BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37690911)

  • 21. Breast cancer detection accuracy of AI in an entire screening population: a retrospective, multicentre study.
    Elhakim MT; Stougaard SW; Graumann O; Nielsen M; Lång K; Gerke O; Larsen LB; Rasmussen BSB
    Cancer Imaging; 2023 Dec; 23(1):127. PubMed ID: 38124111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Performance of artificial intelligence in 7533 consecutive prevalent screening mammograms from the BreastScreen Australia program.
    Waugh J; Evans J; Miocevic M; Lockie D; Aminzadeh P; Lynch A; Bell RJ
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Jun; 34(6):3947-3957. PubMed ID: 37955669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.
    Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1162-70. PubMed ID: 17652282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Artificial intelligence in BreastScreen Norway: a retrospective analysis of a cancer-enriched sample including 1254 breast cancer cases.
    Koch HW; Larsen M; Bartsch H; Kurz KD; Hofvind S
    Eur Radiol; 2023 May; 33(5):3735-3743. PubMed ID: 36917260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Identifying normal mammograms in a large screening population using artificial intelligence.
    Lång K; Dustler M; Dahlblom V; Åkesson A; Andersson I; Zackrisson S
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Mar; 31(3):1687-1692. PubMed ID: 32876835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of integrating digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D-mammography on radiologists' true-positive and false-positive detection in a population screening trial: A descriptive study.
    Bernardi D; Li T; Pellegrini M; Macaskill P; Valentini M; Fantò C; Ostillio L; Houssami N
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 106():26-31. PubMed ID: 30150047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Stand-Alone Use of Artificial Intelligence for Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening: A Retrospective Evaluation.
    Romero-Martín S; Elías-Cabot E; Raya-Povedano JL; Gubern-Mérida A; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Álvarez-Benito M
    Radiology; 2022 Mar; 302(3):535-542. PubMed ID: 34904872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Differences and similarities in false interpretations by AI CAD and radiologists in screening mammography.
    Salim M; Dembrower K; Eklund M; Smith K; Strand F
    Br J Radiol; 2023 Nov; 96(1151):20230210. PubMed ID: 37660400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Improving the Performance of Radiologists Using Artificial Intelligence-Based Detection Support Software for Mammography: A Multi-Reader Study.
    Lee JH; Kim KH; Lee EH; Ahn JS; Ryu JK; Park YM; Shin GW; Kim YJ; Choi HY
    Korean J Radiol; 2022 May; 23(5):505-516. PubMed ID: 35434976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of artificial intelligence-based computer-aided diagnosis on the screening outcomes of digital mammography: a matched cohort study.
    Kim H; Choi JS; Kim K; Ko ES; Ko EY; Han BK
    Eur Radiol; 2023 Oct; 33(10):7186-7198. PubMed ID: 37188881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Impact of a Categorical AI System for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on Breast Cancer Interpretation by Both General Radiologists and Breast Imaging Specialists.
    Kim JG; Haslam B; Diab AR; Sakhare A; Grisot G; Lee H; Holt J; Lee CI; Lotter W; Sorensen AG
    Radiol Artif Intell; 2024 Mar; 6(2):e230137. PubMed ID: 38323914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Early Indicators of the Impact of Using AI in Mammography Screening for Breast Cancer.
    Lauritzen AD; Lillholm M; Lynge E; Nielsen M; Karssemeijer N; Vejborg I
    Radiology; 2024 Jun; 311(3):e232479. PubMed ID: 38832880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Use of Artificial Intelligence for Reducing Unnecessary Recalls at Screening Mammography: A Simulation Study.
    Kim YS; Jang MJ; Lee SH; Kim SY; Ha SM; Kwon BR; Moon WK; Chang JM
    Korean J Radiol; 2022 Dec; 23(12):1241-1250. PubMed ID: 36447412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Multi-vendor evaluation of artificial intelligence as an independent reader for double reading in breast cancer screening on 275,900 mammograms.
    Sharma N; Ng AY; James JJ; Khara G; Ambrózay É; Austin CC; Forrai G; Fox G; Glocker B; Heindl A; Karpati E; Rijken TM; Venkataraman V; Yearsley JE; Kecskemethy PD
    BMC Cancer; 2023 May; 23(1):460. PubMed ID: 37208717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Combining the strengths of radiologists and AI for breast cancer screening: a retrospective analysis.
    Leibig C; Brehmer M; Bunk S; Byng D; Pinker K; Umutlu L
    Lancet Digit Health; 2022 Jul; 4(7):e507-e519. PubMed ID: 35750400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. AI for interpreting screening mammograms: implications for missed cancer in double reading practices and challenging-to-locate lesions.
    Jiang Z; Gandomkar Z; Trieu PDY; Taba ST; Barron ML; Lewis SJ
    Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):11893. PubMed ID: 38789575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Breast cancer detection using single-reading of breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) compared to double-reading of 2D-mammography: Evidence from a population-based trial.
    Houssami N; Bernardi D; Pellegrini M; Valentini M; Fantò C; Ostillio L; Tuttobene P; Luparia A; Macaskill P
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 47():94-99. PubMed ID: 28192742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Women's perceptions and attitudes towards the use of AI in mammography in Sweden: a qualitative interview study.
    Viberg Johansson J; Dembrower K; Strand F; Grauman Å
    BMJ Open; 2024 Feb; 14(2):e084014. PubMed ID: 38355190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Diagnostic Performance of AI for Cancers Registered in A Mammography Screening Program: A Retrospective Analysis.
    Kizildag Yirgin I; Koyluoglu YO; Seker ME; Ozkan Gurdal S; Ozaydin AN; Ozcinar B; Cabioğlu N; Ozmen V; Aribal E
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2022; 21():15330338221075172. PubMed ID: 35060413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Artificial intelligence and radiologists in prostate cancer detection on MRI (PI-CAI): an international, paired, non-inferiority, confirmatory study.
    Saha A; Bosma JS; Twilt JJ; van Ginneken B; Bjartell A; Padhani AR; Bonekamp D; Villeirs G; Salomon G; Giannarini G; Kalpathy-Cramer J; Barentsz J; Maier-Hein KH; Rusu M; Rouvière O; van den Bergh R; Panebianco V; Kasivisvanathan V; Obuchowski NA; Yakar D; Elschot M; Veltman J; Fütterer JJ; de Rooij M; Huisman H;
    Lancet Oncol; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38876123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.