112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37700446)
1. Occupational Lead Exposure Ototoxicity Evaluated With Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emissions.
Solis-Angeles S; Del Razo LM; Aguilar-Madrid G; Jiménez-Ramírez C; Coco L; Cabello-López A; Juárez-Pérez CA
Ear Hear; 2024 Mar-Apr 01; 45(2):329-336. PubMed ID: 37700446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.
Reavis KM; Phillips DS; Fausti SA; Gordon JS; Helt WJ; Wilmington D; Bratt GW; Konrad-Martin D
Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):875-93. PubMed ID: 18753950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and pure tone audiometry in occupational screening for auditory deficit due to noise exposure.
Wooles N; Mulheran M; Bray P; Brewster M; Banerjee AR
J Laryngol Otol; 2015 Dec; 129(12):1174-81. PubMed ID: 26549131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evoked otoacoustic emissions--an approach for monitoring cisplatin induced ototoxicity in children.
Stavroulaki P; Apostolopoulos N; Segas J; Tsakanikos M; Adamopoulos G
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2001 May; 59(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 11376818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of aging on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in adults with normal hearing.
Uchida Y; Ando F; Shimokata H; Sugiura S; Ueda H; Nakashima T
Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):176-84. PubMed ID: 18595184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Test-retest reliability of distortion-product thresholds compared to behavioral auditory thresholds.
Bader K; Dierkes L; Braun LH; Gummer AW; Dalhoff E; Zelle D
Hear Res; 2021 Jul; 406():108232. PubMed ID: 33984603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
Hoth S
Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Otoacoustic emissions measurements in children during the chemotherapy because of the acute lymphoblastic leukemia].
Lisowska G; Namysłowski G; Hajduk A; Polok A; Tomaszewska R; Misiołek M
Otolaryngol Pol; 2006; 60(3):415-20. PubMed ID: 16989457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Further efforts to predict pure-tone thresholds from distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions.
Gorga MP; Neely ST; Dorn PA; Hoover BM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jun; 113(6):3275-84. PubMed ID: 12822800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance for a priori criteria and for multifrequency audiometric standards.
Gorga MP; Neely ST; Dorn PA
Ear Hear; 1999 Aug; 20(4):345-62. PubMed ID: 10466570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictors of hearing threshold levels and distortion product otoacoustic emissions among noise exposed young adults.
Seixas NS; Kujawa SG; Norton S; Sheppard L; Neitzel R; Slee A
Occup Environ Med; 2004 Nov; 61(11):899-907. PubMed ID: 15477283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlation between DPOAE I/O functions and pure-tone thresholds.
Campos Ude P; Carvallo RM
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2011; 77(6):754-60. PubMed ID: 22183282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automated pure-tone threshold estimations from extrapolated distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) input/output functions.
Schmuziger N; Patscheke J; Probst R
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):1937-9. PubMed ID: 16642804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of cumulative noise exposure on distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
Lin IF; Tsai PJ; Wu JL; Chin WS; Lin CY; Guo YL
Int J Audiol; 2023 Sep; 62(9):886-892. PubMed ID: 35968641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Distortion-product otoacoustic emission test performance for ototoxicity monitoring.
Reavis KM; McMillan G; Austin D; Gallun F; Fausti SA; Gordon JS; Helt WJ; Konrad-Martin D
Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):61-74. PubMed ID: 20625302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Correlational Analysis between Audiometric Pure-tone Averages and Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions.
Wu H; Cai J; Zhang H; Chen F
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2022 Jul; 2022():812-815. PubMed ID: 36086550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Study on distortion product otoacoustic emissions and expanded high frequency audiometry in noise exposure workers].
Han J; Li F; Zhao C; Zhang Z; Ni D
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Jan; 17(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 12725180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interpreting auditory brainstem evoked responses and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in diabetic patients with normal hearing.
Cho WK; Kang WS; Lee JB; Park HJ; Chung JW; Ahn JH
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2021 Apr; 48(2):227-234. PubMed ID: 32921527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Subclinical Auditory Dysfunction: Relationship Between Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions and the Audiogram.
Bramhall NF; McMillan GP; Mashburn AN
Am J Audiol; 2021 Oct; 30(3S):854-869. PubMed ID: 33465327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of cisplatin on distortion product otoacoustic emissions in Japanese patients.
Eiamprapai P; Yamamoto N; Hiraumi H; Ogino-Nishimura E; Kitamura M; Hirano S; Ito J
Laryngoscope; 2012 Jun; 122(6):1392-6. PubMed ID: 22555987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
