These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37696746)

  • 21. Comparison of the dimensional and morphological accuracy of three-dimensional digital dental casts digitized using different methods.
    Ye J; Wang S; Wang Z; Liu Y; Sun Y; Ye H; Zhou Y
    Odontology; 2023 Jan; 111(1):165-171. PubMed ID: 36068382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Accuracy of complete-arch intraoral scans based on confocal microscopy versus optical triangulation: A comparative in vitro study.
    Waldecker M; Rues S; Rammelsberg P; Bömicke W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Sep; 126(3):414-420. PubMed ID: 32950254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of Virtual Intersection and Occlusal Contacts between Intraoral and Laboratory Scans: An In-Vivo Study.
    Beck F; Lettner S; Zupancic Cepic L; Schedle A
    J Clin Med; 2023 Jan; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 36769645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of splinting scan bodies on the trueness of complete arch digital implant scans with 5 different intraoral scanners.
    Azevedo L; Marques T; Karasan D; Fehmer V; Sailer I; Correia A; Gómez-Polo M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):204-210. PubMed ID: 37537105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical evaluation of the precision of interocclusal registration by using digital and conventional techniques.
    Iwauchi Y; Tanaka S; Kamimura-Sugimura E; Baba K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):611-617. PubMed ID: 33775391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners for scanning edentulous and dentate complete-arch mandibular casts: A comparative in vitro study.
    Braian M; Wennerberg A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Aug; 122(2):129-136.e2. PubMed ID: 30885584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accuracy of six intraoral scanners for scanning complete-arch and 4-unit fixed partial dentures: An in vitro study.
    Diker B; Tak Ö
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 33558056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Trueness evaluation of digital impression: The impact of the selection of reference and test object.
    Yatmaz BB; Raith S; Reich S
    J Dent; 2021 Aug; 111():103706. PubMed ID: 34077800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine.
    Revilla-León M; Att W; Özcan M; Rubenstein J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):470-478. PubMed ID: 32386912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Scan time and accuracy of full-arch scans with intraoral scanners: a comparative study on conditions of the intraoral head-simulator and the hand-held model].
    Wu MT; Tang SX; Peng LY; Han YT; Su YC; Wang X
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Jun; 56(6):570-575. PubMed ID: 34098673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Does the available interocclusal space influence the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship captured with an intraoral scanner?
    Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M; Zeitler JM; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Pérez-Barquero JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Aug; 132(2):435-440. PubMed ID: 36349566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro.
    Ender A; Zimmermann M; Mehl A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 30848250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Conventional and digital complete arch implant impression techniques: An in vitro study comparing accuracy.
    Gómez-Polo M; Sallorenzo A; Cascos R; Ballesteros J; Barmak AB; Revilla-León M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Oct; 132(4):809-818. PubMed ID: 36539313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of printing layer thickness on the trueness and fit of additively manufactured removable dies.
    Yilmaz B; Donmez MB; Kahveci Ç; Cuellar AR; de Paula MS; Schimmel M; Abou-Ayash S; Çakmak G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Dec; 128(6):1318.e1-1318.e9. PubMed ID: 36435670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Conventional open-tray impression versus intraoral digital scan for implant-level complete-arch impression.
    Kim KR; Seo KY; Kim S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Dec; 122(6):543-549. PubMed ID: 30955939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of ambient temperature changes on intraoral scanning accuracy.
    Revilla-León M; Gohil A; Barmak AB; Gómez-Polo M; Pérez-Barquero JA; Att W; Kois JC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Nov; 130(5):755-760. PubMed ID: 35210107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of ambient light conditions on the accuracy and scanning time of seven intraoral scanners in complete-arch implant scans.
    Ochoa-López G; Cascos R; Antonaya-Martín JL; Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M
    J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104138. PubMed ID: 35461973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Impact of internal design on the accuracy of 3-dimensionally printed casts fabricated by stereolithography and digital light processing technology.
    Chen Y; Li H; Zhai Z; Nakano T; Ishigaki S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Sep; 130(3):381.e1-381.e7. PubMed ID: 37482533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical Study of the Influence of Ambient Light Scanning Conditions on the Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of an Intraoral Scanner.
    Revilla-León M; Subramanian SG; Özcan M; Krishnamurthy VR
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):107-113. PubMed ID: 31860144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Trueness and surface characteristics of 3-dimensional printed casts made with different technologies.
    Young Kim RJ; Cho SM; Jung WS; Park JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 36635136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.