These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37694994)

  • 1. Polygenic scores for social science: Clarification, consensus, and controversy.
    Burt CH
    Behav Brain Sci; 2023 Sep; 46():e232. PubMed ID: 37694994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Burt uses a fallacious motte-and-bailey argument to dispute the value of genetics for social science.
    Zietsch BP; Abdellaoui A; Verweij KJH
    Behav Brain Sci; 2023 Sep; 46():e231. PubMed ID: 37694992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Challenging the utility of polygenic scores for social science: Environmental confounding, downward causation, and unknown biology.
    Burt CH
    Behav Brain Sci; 2022 May; 46():e207. PubMed ID: 35551690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. All that glisters is not gold: Genetics and social science.
    Burt CH
    Behav Brain Sci; 2023 Sep; 46():e186. PubMed ID: 37694909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scientific disputes that spill over into Research Ethics: interview with Maria Cecília de Souza Minayo.
    Minayo MC
    Cien Saude Colet; 2015 Sep; 20(9):2693-6. PubMed ID: 26331502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Often wrong, sometimes useful: Including polygenic scores in social science research.
    Fletcher J
    Behav Brain Sci; 2023 Sep; 46():e213. PubMed ID: 37695002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Will social scientists' never-ending disputes over words ever end?
    Abend G
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2023 Sep; 1527(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 37522868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Social scientists would do well to steer clear of polygenic scores.
    Curtis D
    Behav Brain Sci; 2023 Sep; 46():e212. PubMed ID: 37694985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Senator Fred Harris's National Social Science Foundation proposal: Reconsidering federal science policy, natural science-social science relations, and American liberalism during the 1960s.
    Solovey M
    Isis; 2012 Mar; 103(1):54-82. PubMed ID: 22655338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consensus development in biomedicine: the liver transplant controversy.
    Markle GE; Chubin DE
    Milbank Q; 1987; 65(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 3299031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Legal aids: Science primers in the courtroom.
    Baltimore D; Tatel DS
    Nature; 2016 Apr; 532(7599):313. PubMed ID: 27127814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Genopole/IFRIS initiative].
    Med Sci (Paris); 2013 May; 29 Spec No 2():7. PubMed ID: 23759484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Polarizing crowds: Consensus and bipolarization in a persuasive arguments model.
    Barrera Lemarchand F; Semeshenko V; Navajas J; Balenzuela P
    Chaos; 2020 Jun; 30(6):063141. PubMed ID: 32611083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transgenes and transgressions: scientific dissent as heterogeneous practice.
    Delborne JA
    Soc Stud Sci; 2008 Aug; 38(4):509-41. PubMed ID: 19227618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vexed Again: Social Scientists and the Revision of the Common Rule, 2011-2018.
    Schrag ZM
    J Law Med Ethics; 2019 Jun; 47(2):254-263. PubMed ID: 31298093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biodiversity: ideas need time to mature.
    Montana J
    Nature; 2018 Sep; 561(7723):309. PubMed ID: 30232434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Coordinating dissent as an alternative to consensus classification: insights from systematics for bio-ontologies.
    Sterner B; Witteveen J; Franz N
    Hist Philos Life Sci; 2020 Feb; 42(1):8. PubMed ID: 32030540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Teaching argumentation and scientific discourse using the ribosomal peptidyl transferase reaction.
    Johnson RJ
    Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2011; 39(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 21618381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What is controversy?
    Yoder-Wise PS
    Nurs Forum; 2010; 45(2):67. PubMed ID: 20536752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The community water fluoridation 'debate': scientific consensus versus pseudoscientific confusion.
    Broadbent JM
    N Z Dent J; 2013 Sep; 109(3):86. PubMed ID: 24027970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.