These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3770279)

  • 1. Can the number of cesarean sections be reduced without risk? An analysis of rates and indications in a university clinic.
    Poisson-Salomon AS; Breart G; Maillard F; Rabarison Y; Chavigny C; Sureau C; Rumeau-Rouquette C
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1986 Sep; 22(5-6):297-307. PubMed ID: 3770279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Epidemiological surveillance and obstetrical dystocias surgery in Senegal].
    Bouillin D; Fournier G; Gueye A; Diadhiou F; Cissé CT
    Sante; 1994; 4(6):399-406. PubMed ID: 7850191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reversing the upward trend in the cesarean section rate.
    Peter J; Amir W; Eitan P
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1987 Jun; 25(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 3609425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cesarean section in the primigravid.
    Mesleh RA; Asiri F; Al-Naim MF
    Saudi Med J; 2000 Oct; 21(10):957-9. PubMed ID: 11369962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Indications for cesarean section].
    Stoll W
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1990 Feb; 120(8):255-9. PubMed ID: 2408143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cesarean sections in Alberta from April 1979 to March 1988.
    Saunders LD; Flowerdew G
    CMAJ; 1991 May; 144(10):1243-9, 1252. PubMed ID: 2025819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The contribution of dystocia to the cesarean section rate.
    Macara LM; Murphy KW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jul; 171(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 7794300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Indications for cesarean section in singleton pregnancies in two Danish counties with different cesarean section rates.
    Sperling LS; Henriksen TB; Ulrichsen H; Hedegård M; Møller H; Hansen V; Ovlisen B; Secher NJ
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1994 Feb; 73(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 8116351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cesarean section: analysis of the experience before and after the National Consensus Conference on Aspects of Cesarean Birth.
    Soliman SR; Burrows RF
    CMAJ; 1993 Apr; 148(8):1315-20. PubMed ID: 8462053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cesarean section rates and indications in Greece: data from a 24-year period in a teaching hospital.
    Tampakoudis P; Assimakopoulos E; Grimbizis G; Zafrakas M; Tampakoudis G; Mantalenakis S; Bontis J
    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2004; 31(4):289-92. PubMed ID: 15672970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Caesarean section dissected, 1978-1983.
    Yudkin PL; Redman CW
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Feb; 93(2):135-44. PubMed ID: 3947589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Caesarean birth rates worldwide. A search for determinants.
    van Roosmalen J; van der Does CD
    Trop Geogr Med; 1995; 47(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 7747325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cesarean section odds ratios.
    Simini F; Maillard F; Breart G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1990; 34(1-2):1-13. PubMed ID: 2406165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Incidence of and indications for cesarean sections in the Quebec, Canada region 1973 and 1979].
    Marcoux S; Fabia J
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1983; 31(4):459-68. PubMed ID: 6669773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evolution of the indications for cesarean section. Results of a retrospective study.
    Gentile G; Formelli G; Rinaldi AM; Palma S; Pelusi G
    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 1991; 18(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 1914206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Potential avoidability of planned cesarean sections in a French national database.
    Coulm B; Blondel B; Alexander S; Boulvain M; Le Ray C
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Sep; 93(9):905-12. PubMed ID: 24910420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cesarean section in twin pregnancies in two Danish counties with different cesarean section rates.
    Henriksen TB; Sperling L; Hedegaard M; Ulrichsen H; Ovlisen B; Secher NJ
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1994 Feb; 73(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 8116350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cesarean section; changing patterns in Saudi Arabia.
    Chattopadhyay SK; Sengupta PB; Edrees YB; Lambourne A
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1987 Oct; 25(5):387-94. PubMed ID: 2889633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The clininal management of breech presentation].
    Altmann P; Eklund-Grell K; Kucera H; Reinold E
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1975 Aug; 35(8):608-14. PubMed ID: 1175902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using the medical audit cycle to reduce cesarean section rates.
    Robson MS; Scudamore IW; Walsh SM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Jan; 174(1 Pt 1):199-205. PubMed ID: 8572006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.