These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3769479)

  • 1. A comparative study of transparent versus dry sterile dressings for central venous catheters.
    Gugliotti R; Richi A; Buswell I; Burkus L
    Conn Med; 1986 Sep; 50(9):615-7. PubMed ID: 3769479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Op-Site dressing study: a prospective randomized study evaluating povidone iodine ointment and extension set changes with 7-day Op-Site dressings applied to total parenteral nutrition subclavian sites.
    Powell CR; Traetow MJ; Fabri PJ; Kudsk KA; Ruberg RL
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 1985; 9(4):443-6. PubMed ID: 3928918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of central venous catheter dressings in bone marrow transplant recipients.
    Brandt B; DePalma J; Irwin M; Shogan J; Lucke JF
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 1996 Jun; 23(5):829-36. PubMed ID: 8792352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Central venous catheter-related infection in a prospective and observational study of 2,595 catheters.
    Lorente L; Henry C; Martín MM; Jiménez A; Mora ML
    Crit Care; 2005; 9(6):R631-5. PubMed ID: 16280064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cephalic vein cutdown for inserting indwelling subclavian vein catheters in gynecologic oncology patients.
    Kamat A; Kramer P; Soisson AP
    W V Med J; 2002; 98(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 11941896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The risk of central venous catheter-related sepsis in patients with surgical infections.
    van Berge Henegouwen DP; Leguit P; Boissevain AC; Hovius SE; Amer F; Brummelkamp WH; Zanen HC
    Neth J Surg; 1982 Dec; 34(5):201-5. PubMed ID: 7162678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term central venous catheters: size and location do matter.
    Onders RP; Shenk RR; Stellato TA
    Am J Surg; 2006 Mar; 191(3):396-9. PubMed ID: 16490554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Wound management, 12--Dressings for intravascular indwelling catheters: search for optimal nursing care--a never ending story?].
    Köpke S
    Pflege Z; 2003 Dec; 56(12):904-7. PubMed ID: 14710499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reduction of exit-site infections of tunnelled intravascular catheters among neutropenic patients by sustained-release chlorhexidine dressings: results from a prospective randomized controlled trial.
    Chambers ST; Sanders J; Patton WN; Ganly P; Birch M; Crump JA; Spearing RL
    J Hosp Infect; 2005 Sep; 61(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 16002181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Blood recirculation in temporary central catheters for acute hemodialysis.
    Leblanc M; Fedak S; Mokris G; Paganini EP
    Clin Nephrol; 1996 May; 45(5):315-9. PubMed ID: 8738663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dressing subclavian catheters.
    Davidson L
    Nurs Times; 1986 Feb 12-18; 82(7):40. PubMed ID: 3083404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective randomized trial comparing implantation of subcutaneous indwelling venous access devices by the cephalic vein cutdown (CVC) approach versus the percutaneous subclavian vein (PSV) approach.
    Povoski SP; Young DC
    Chir Ital; 2003; 55(1):149-50. PubMed ID: 12633056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Subcutaneous venous reservoirs: comparative study of their efficacy in patients with AIDS versus oncology and hematology patients].
    Moral A; Targarona EM; Mallolas J; Martínez J; Pros I; Valverde M; Palombo H; Trias M
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1993 Apr; 11(4):190-4. PubMed ID: 8512970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative study between two central veins for the introduction of totally implantable venous access devices in 1201 cancer patients.
    Araújo C; Silva JP; Antunes P; Fernandes JM; Dias C; Pereira H; Dias T; Fougo JL
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2008 Feb; 34(2):222-6. PubMed ID: 17566692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transparent and gauze dressings and their effect on infection rates of central venous catheters: a review of past and current literature.
    Lau CE
    J Intraven Nurs; 1996; 19(5):240-5. PubMed ID: 9060348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Randomized clinical trial of transparent polyurethane i.v. dressings.
    Popovsky MA; Ilstrup DM
    NITA; 1986; 9(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 3517708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Central venous indwelling silicone catheters].
    Osterwalder A; Bogen M; Varini M
    Helv Chir Acta; 1984 Jun; 51(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 6469674
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison and cost-effectiveness analysis of peripheral catheter dressings.
    Salles FT; Santos VL; Secoli SR; Aron S; Debbio CB; Baptista CC; Rogenski NM
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2007 Sep; 53(9):26-33. PubMed ID: 17893427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Malpositioning of Hickman catheters, left versus right sided attempts.
    Unal AE; Bayar S; Arat M; Ilhan O
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2003 Feb; 28(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 12620263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Venous access: a prospective, randomized study of the Hickman catheter.
    Wagman LD; Kirkemo A; Johnston MR
    Surgery; 1984 Mar; 95(3):303-8. PubMed ID: 6701786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.