warrier SK; O'Riordain DS; Pillinger S; Lynch AC; Stevenson ARL
    Colorectal Dis; 2020 May; 22(5):488-499. PubMed ID: 31400185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.
    Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Robotic-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy Results in Better Surgical Outcomes Compared With the Traditional Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Cervical Cancer.
    Nie JC; Yan AQ; Liu XS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Nov; 27(9):1990-1999. PubMed ID: 28858908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Laparoscopic, robotic and open method of radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A systematic review.
    Geetha P; Nair MK
    J Minim Access Surg; 2012 Jul; 8(3):67-73. PubMed ID: 22837592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy Is Not Superior to Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Perioperative Urologic Complications: A Meta-Analysis of 23 Studies.
    Hwang JH; Kim BW; Kim SR; Kim JH
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 31315060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Survival outcomes of abdominal radical hysterectomy, laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and vaginal radical hysterectomy approaches for early-stage cervical cancer: a retrospective study.
    Zhang N; Jin X; Yang W; Gu C; Li L; Xu J; Tang Q; Fan W; Meng Y
    World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jul; 21(1):197. PubMed ID: 37403056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Analysis of abdominal vs. robotic radical hysterectomies for patients with cervical cancer: a Bulgarian experience.
    Gorchev GA; Tomov ST; Kiprova DK; Lyubenov AD; Hinkova N; Tomova VD; Ahmad S
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Apr; 16(2):339-352. PubMed ID: 33913085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Early Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Zhao Y; Hang B; Xiong GW; Zhang XW
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2017 Nov; 27(11):1132-1144. PubMed ID: 28300465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of the complications between minimally invasive surgery and open surgical treatments for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Li Y; Kong Q; Wei H; Wang Y
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0253143. PubMed ID: 34197466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A single-center study.
    Oyama K; Kanno K; Kojima R; Shirane A; Yanai S; Ota Y; Andou M
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Feb; 45(2):405-411. PubMed ID: 30426602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer stage IB1.
    Kim SI; Yoo JG; Lee SJ; Park DC; Yoon JH
    Int J Med Sci; 2023; 20(3):287-291. PubMed ID: 36860680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
    Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Survival After Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Nitecki R; Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M; Krause KJ; Tergas AI; Wright JD; Rauh-Hain JA; Melamed A
    JAMA Oncol; 2020 Jul; 6(7):1019-1027. PubMed ID: 32525511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer.
    Nezhat FR; Datta MS; Liu C; Chuang L; Zakashansky K
    JSLS; 2008; 12(3):227-37. PubMed ID: 18765043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Analgesic and antiemetic requirements after minimally invasive surgery for early cervical cancer: a comparison between laparoscopy and robotic surgery.
    Soliman PT; Langley G; Munsell MF; Vaniya HA; Frumovitz M; Ramirez PT
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Apr; 20(4):1355-9. PubMed ID: 23054117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Concurrent Learning Curves of 3-Dimensional and Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Using 2-Dimensional Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy as a Benchmark: A Single Surgeon's Experience.
    Ding D; Jiang H; Nie J; Liu X; Guo SW
    Med Sci Monit; 2019 Aug; 25():5903-5919. PubMed ID: 31392971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Robot-assisted versus open radical hysterectomy: A multi-institutional experience for early-stage cervical cancer.
    Sert BM; Boggess JF; Ahmad S; Jackson AL; Stavitzski NM; Dahl AA; Holloway RW
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Apr; 42(4):513-22. PubMed ID: 26843445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: a comparative study at a single institution.
    Ko EM; Muto MG; Berkowitz RS; Feltmate CM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 18929400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of modified radical laparoscopic hysterectomy versus open radical hysterectomy on short-term clinical outcomes in early-stage cervical cancer: a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial.
    Lv X; Ding B; Xu J; Shen Y
    World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jun; 21(1):167. PubMed ID: 37270549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.