These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37699176)

  • 21. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro.
    Ender A; Zimmermann M; Mehl A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 30848250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. In Vitro Comparison of the Accuracy of Conventional Impression and Four Intraoral Scanners in Four Different Implant Impression Scenarios.
    Alpkılıç DŞ; Değer Sİ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 35235619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of substrate adjacent to the scan region on the trueness of four intraoral scanners: An in vitro study.
    Elter B; Tak Ö
    J Dent; 2023 Nov; 138():104729. PubMed ID: 37778497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracy of impression-making methods in edentulous arches: An in vitro study encompassing conventional and digital methods.
    Li J; Moon HS; Kim JH; Yoon HI; Oh KC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):479-486. PubMed ID: 33583617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of posterior span length on the trueness and precision of 3 intraoral digital scanners: A comparative 3-dimensional
    Fattouh M; Kenawi LMM; Fattouh H
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2021 Dec; 51(4):399-406. PubMed ID: 34988000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners in the impressions of single and multiple implants: a comparative in vitro study.
    Mangano FG; Hauschild U; Veronesi G; Imburgia M; Mangano C; Admakin O
    BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun; 19(1):101. PubMed ID: 31170969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Trueness and precision of mandibular complete-arch implant scans when different data acquisition methods are used.
    Demirel M; Donmez MB; Şahmalı SM
    J Dent; 2023 Nov; 138():104700. PubMed ID: 37714451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Complete-arch accuracy of intraoral scanners.
    Treesh JC; Liacouras PC; Taft RM; Brooks DI; Raiciulescu S; Ellert DO; Grant GT; Ye L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):382-388. PubMed ID: 29724554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The impact of mandibular partial edentulous distal extension on virtual occlusal record accuracy when using two different intraoral scanners: An in vitro analysis.
    Tian J; Jung RE; Han Y; Mei Y; Di P
    J Dent; 2024 Nov; 150():105303. PubMed ID: 39134116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. In Vitro Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Impressions for Full-Arch Implant-Supported Prostheses.
    D'haese R; Vrombaut T; Roeykens H; Vandeweghe S
    J Clin Med; 2022 Jan; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 35160045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of Intraoral Scanning Modes in Three Distinct Full- Arch Digital Implant Impression Scenarios: An In Vitro Study.
    Sezer T; Yılmaz E; Esim E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2024 May; 0(0):1-15. PubMed ID: 38758382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accuracy of Complete-Arch Implant Digital Scans: Effect of Scanning Protocol, Number of Implants, and Scan Body Splinting.
    Denneulin T; Rignon-Bret C; Ravalec G; Tapie L; Bouter D; Wulfman C
    Int J Prosthodont; 2023 May; 36(2):219-227. PubMed ID: 36288490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners for scanning edentulous and dentate complete-arch mandibular casts: A comparative in vitro study.
    Braian M; Wennerberg A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Aug; 122(2):129-136.e2. PubMed ID: 30885584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Solid index versus intraoral scanners in the full-arch implant impression: in vitro trueness evaluation.
    Mangano FG; Bonacina M; Mandelli F; Marchiori F
    BMC Res Notes; 2020 Nov; 13(1):504. PubMed ID: 33143732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influence of operator experience, scanner type, and scan size on 3D scans.
    Resende CCD; Barbosa TAQ; Moura GF; Tavares LDN; Rizzante FAP; George FM; Neves FDD; Mendonça G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):294-299. PubMed ID: 32115221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accuracy of impressions for multiple implants: A comparative study of digital and conventional techniques.
    Lyu M; Di P; Lin Y; Jiang X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1017-1023. PubMed ID: 33640093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. In vivo trueness and precision of full-arch implant scans using intraoral scanners with three different acquisition protocols.
    Nedelcu R; Olsson P; Thulin M; Nyström I; Thor A
    J Dent; 2023 Jan; 128():104308. PubMed ID: 36481688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of the accuracy of full-arch impressions between three different intraoral scanners and conventional impressions: A prospective in vivo study.
    Bhatia N; Muthuswamy Pandian S
    J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2024; 18(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 38881640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Trueness and Precision of Three-Dimensional Digitizing Intraoral Devices.
    Mutwalli H; Braian M; Mahmood D; Larsson C
    Int J Dent; 2018; 2018():5189761. PubMed ID: 30598665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accuracy of digital complete-arch, multi-implant scans made in the edentulous jaw with gingival movement simulation: An in vitro study.
    Knechtle N; Wiedemeier D; Mehl A; Ender A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):468-478. PubMed ID: 33612335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.