BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37690911)

  • 1. Artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection in screening mammography in Sweden: a prospective, population-based, paired-reader, non-inferiority study.
    Dembrower K; Crippa A; Colón E; Eklund M; Strand F;
    Lancet Digit Health; 2023 Oct; 5(10):e703-e711. PubMed ID: 37690911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Artificial intelligence-supported screen reading versus standard double reading in the Mammography Screening with Artificial Intelligence trial (MASAI): a clinical safety analysis of a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority, single-blinded, screening accuracy study.
    Lång K; Josefsson V; Larsson AM; Larsson S; Högberg C; Sartor H; Hofvind S; Andersson I; Rosso A
    Lancet Oncol; 2023 Aug; 24(8):936-944. PubMed ID: 37541274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Artificial intelligence (AI) for breast cancer screening: BreastScreen population-based cohort study of cancer detection.
    Marinovich ML; Wylie E; Lotter W; Lund H; Waddell A; Madeley C; Pereira G; Houssami N
    EBioMedicine; 2023 Apr; 90():104498. PubMed ID: 36863255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study.
    Zackrisson S; Lång K; Rosso A; Johnson K; Dustler M; Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Sartor H; Timberg P; Tingberg A; Andersson I
    Lancet Oncol; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1493-1503. PubMed ID: 30322817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. External Evaluation of 3 Commercial Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Independent Assessment of Screening Mammograms.
    Salim M; Wåhlin E; Dembrower K; Azavedo E; Foukakis T; Liu Y; Smith K; Eklund M; Strand F
    JAMA Oncol; 2020 Oct; 6(10):1581-1588. PubMed ID: 32852536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Population-wide evaluation of artificial intelligence and radiologist assessment of screening mammograms.
    Kühl J; Elhakim MT; Stougaard SW; Rasmussen BSB; Nielsen M; Gerke O; Larsen LB; Graumann O
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Jun; 34(6):3935-3946. PubMed ID: 37938386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An Artificial Intelligence-based Mammography Screening Protocol for Breast Cancer: Outcome and Radiologist Workload.
    Lauritzen AD; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; von Euler-Chelpin MC; Lynge E; Vejborg I; Nielsen M; Karssemeijer N; Lillholm M
    Radiology; 2022 Jul; 304(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 35438561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of Combined Artificial Intelligence and Radiologist Assessment to Interpret Screening Mammograms.
    Schaffter T; Buist DSM; Lee CI; Nikulin Y; Ribli D; Guan Y; Lotter W; Jie Z; Du H; Wang S; Feng J; Feng M; Kim HE; Albiol F; Albiol A; Morrell S; Wojna Z; Ahsen ME; Asif U; Jimeno Yepes A; Yohanandan S; Rabinovici-Cohen S; Yi D; Hoff B; Yu T; Chaibub Neto E; Rubin DL; Lindholm P; Margolies LR; McBride RB; Rothstein JH; Sieh W; Ben-Ari R; Harrer S; Trister A; Friend S; Norman T; Sahiner B; Strand F; Guinney J; Stolovitzky G; ; Mackey L; Cahoon J; Shen L; Sohn JH; Trivedi H; Shen Y; Buturovic L; Pereira JC; Cardoso JS; Castro E; Kalleberg KT; Pelka O; Nedjar I; Geras KJ; Nensa F; Goan E; Koitka S; Caballero L; Cox DD; Krishnaswamy P; Pandey G; Friedrich CM; Perrin D; Fookes C; Shi B; Cardoso Negrie G; Kawczynski M; Cho K; Khoo CS; Lo JY; Sorensen AG; Jung H
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Mar; 3(3):e200265. PubMed ID: 32119094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of different reading strategies implementing artificial intelligence.
    Dahlblom V; Dustler M; Tingberg A; Zackrisson S
    Eur Radiol; 2023 May; 33(5):3754-3765. PubMed ID: 36502459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of artificial intelligence-based triaging of breast cancer screening mammograms on cancer detection and radiologist workload: a retrospective simulation study.
    Dembrower K; Wåhlin E; Liu Y; Salim M; Smith K; Lindholm P; Eklund M; Strand F
    Lancet Digit Health; 2020 Sep; 2(9):e468-e474. PubMed ID: 33328114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of real-life use of artificial intelligence as support for human reading in a population-based breast cancer screening program with mammography and tomosynthesis.
    Elías-Cabot E; Romero-Martín S; Raya-Povedano JL; Brehl AK; Álvarez-Benito M
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Jun; 34(6):3958-3966. PubMed ID: 37975920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes in cancer detection and false-positive recall in mammography using artificial intelligence: a retrospective, multireader study.
    Kim HE; Kim HH; Han BK; Kim KH; Han K; Nam H; Lee EH; Kim EK
    Lancet Digit Health; 2020 Mar; 2(3):e138-e148. PubMed ID: 33334578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Possible strategies for use of artificial intelligence in screen-reading of mammograms, based on retrospective data from 122,969 screening examinations.
    Larsen M; Aglen CF; Hoff SR; Lund-Hanssen H; Hofvind S
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Dec; 32(12):8238-8246. PubMed ID: 35704111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance breast cancer screening: protocol for population-based cohort study of cancer detection.
    Marinovich ML; Wylie E; Lotter W; Pearce A; Carter SM; Lund H; Waddell A; Kim JG; Pereira GF; Lee CI; Zackrisson S; Brennan M; Houssami N
    BMJ Open; 2022 Jan; 12(1):e054005. PubMed ID: 34980622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can we reduce the workload of mammographic screening by automatic identification of normal exams with artificial intelligence? A feasibility study.
    Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Lång K; Gubern-Merida A; Teuwen J; Broeders M; Gennaro G; Clauser P; Helbich TH; Chevalier M; Mertelmeier T; Wallis MG; Andersson I; Zackrisson S; Sechopoulos I; Mann RM
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep; 29(9):4825-4832. PubMed ID: 30993432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retrospective comparison between single reading plus an artificial intelligence algorithm and two-view digital tomosynthesis with double reading in breast screening.
    Graewingholt A; Duffy S
    J Med Screen; 2021 Sep; 28(3):365-368. PubMed ID: 33402033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of artificial intelligence for image analysis in breast cancer screening programmes: systematic review of test accuracy.
    Freeman K; Geppert J; Stinton C; Todkill D; Johnson S; Clarke A; Taylor-Phillips S
    BMJ; 2021 Sep; 374():n1872. PubMed ID: 34470740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of artificial intelligence support on accuracy and reading time in breast tomosynthesis image interpretation: a multi-reader multi-case study.
    van Winkel SL; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Appelman L; Gubern-Mérida A; Karssemeijer N; Teuwen J; Wanders AJT; Sechopoulos I; Mann RM
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Nov; 31(11):8682-8691. PubMed ID: 33948701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Protocol for evaluating the fitness for purpose of an artificial intelligence product for radiology reporting in the BreastScreen New South Wales breast cancer screening programme.
    Warner-Smith M; Ren K; Mistry C; Walton R; Roder D; Bhola N; McGill S; O'Brien TA
    BMJ Open; 2024 May; 14(5):e082350. PubMed ID: 38806433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Breast cancer detection accuracy of AI in an entire screening population: a retrospective, multicentre study.
    Elhakim MT; Stougaard SW; Graumann O; Nielsen M; Lång K; Gerke O; Larsen LB; Rasmussen BSB
    Cancer Imaging; 2023 Dec; 23(1):127. PubMed ID: 38124111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.