BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37690993)

  • 1. 18 F-prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography for lymph node staging in medium/high risk prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lv Z; Song L; Wang M; Hou H; Li H; Wang X; Wang J; Wang J; Liu M
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2024 Apr; 137(8):949-958. PubMed ID: 37690993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How accurate is
    Erdem S; Simsek DH; Degirmenci E; Aydin R; Bagbudar S; Ozluk Y; Sanli Y; Sanli O; Ozcan F
    Urol Oncol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):6.e1-6.e9. PubMed ID: 34400066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can
    Peng L; Li J; Meng C; Li J; You C; Tang D; Wei T; Xiong W; Li Y
    Radiat Oncol; 2020 Oct; 15(1):227. PubMed ID: 33004037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic Performance of Radiolabeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Primary Lymph Node Staging in Newly Diagnosed Intermediate to High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Kim SJ; Lee SW; Ha HK
    Urol Int; 2019; 102(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 30269140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5.
    von Eyben FE; Picchio M; von Eyben R; Rhee H; Bauman G
    Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Sep; 4(5):686-693. PubMed ID: 28753806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can Negative Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Avoid the Need for Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Patients? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis with Backup Histology as Reference Standard.
    Stabile A; Pellegrino A; Mazzone E; Cannoletta D; de Angelis M; Barletta F; Scuderi S; Cucchiara V; Gandaglia G; Raggi D; Necchi A; Karakiewicz P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Feb; 5(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 34538770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing the Staging/Restaging Performance of 68Ga-Labeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen and 18F-Choline PET/CT in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Lin CY; Lee MT; Lin CL; Kao CH
    Clin Nucl Med; 2019 May; 44(5):365-376. PubMed ID: 30888999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8.
    Zhou J; Wu R; Wang W; Zhao Y; Liu X
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2022; 25(3):297-311. PubMed ID: 36576728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
    Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10.
    Herlemann A; Wenter V; Kretschmer A; Thierfelder KM; Bartenstein P; Faber C; Gildehaus FJ; Stief CG; Gratzke C; Fendler WP
    Eur Urol; 2016 Oct; 70(4):553-557. PubMed ID: 26810345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The diagnostic accuracy of
    Rajwa P; Heidenreich J; Drzezga A; Schmidt M; Shariat SF; Heidenreich A
    Prostate; 2024 Jan; 84(1):74-78. PubMed ID: 37750292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lymph node staging with fluorine-18 prostate specific membrane antigen 1007-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in newly diagnosed intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer using histopathological evaluation of extended pelvic node dissection as reference.
    Hermsen R; Wedick EBC; Vinken MJM; van Kalmthout LWM; Küsters-Vandevelde HVN; Wijers CHW; Somford DM; van Basten JA
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Sep; 49(11):3929-3937. PubMed ID: 35543733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of
    Ling SW; de Jong AC; Schoots IG; Nasserinejad K; Busstra MB; van der Veldt AAM; Brabander T
    Eur Urol Open Sci; 2021 Nov; 33():61-71. PubMed ID: 34632423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Histological comparison between predictive value of preoperative 3-T multiparametric MRI and
    Franklin A; Yaxley WJ; Raveenthiran S; Coughlin G; Gianduzzo T; Kua B; McEwan L; Wong D; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Samaratunga H; Brown N; Parkinson R; Roberts MJ; Yaxley JW
    BJU Int; 2021 Jan; 127(1):71-79. PubMed ID: 32524748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography for detecting lymph node metastases in primary and recurrent prostate cancer and location of recurrence after radical prostatectomy: an overview of the current literature.
    Luiting HB; van Leeuwen PJ; Busstra MB; Brabander T; van der Poel HG; Donswijk ML; Vis AN; Emmett L; Stricker PD; Roobol MJ
    BJU Int; 2020 Feb; 125(2):206-214. PubMed ID: 31680398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lymph node staging with 68Ga-PSMA PET in patients with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer suitable for radical prostatectomy managed in a prostate cancer unit.
    Maestroni UV; Campobasso D; Guarino G; Acampora A; Scarlattei M; Ziglioli F; Dinale F; Baldari G; Migliari S; Gasparro D; Ferretti S; Silini EM; Ruffini L
    Chin Clin Oncol; 2023 Jun; 12(3):22. PubMed ID: 37417288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Primary lymph-node staging with
    Corona-Montes VE; González-Cuenca E; Fernández-Noyola G; Olarte-Casas MA; Bobadilla-Salazar D; Medrano-Urtecho HM; Asimakopoulos AD
    Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 39(8):494.e1-494.e6. PubMed ID: 33223371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of
    Zhang Q; Zang S; Zhang C; Fu Y; Lv X; Zhang Q; Deng Y; Zhang C; Luo R; Zhao X; Wang W; Wang F; Guo H
    J Transl Med; 2017 Nov; 15(1):230. PubMed ID: 29115970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Head-to-head Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography and Conventional Imaging Modalities for Initial Staging of Intermediate- to High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Chow KM; So WZ; Lee HJ; Lee A; Yap DWT; Takwoingi Y; Tay KJ; Tuan J; Thang SP; Lam W; Yuen J; Lawrentschuk N; Hofman MS; Murphy DG; Chen K
    Eur Urol; 2023 Jul; 84(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 37032189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic Accuracy of
    Cantiello F; Gangemi V; Cascini GL; Calabria F; Moschini M; Ferro M; Musi G; Butticè S; Salonia A; Briganti A; Damiano R
    Urology; 2017 Aug; 106():139-145. PubMed ID: 28438628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.