These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37697013)

  • 1. Nonlinear analysis of reinforced concrete buildings with different heights and floor systems.
    Abd-Elhamed A; Mahmoud S; Alotaibi KS
    Sci Rep; 2023 Sep; 13(1):14949. PubMed ID: 37697013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Specific seismic retrofitting of a compact reinforced concrete building with X-bracings and steel jackets. Application to a primary school in Huelva.
    Romero-Sánchez E; Morales-Esteban A; Requena-García-Cruz MV; Zapico-Blanco B; de-Miguel-Rodríguez J
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0238505. PubMed ID: 32915839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Earthquake Shaking and Damage to Buildings: Recent evidence for severe ground shaking raises questions about the earthquake resistance of structures.
    Page RA; Joyner WB; Blume JA
    Science; 1975 Aug; 189(4203):601-8. PubMed ID: 17838741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of seismic vulnerability index methodology for reinforced concrete buildings based on nonlinear parametric analyses.
    Kassem MM; Mohamed Nazri F; Noroozinejad Farsangi E
    MethodsX; 2019; 6():199-211. PubMed ID: 30766800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development and present status of seismic evaluation and seismic retrofit of existing reinforced concrete buildings in Japan.
    Okada T
    Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci; 2021; 97(7):402-422. PubMed ID: 34380916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Effect of Soil-Structure Interaction on the Seismic Response of Structures Using Machine Learning, Finite Element Modeling and ASCE 7-16 Methods.
    Ali T; Eldin MN; Haider W
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Feb; 23(4):. PubMed ID: 36850644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Progressive collapse potential of different types of irregular buildings located in diverse seismic sites.
    Yavari H; Ghobadi MS; Yakhchalian M
    Heliyon; 2019 Jan; 5(1):e01137. PubMed ID: 30705987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Seismic vulnerability assessment to earthquake at urban scale: A case of Mostaganem city in Algeria.
    Chaibedra B; Benanane A; Boutaraa Z
    Jamba; 2018; 10(1):473. PubMed ID: 29955262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Seismic performance and cost comparison of RC moment resisting and dual frames using UBC 97 and IBC 2021.
    Shakeel S; Khan SH; Saqib SA; Khan MA; Moiz MA
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jul; 14(1):16349. PubMed ID: 39014097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of seismic performance and effectiveness of multiple slim-type damper system for seismic response control of building structures.
    Kim D; Sung EH; Park KS; Park J
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():189106. PubMed ID: 25301387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of Pilotis Structures Supported by Drift-Hardening Concrete Columns.
    Yuan S; Takeuchi T; Sun Y
    Materials (Basel); 2023 Sep; 16(19):. PubMed ID: 37834482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of seismic resilience index methodology for RC structures via functionality curve.
    Chee Yin H; Kassem MM; Mohamed Nazri F; El Maissi AM
    MethodsX; 2022; 9():101865. PubMed ID: 36193117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A semi-active H∞ control strategy with application to the vibration suppression of nonlinear high-rise building under earthquake excitations.
    Yan G; Chen F; Wu Y
    Springerplus; 2016; 5(1):1053. PubMed ID: 27462501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of Structural Robustness against Column Loss: Methodology and Application to RC Frame Buildings.
    Bao Y; Main JA; Noh SY
    J Struct Eng (N Y N Y); 2017 Aug; 143(8):. PubMed ID: 28890599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Seismic Performance Evaluation According to HSS and CFST Columns of 3D Frame Buildings with Rubber Friction Bearing (RFB).
    Kim YC; Shahriyer H; Hu JW
    Materials (Basel); 2022 Feb; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 35207824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of the seismic performance of isolated buildings according to life-cycle cost.
    Dang Y; Han JP; Li YT
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2015; 2015():495042. PubMed ID: 25653677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Seismic response analysis of super-high-rise building structures with three-layer isolation systems.
    Zhang Y; Guo Z; Liu D; Sun W
    Sci Rep; 2023 Nov; 13(1):19165. PubMed ID: 37932380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of Seismic Response Evaluation of Two-Dimensional Analysis Model with Rigid Joints for RC Frame Buildings.
    Kang JD; Nagae T; Jeong SH; Kajiwara K
    Materials (Basel); 2022 Nov; 15(22):. PubMed ID: 36431513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance of structures in İzmir after the Samos island earthquake.
    Yakut A; Sucuoğlu H; Binici B; Canbay E; Donmez C; İlki A; Caner A; Celik OC; Ay BÖ
    Bull Earthq Eng; 2022; 20(14):7793-7818. PubMed ID: 35210980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Seismic collapse assessment of bridge piers constructed with steel fibers reinforced concrete.
    Pang Y; Li L
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200072. PubMed ID: 29990364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.