These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37702551)

  • 1. The Suicide Dot Probe Task: Psychometric properties and validity in relation to suicide-related outcomes.
    Rogers ML; Carosa CL; Haliczer LA; Hughes CD; Schofield CA; Armey MF
    Suicide Life Threat Behav; 2023 Dec; 53(6):1010-1024. PubMed ID: 37702551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Suicide-related construct accessibility and attention disengagement bias in suicide ideation.
    Rosario-Williams B; Akter S; Kaur S; Mirada R
    J Psychopathol Clin Sci; 2023 Feb; 132(2):173-184. PubMed ID: 36808961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Psychometric properties of the Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale (SIDAS) in a longitudinal sample of people experiencing non-affective psychosis.
    Harris K; Haddock G; Peters S; Gooding P
    BMC Psychiatry; 2021 Dec; 21(1):628. PubMed ID: 34915870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The psychometric properties of the dot-probe paradigm when used in pain-related attentional bias research.
    Dear BF; Sharpe L; Nicholas MK; Refshauge K
    J Pain; 2011 Dec; 12(12):1247-54. PubMed ID: 21982721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Extended testing with the dot-probe task increases test-retest reliability and validity.
    Aday JS; Carlson JM
    Cogn Process; 2019 Feb; 20(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 30171401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving the psychometric properties of dot-probe attention measures using response-based computation.
    Evans TC; Britton JC
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2018 Sep; 60():95-103. PubMed ID: 29580549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Suicidal ideation and attentional biases in children: An eye-tracking study.
    Tsypes A; Owens M; Gibb BE
    J Affect Disord; 2017 Nov; 222():133-137. PubMed ID: 28697418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing the Efficacy of Attention Bias Modification for Suicidal Thoughts: Findings From Two Experiments.
    Cha CB; Najmi S; Amir N; Matthews JD; Deming CA; Glenn JJ; Calixte RM; Harris JA; Nock MK
    Arch Suicide Res; 2017 Jan; 21(1):33-51. PubMed ID: 26984769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Psychometric Properties of the Suicide Stroop Task in a Chinese College Population.
    Niu L; Feng X; Jia Z; Yu Y; Zhou L
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():586391. PubMed ID: 33716857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perseverative Thinking about Suicide Questionnaire (PTSQ): Validation of a new measure to assess suicide-specific rumination.
    Höller I; Teismann T; Forkmann T
    Compr Psychiatry; 2022 Jan; 112():152287. PubMed ID: 34781079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Behavioral and ERP measures of attentional bias to threat in the dot-probe task: poor reliability and lack of correlation with anxiety.
    Kappenman ES; Farrens JL; Luck SJ; Proudfit GH
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1368. PubMed ID: 25538644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale: initial validity and internal consistency findings from three multisite studies with adolescents and adults.
    Posner K; Brown GK; Stanley B; Brent DA; Yershova KV; Oquendo MA; Currier GW; Melvin GA; Greenhill L; Shen S; Mann JJ
    Am J Psychiatry; 2011 Dec; 168(12):1266-77. PubMed ID: 22193671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two probes and better than one: Development of a psychometrically reliable variant of the attentional probe task.
    Grafton B; Teng S; MacLeod C
    Behav Res Ther; 2021 Mar; 138():103805. PubMed ID: 33485106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cognitive inhibition and attentional biases in the affective go/no-go performance of depressed, suicidal populations.
    Harfmann EJ; Rhyner KT; Ingram RE
    J Affect Disord; 2019 Sep; 256():228-233. PubMed ID: 31200162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Suicide Screening Questionnaire-Self-Rating (SSQ-SR): Development, reliability, and validity in a clinical sample of Korean adults.
    Yook V; Choi YH; Gu MJ; Lee D; Won H; Woo SY; Lee DH; Jeon HJ
    Compr Psychiatry; 2023 Feb; 121():152360. PubMed ID: 36508776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attentional Bias to Emotional Facial Expressions in Undergraduates With Suicidal Ideation: An ERP Study.
    Lin L; Liu Y; Mo J; Wang C; Liu T; Xu Z; Jiang Y; Bai X; Wu X
    Arch Suicide Res; 2023; 27(3):938-955. PubMed ID: 35787745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Examining the predictive utility of suicidal ideation characteristics in relation to real-time monitoring of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts at follow-up.
    Rogers ML; Bozzay ML; Hughes CD; Schatten HT; Armey MF
    Suicide Life Threat Behav; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38888350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of priming in a cued dot-probe task on appearance-related attentional biases in women.
    Lane BR; Mulgrew KE; Mahar D; White MJ; Loughnan SA
    Int J Eat Disord; 2017 Jul; 50(7):817-825. PubMed ID: 28252801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability (or lack thereof) of smartphone ecological momentary assessment of visual dot probe attention bias toward threat indices.
    Zainal NH; Jacobson NC
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2024 Mar; 82():101918. PubMed ID: 37907019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Test-retest reliability of attention bias for food: Robust eye-tracking and reaction time indices.
    van Ens W; Schmidt U; Campbell IC; Roefs A; Werthmann J
    Appetite; 2019 May; 136():86-92. PubMed ID: 30682381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.