These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37699176)

  • 1. Trueness Evaluation of Latest Generation of Intraoral Scanners on Complete-Arch Implant Impressions.
    İşsever DŞA; Değer Sİ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2023 Sep; 36(4):1-12. PubMed ID: 37699176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of additional reference objects on accuracy of five intraoral scanners in partially and completely edentulous jaws: An in vitro study.
    Rutkūnas V; Gedrimienė A; Al-Haj Husain N; Pletkus J; Barauskis D; Jegelevičius D; Özcan M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jul; 130(1):111-118. PubMed ID: 34799084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of scanbody design and intraoral scanner on the trueness of complete arch implant digital impressions: An in vitro study.
    Meneghetti PC; Li J; Borella PS; Mendonça G; Burnett LH
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(12):e0295790. PubMed ID: 38113200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Understanding the effect of scan spans on the accuracy of intraoral and desktop scanners.
    Chen Y; Zhai Z; Watanabe S; Nakano T; Ishigaki S
    J Dent; 2022 Sep; 124():104220. PubMed ID: 35817227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of complete-arch implant scanning with 5 different intraoral scanners in terms of trueness and operator experience.
    Revell G; Simon B; Mennito A; Evans ZP; Renne W; Ludlow M; Vág J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):632-638. PubMed ID: 33832761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trueness of 12 intraoral scanners in the full-arch implant impression: a comparative in vitro study.
    Mangano FG; Admakin O; Bonacina M; Lerner H; Rutkunas V; Mangano C
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Sep; 20(1):263. PubMed ID: 32962680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of six intraoral scanners for scanning complete-arch and 4-unit fixed partial dentures: An in vitro study.
    Diker B; Tak Ö
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 33558056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Accuracy analysis of full-arch implant digital impressions when using a geometric feature].
    Ke YF; Zhang YP; Chen JK; Chen H; Wang Y; Sun YC
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Feb; 57(2):162-167. PubMed ID: 35152652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do digital impressions have a greater accuracy for full-arch implant-supported reconstructions compared to conventional impressions? An
    Shaikh M; Lakha T; Kheur S; Qamri B; Kheur M
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2022; 22(4):398-404. PubMed ID: 36511075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trueness and Precision of Four Intraoral Scanners in Oral Implantology: A Comparative in Vitro Study.
    Mangano FG; Veronesi G; Hauschild U; Mijiritsky E; Mangano C
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0163107. PubMed ID: 27684723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro evaluation of the impact of intraoral scanner, scanning aids, and the scanned arch on the scan accuracy of edentulous arches.
    Jamjoom FZ; Aldghim A; Aldibasi O; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 38953541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exploring the impact of the extent of the partially edentulous area on the accuracy of two intraoral scanners.
    Alfaraj A; Khanlar LN; Lin WS; Zandinejad A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; 131(1):163.e1-163.e8. PubMed ID: 37891042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners: A single-blinded in vitro study.
    Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Tsagarakis A; Kourakis G; Pavlakis E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Nov; 124(5):581-588. PubMed ID: 31870614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of scan powder and scanning technology on measured deviations of complete-arch implant supported frameworks digitized with industrial and intraoral scanners.
    Donmez MB; Çakmak G; Dede DÖ; Küçükekenci AS; Lu WE; Schumacher FL; Revilla-León M; Yilmaz B
    J Dent; 2023 Nov; 138():104736. PubMed ID: 37802291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of the dental arch and number of cutting-off and rescanning mesh holes on the accuracy of implant scans in partially edentulous situations.
    Gómez-Polo M; Immorlano MG; Cascos-Sánchez R; Ortega R; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Revilla-León M
    J Dent; 2023 Oct; 137():104667. PubMed ID: 37595865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Conventional Versus Digital Complete Arch Implant Impressions.
    Albayrak B; Sukotjo C; Wee AG; Korkmaz İH; Bayındır F
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Feb; 30(2):163-170. PubMed ID: 32935894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of 14 intraoral scanners for the All-on-4 treatment concept: a comparative
    Kaya G; Bilmenoglu C
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2022 Dec; 14(6):388-398. PubMed ID: 36685788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of ambient light conditions on the accuracy and scanning time of seven intraoral scanners in complete-arch implant scans.
    Ochoa-López G; Cascos R; Antonaya-Martín JL; Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M
    J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104138. PubMed ID: 35461973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In Vitro Trueness and Precision of Intraoral Scanners in a Four-Implant Complete-Arch Model.
    Spagopoulos D; Kaisarlis G; Spagopoulou F; Halazonetis DJ; Güth JF; Papazoglou E
    Dent J (Basel); 2023 Jan; 11(1):. PubMed ID: 36661564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of a chairside reverse scanbody workflow for a complete arch implant-supported prosthesis using four intraoral scanners versus a desktop scanner.
    Nuytens P; Vandeweghe S; D'haese R
    J Dent; 2023 Nov; 138():104717. PubMed ID: 37739058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.