These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
83. Virtual Reality in Neurosurgery: Beyond Neurosurgical Planning. Mishra R; Narayanan MDK; Umana GE; Montemurro N; Chaurasia B; Deora H Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Feb; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 35162742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
84. Video education can improve awareness of risks for patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A randomized trial. Xia T; Zhu YB; Zeng YB; Chen C; Wang SL; Zhao SB; Su XJ; Wang D; Yao J; Li ZS; Bai Y J Dig Dis; 2019 Dec; 20(12):656-662. PubMed ID: 31618520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
85. Patients' experience regarding informed consent in elective and emergency surgeries. Perić O; Mišić M; Tirić D; Penava N; Bušić D; Tomić V Med Glas (Zenica); 2018 Aug; 15(2):179-185. PubMed ID: 30047545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
86. Informed consent for elective and emergency surgery: questionnaire study. Akkad A; Jackson C; Kenyon S; Dixon-Woods M; Taub N; Habiba M BJOG; 2004 Oct; 111(10):1133-8. PubMed ID: 15383117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
87. Assessing the benefits of digital twins in neurosurgery: a systematic review. Chumnanvej S; Chumnanvej S; Tripathi S Neurosurg Rev; 2024 Jan; 47(1):52. PubMed ID: 38236336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
88. Towards a standardised informed consent procedure for live donor nephrectomy: the PRINCE (Process of Informed Consent Evaluation) project-study protocol for a nationwide prospective cohort study. Kortram K; Spoon EQ; Ismail SY; d'Ancona FC; Christiaans MH; van Heurn LW; Hofker HS; Hoksbergen AW; Homan van der Heide JJ; Idu MM; Looman CW; Nurmohamed SA; Ringers J; Toorop RJ; van de Wetering J; Ijzermans JN; Dor FJ BMJ Open; 2016 Apr; 6(4):e010594. PubMed ID: 27036141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
89. Using a multimedia presentation to improve patient understanding and satisfaction with informed consent for minimally invasive vascular procedures. Bowers N; Eisenberg E; Montbriand J; Jaskolka J; Roche-Nagle G Surgeon; 2017 Feb; 15(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 26464072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
90. Use of Surgical Risk Preoperative Assessment System (SURPAS) and Patient Satisfaction During Informed Consent for Surgery. Wiesen BM; Bronsert MR; Aasen DM; Singh AB; Lambert-Kerzner A; Henderson WG; Hammermeister KE; Meguid RA J Am Coll Surg; 2020 Jun; 230(6):1025-1033.e1. PubMed ID: 32251847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
91. Patient satisfaction with the consent discussion is not improved by showing patients their computed tomography or angiography images before they undergo vascular surgery. LeBlanc D; Power AH; DeRose G; Duncan A; Dubois L J Vasc Surg; 2018 Nov; 68(5):1517-1523.e3. PubMed ID: 29779961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
92. The Need for Improved Recruitment to Neurosurgery Training: A Systematic Review of Enrollment Strategies. Ekhator C; Rak R Cureus; 2022 Jun; 14(6):e26212. PubMed ID: 35891848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
94. Can teleconsent improve patient recall of surgical risks in knee arthroplasty? A randomised controlled trial. Turner H; Cashman J; Doran C Ir J Med Sci; 2023 Aug; 192(4):1917-1922. PubMed ID: 36104548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
95. Improving risk communication: a proof-of-concept randomised control trial assessing the impact of visual aids for neurosurgical consent. Chatzopoulou D; Jalal AHB; Stoyanov D; Marcus HJ; Pandit AS Front Surg; 2024; 11():1361040. PubMed ID: 38450052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
96. Electronic Consent at US Cancer Centers: A Survey of Practices, Challenges, and Opportunities. Chimonas S; Lipitz-Snyderman A; Gaffney K; Kuperman GJ JCO Clin Cancer Inform; 2023 Jan; 7():e2200122. PubMed ID: 36595735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
97. Enhancing neurosurgical navigation operation flow management through personal digital assistant technology: a prospective cohort study. Quan Y; Zhang M; Ji H; Cheng R Front Public Health; 2024; 12():1408378. PubMed ID: 38883191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
98. Barriers to Obtaining Informed Consent on Shortterm Surgical Missions. Čebron U; Honeyman C; Berhane M; Patel V; Martin D; McGurk M Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2020 May; 8(5):e2823. PubMed ID: 33133898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
99. Use of E-Consent in Healthcare Settings: A Scoping Review. Obaidi H; Elkhyatt Y; Alzubaidi M; Househ M Stud Health Technol Inform; 2024 Aug; 316():1064-1068. PubMed ID: 39176973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
100. A cost-consequence analysis of eLearning videos designed to supplement the consent process in lower limb arthroplasty. Brock J; Sale A; Jayaraju U; Chandetreya A; Lee P Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2023 Mar; 105(3):278-282. PubMed ID: 36260293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]