122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37699182)
1. Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Bone Levels, ISQ Trends, and Implant Survival Rates Between Conventional Drilling and Osteotome Technique Using Implants of Varied Lengths: A Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
Lakha T; Kheur M; Hämmerle C; Kheur S; Qamri B
Int J Prosthodont; 2023 Sep; 36(4):416-425. PubMed ID: 37699182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The developing patterns of calibrated implant stability quotients of posterior implants.
Mei CC; Lin YT; Chang CC; Hong A; Hong HH
J Dent Sci; 2022 Jan; 17(1):241-248. PubMed ID: 35028044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implant Stability Quotients of Osteotome Bone Expansion and Conventional Drilling Technique for 4.1 mm Diameter Implant at Posterior Mandible.
Hong HH; Hong A; Yang LY; Chang WY; Huang YF; Lin YT
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Apr; 19(2):253-260. PubMed ID: 27665748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Implant Stability Using Resonance Frequency Analysis: Osteotome Versus Conventional Drilling.
Sadeghi R; Rokn AR; Miremadi A
J Dent (Tehran); 2015 Sep; 12(9):647-54. PubMed ID: 27148375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative study of crestal bone loss and implant stability between osteotome and conventional implant insertion techniques: a randomized controlled clinical trial study.
Shayesteh YS; Khojasteh A; Siadat H; Monzavi A; Bassir SH; Hossaini M; Alikhasi M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Jun; 15(3):350-7. PubMed ID: 21815994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Osteotome and Conventional Drilling Techniques for Primary Implant Stability: An In Vitro Study.
Tsolaki IN; Tonsekar PP; Najafi B; Drew HJ; Sullivan AJ; Petrov SD
J Oral Implantol; 2016 Aug; 42(4):321-5. PubMed ID: 26938712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Implant stability and bone density: assessment of correlation in fresh cadavers using conventional and osteotome implant sockets.
Cehreli MC; Kökat AM; Comert A; Akkocaoğlu M; Tekdemir I; Akça K
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1163-9. PubMed ID: 19681964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of different surgical procedures on the stability of dental implants in posterior maxilla: A randomized clinical study.
Planinić D; Dubravica I; Šarac Z; Poljak-Guberina R; Celebic A; Bago I; Cabov T; Peric B
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Nov; 122(5):487-493. PubMed ID: 32828993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical outcomes of an osteotome technique and simultaneous placement of Neoss implants in the posterior maxilla.
Volpe S; Lanza M; Verrocchi D; Sennerby L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Feb; 15(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 21815996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Developing Stability of Posterior Mandibular Implants Placed With Osteotome Expansion Technique Compared With Conventional Drilling Techniques.
Lin YT; Hong A; Peng YC; Hong HH
J Oral Implantol; 2017 Apr; 43(2):131-138. PubMed ID: 28048965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stability evaluation of implants placed in the atrophic maxilla using osteotome sinus floor elevation with and without bone grafting: A 5-year prospective study.
Merheb J; Nurdin N; Bischof M; Gimeno-Rico M; Quirynen M; Nedir R
Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2019; 12(3):337-346. PubMed ID: 31535102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and insertional torque (IT) stability comparisons of implants placed using osteotomes versus drilling techniques: A preliminary case study.
Xing Y; Khandelwal N; Petrov S; Drew HJ; Mupparapu M
Quintessence Int; 2015 Oct; 46(9):789-98. PubMed ID: 26159207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Maxillary sinus floor elevation using the (transalveolar) osteotome technique with or without grafting material. Part I: Implant survival and patients' perception.
Pjetursson BE; Rast C; Brägger U; Schmidlin K; Zwahlen M; Lang NP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):667-76. PubMed ID: 19486079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical evaluation of short 6-mm implants alone, short 8-mm implants combined with osteotome sinus floor elevation and standard 10-mm implants combined with osteotome sinus floor elevation in posterior maxillae: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Shi JY; Gu YX; Qiao SC; Zhuang LF; Zhang XM; Lai HC
Trials; 2015 Jul; 16():324. PubMed ID: 26223254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing the effect of preparation of the implant sites with piezosurgery and conventional drilling on the stability of implants at 5-months follow-up.
Soheilifar S; Bidgoli M; Houshyar E; Farhadian M; Ghamari A
J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2018; 28(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 29772986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of crestal bone loss and implant stability among the implants placed with conventional procedure and using osteotome technique: a clinical study.
Padmanabhan TV; Gupta RK
J Oral Implantol; 2010; 36(6):475-83. PubMed ID: 21142790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dynamics of implant site preparation affecting the quality of osseointegrated implants in the maxillary aesthetic zone.
Sallam HM; Khalifa GA; Khalifa FA
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2020 Jul; 48(7):645-652. PubMed ID: 32505529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Osteotome versus conventional drilling technique for implant site preparation: a comparative study in the rabbit.
Nóbrega AR; Norton A; Silva JA; Silva JP; Branco FM; Anitua E
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2012 Jun; 32(3):e109-15. PubMed ID: 22408780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical Investigation and Patient Satisfaction of Short Implants Versus Longer Implants with Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation in Atrophic Posterior Maxillae: A Pilot Randomized Trial.
Zhang XM; Shi JY; Gu YX; Qiao SC; Mo JJ; Lai HC
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 19(1):161-166. PubMed ID: 27389435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Resonance frequency analysis of implants placed with osteotome sinus floor elevation in posterior maxillae.
Qian SJ; Gu YX; Mo JJ; Qiao SC; Zhuang LF; Lai HC
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Jan; 27(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 25521163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
