These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37696993)

  • 1. A new static visual field test algorithm: the Ambient Interactive ZEST (AIZE).
    Nomoto H; Matsumoto C; Okuyama S; Kimura S; Inoue S; Yamanaka K; Kusaka S
    Sci Rep; 2023 Sep; 13(1):14945. PubMed ID: 37696993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial Entropy Pursuit for Fast and Accurate Perimetry Testing.
    Wild D; Kucur SS; Sznitman R
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2017 Jul; 58(9):3414-3424. PubMed ID: 28692736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incorporating Spatial Models in Visual Field Test Procedures.
    Rubinstein NJ; McKendrick AM; Turpin A
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2016 Mar; 5(2):7. PubMed ID: 26981329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from full threshold, ZEST, and SITA-like strategies, as determined by computer simulation.
    Turpin A; McKendrick AM; Johnson CA; Vingrys AJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Nov; 44(11):4787-95. PubMed ID: 14578400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Advantages of terminating Zippy Estimation by Sequential Testing (ZEST) with dynamic criteria for white-on-white perimetry.
    McKendrick AM; Turpin A
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Nov; 82(11):981-7. PubMed ID: 16317375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retesting visual fields: utilizing prior information to decrease test-retest variability in glaucoma.
    Turpin A; Jankovic D; McKendrick AM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Apr; 48(4):1627-34. PubMed ID: 17389493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Role of visual field reliability indices in ruling out glaucoma.
    Rao HL; Yadav RK; Begum VU; Addepalli UK; Choudhari NS; Senthil S; Garudadri CS
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 133(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 25256758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence-based Criteria for Assessment of Visual Field Reliability.
    Yohannan J; Wang J; Brown J; Chauhan BC; Boland MV; Friedman DS; Ramulu PY
    Ophthalmology; 2017 Nov; 124(11):1612-1620. PubMed ID: 28676280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Course of Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss Across the Entire Perimetric Range.
    Otarola F; Chen A; Morales E; Yu F; Afifi A; Caprioli J
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2016 May; 134(5):496-502. PubMed ID: 26967170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of a variability-adjusted algorithm on the efficiency of perimetric testing.
    Gardiner SK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 May; 55(5):2983-92. PubMed ID: 24713484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictors of Long-Term Visual Field Fluctuation in Glaucoma Patients.
    Rabiolo A; Morales E; Kim JH; Afifi AA; Yu F; Nouri-Mahdavi K; Caprioli J
    Ophthalmology; 2020 Jun; 127(6):739-747. PubMed ID: 31952885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. TORONTO: A trial-oriented multidimensional psychometric testing algorithm.
    Shi RB; Eizenman M; Li-Han LY; Wong W
    J Vis; 2024 Jul; 24(7):2. PubMed ID: 38953860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Towards Patient-Tailored Perimetry: Automated Perimetry Can Be Improved by Seeding Procedures With Patient-Specific Structural Information.
    Denniss J; McKendrick AM; Turpin A
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2013 May; 2(4):3. PubMed ID: 24049720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of the reliability of standard automated perimetry in regions of glaucomatous damage.
    Gardiner SK; Swanson WH; Goren D; Mansberger SL; Demirel S
    Ophthalmology; 2014 Jul; 121(7):1359-69. PubMed ID: 24629617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Targeted spatial sampling using GOANNA improves detection of visual field progression.
    Chong LX; Turpin A; McKendrick AM
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Mar; 35(2):155-69. PubMed ID: 25683867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of efficient test procedures for frequency-doubling technology perimetry in normal and glaucomatous eyes.
    Turpin A; McKendrick AM; Johnson CA; Vingrys AJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Mar; 43(3):709-15. PubMed ID: 11867588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Quality and Output of Different Optimal Perimetric Testing Approaches in Children With Glaucoma.
    Patel DE; Cumberland PM; Walters BC; Russell-Eggitt I; Brookes J; Papadopoulos M; Khaw PT; Viswanathan AC; Garway-Heath D; Cortina-Borja M; Rahi JS;
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2018 Feb; 136(2):155-161. PubMed ID: 29285534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Data Preprocessing and Augmentation Improved Visual Field Prediction of Recurrent Neural Network with Multi-Central Datasets.
    Park JR; Kim S; Kim T; Jin SW; Kim JL; Shin J; Lee SU; Jang G; Hu Y; Lee JW
    Ophthalmic Res; 2023; 66(1):978-991. PubMed ID: 37231880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving Spatial Resolution and Test Times of Visual Field Testing Using ARREST.
    Turpin A; Morgan WH; McKendrick AM
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2018 Sep; 7(5):35. PubMed ID: 30402342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors Predicting a Greater Likelihood of Poor Visual Field Reliability in Glaucoma Patients and Suspects.
    Aboobakar IF; Wang J; Chauhan BC; Boland MV; Friedman DS; Ramulu PY; Yohannan J
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2020 Jan; 9(1):4. PubMed ID: 32509439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.