These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37694033)

  • 21. A New Zinc Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement: A Boon in Dentistry.
    Kumar A; Raj A; Singh DK; Donthagani S; Kumar M; Ramesh K
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2021 Jun; 13(Suppl 1):S272-S275. PubMed ID: 34447091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength of Conventional
    Showkat I; Chaudhary S; Sinha AA; Manuja N; Telgi CR; Priya N; Kak MM
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2023 Aug; 16(Suppl 1):S72-S76. PubMed ID: 37663222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A new modification for improving shear bond strength and other mechanical properties of conventional glass-ionomer restorative materials.
    El-Negoly SA; El-Fallal AA; El-Sherbiny IM
    J Adhes Dent; 2014 Feb; 16(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 24000334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A Comparative Evaluation of Sorption, Solubility, and Compressive Strength of Three Different Glass Ionomer Cements in Artificial Saliva: An
    Bhatia HP; Singh S; Sood S; Sharma N
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2017; 10(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 28377656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparative evaluation of compressive strength and flexural strength of conventional core materials with nanohybrid composite resin core material an in vitro study.
    Jayanthi N; Vinod V
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2013 Sep; 13(3):281-9. PubMed ID: 24431748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Flexural Strength of Glass Carbomer Cement and Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement Stored in Different Storage Media over Time.
    Faridi MA; Khabeer A; Haroon S
    Med Princ Pract; 2018; 27(4):372-377. PubMed ID: 29723852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Influence of Mixing Methods on the Compressive Strength and Fluoride Release of Conventional and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements.
    Oliveira GL; Carvalho CN; Carvalho EM; Bauer J; Leal AMA
    Int J Dent; 2019; 2019():6834931. PubMed ID: 31636672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparative Evaluation of Water Sorption, Solubility, and Microhardness of Zirconia-reinforced Glass Ionomer, Resin-modified Glass Ionomer, and Type IX Glass Ionomer Restorative Materials: An
    Bethapudy DR; Bhat C; Lakade L; Chaudhary S; Kunte S; Patil S
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2022; 15(2):175-181. PubMed ID: 37457201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of CPP-ACP modified-GIC on prevention of demineralization in comparison to other fluoride-containing restorative materials.
    Sobh EG; Hamama HH; Palamara J; Mahmoud SH; Burrow MF
    Aust Dent J; 2022 Sep; 67(3):220-229. PubMed ID: 35174511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Compressive fatigue limit of four types of dental restorative materials.
    Chen S; Öhman C; Jefferies SR; Gray H; Xia W; Engqvist H
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Aug; 61():283-289. PubMed ID: 27085845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation and Comparison of Physical Properties of Cention N with Other Restorative Materials in Artificial Saliva: An
    Adsul PS; Dhawan P; Tuli A; Khanduri N; Singh A
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2022; 15(3):350-355. PubMed ID: 35991795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A novel glass ionomer cement with silver zeolite for restorative dentistry.
    Ge KX; Lung CY; Lam WY; Chu CH; Yu OY
    J Dent; 2023 Jun; 133():104524. PubMed ID: 37080532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Nanochitosan modified glass ionomer cement with enhanced mechanical properties and fluoride release.
    Senthil Kumar R; Ravikumar N; Kavitha S; Mahalaxmi S; Jayasree R; Sampath Kumar TS; Haneesh M
    Int J Biol Macromol; 2017 Nov; 104(Pt B):1860-1865. PubMed ID: 28536026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Consensus on glass-ionomer cement thresholds for restorative indications.
    de Lima Navarro MF; Pascotto RC; Borges AFS; Soares CJ; Raggio DP; Rios D; Bresciani E; Molina GF; Ngo HC; Miletić I; Frencken J; Wang L; Menezes-Silva R; Puppin-Rontani RM; de Carvalho RM; Gurgan S; Leal SC; Tüzüner T; Fagundes TC; Nicholson JW; Sidhu SK
    J Dent; 2021 Apr; 107():103609. PubMed ID: 33610589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. In vitro compressive strength and edge stability testing of directly repaired glass-ionomer cements.
    Zhang J; Braun P; Banerjee A
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Sep; 24(9):3029-3038. PubMed ID: 31845069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of discontinuous glass fibers on mechanical properties of glass ionomer cement.
    Garoushi SK; He J; Vallittu PK; Lassila LVJ
    Acta Biomater Odontol Scand; 2018; 4(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 30083578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Does Acid Challenge Affect the Properties and Bond Stability of Restorative Materials on Primary Teeth?
    Tedesco TK; Calvo AFB; Yoshioka L; Fukushima KA; Cesar PF; Raggio DP
    J Adhes Dent; 2018; 20(3):223-231. PubMed ID: 29854991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Mechanical Performance of a Novel Self-Adhesive Restorative Material.
    Lohbauer U; Belli R
    J Adhes Dent; 2020; 22(1):47-58. PubMed ID: 32030375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Long-term flexural strength of three direct aesthetic restorative materials.
    Azillah MA; Anstice HM; Pearson GJ
    J Dent; 1998 Mar; 26(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 9540316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Properties of New Glass-Ionomer Restorative Systems Marketed for Stress-Bearing Areas.
    Fuhrmann D; Murchison D; Whipple S; Vandewalle K
    Oper Dent; 2020; 45(1):104-110. PubMed ID: 31567055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.