These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37699194)
1. The Influence of Hearing Loss on the Pupil Response to Degraded Speech. Zekveld AA; Pielage H; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Oct; 66(10):4083-4099. PubMed ID: 37699194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response. Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hearing Impairment: Reduced Pupil Dilation Response and Frontal Activation During Degraded Speech Perception. Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Heslenfeld DJ; Versfeld NJ; Vriend C J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2024 Nov; 67(11):4549-4566. PubMed ID: 39392910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility. Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Copresence Was Found to Be Related to Some Pupil Measures in Persons With Hearing Loss While They Performed a Speech-in-Noise Task. Pielage H; Plain BJ; Saunders GH; Versfeld NJ; Lunner T; Kramer SE; Zekveld AA Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1190-1201. PubMed ID: 37012623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The eye as a window to the listening brain: neural correlates of pupil size as a measure of cognitive listening load. Zekveld AA; Heslenfeld DJ; Johnsrude IS; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 101():76-86. PubMed ID: 24999040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of stimulus-related factors and hearing impairment on listening effort as indicated by pupil dilation. Ohlenforst B; Zekveld AA; Lunner T; Wendt D; Naylor G; Wang Y; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():68-79. PubMed ID: 28622894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cortisol, Chromogranin A, and Pupillary Responses Evoked by Speech Recognition Tasks in Normally Hearing and Hard-of-Hearing Listeners: A Pilot Study. Kramer SE; Teunissen CE; Zekveld AA Ear Hear; 2016; 37 Suppl 1():126S-35S. PubMed ID: 27355762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pupil Responses of Adults With Traumatic Brain Injury During Processing of Speech in Noise. Koelewijn T; van Haastrecht JAP; Kramer SE Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518811444. PubMed ID: 30482105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of attention on the speech reception threshold and pupil response of people with impaired and normal hearing. Koelewijn T; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():56-63. PubMed ID: 28869841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Please try harder! The influence of hearing status and evaluative feedback during listening on the pupil dilation response, saliva-cortisol and saliva alpha-amylase levels. Zekveld AA; van Scheepen JAM; Versfeld NJ; Veerman ECI; Kramer SE Hear Res; 2019 Sep; 381():107768. PubMed ID: 31387070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of reward on listening effort as reflected by the pupil dilation response. Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Lunner T; Kramer SE Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():106-112. PubMed ID: 30096490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Benefit of Higher Maximum Force Output on Listening Effort in Bone-Anchored Hearing System Users: A Pupillometry Study. Bianchi F; Wendt D; Wassard C; Maas P; Lunner T; Rosenbom T; Holmberg M Ear Hear; 2019; 40(5):1220-1232. PubMed ID: 30807542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Systematic Comparison of Trial Exclusion Criteria for Pupillometry Data Analysis in Individuals With Single-Sided Deafness and Normal Hearing. Burg EA; Thakkar T; Fields T; Misurelli SM; Kuchinsky SE; Roche J; Lee DJ; Litovsky RY Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211013256. PubMed ID: 34024219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pupil size varies with word listening and response selection difficulty in older adults with hearing loss. Kuchinsky SE; Ahlstrom JB; Vaden KI; Cute SL; Humes LE; Dubno JR; Eckert MA Psychophysiology; 2013 Jan; 50(1):23-34. PubMed ID: 23157603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker. Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response. Ohlenforst B; Wendt D; Kramer SE; Naylor G; Zekveld AA; Lunner T Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():90-99. PubMed ID: 29779607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Input-related demands: vocoded sentences evoke different pupillometrics and subjective listening effort than sentences in speech-shaped noise. Giuliani NP; Venkitakrishnan S; Wu YH Int J Audiol; 2024 Mar; 63(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 36519812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictive Sentence Context Reduces Listening Effort in Older Adults With and Without Hearing Loss and With High and Low Working Memory Capacity. Hunter CR; Humes LE Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1164-1177. PubMed ID: 34983897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relations Between Self-Reported Daily-Life Fatigue, Hearing Status, and Pupil Dilation During a Speech Perception in Noise Task. Wang Y; Naylor G; Kramer SE; Zekveld AA; Wendt D; Ohlenforst B; Lunner T Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):573-582. PubMed ID: 29117062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]