These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37704952)

  • 21. Comparative Evaluation of Genome Assemblers from Long-Read Sequencing for Plants and Crops.
    Jung H; Jeon MS; Hodgett M; Waterhouse P; Eyun SI
    J Agric Food Chem; 2020 Jul; 68(29):7670-7677. PubMed ID: 32530283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A benchmarking of human mitochondrial DNA haplogroup classifiers from whole-genome and whole-exome sequence data.
    García-Olivares V; Muñoz-Barrera A; Lorenzo-Salazar JM; Zaragoza-Trello C; Rubio-Rodríguez LA; Díaz-de Usera A; Jáspez D; Iñigo-Campos A; González-Montelongo R; Flores C
    Sci Rep; 2021 Oct; 11(1):20510. PubMed ID: 34654896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effective extraction and assembly methods for simultaneously obtaining plastid and mitochondrial genomes.
    Hao W; Fan S; Hua W; Wang H
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e108291. PubMed ID: 25251391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Benchmark datasets for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance bioinformatics.
    Xiaoli L; Hagey JV; Park DJ; Gulvik CA; Young EL; Alikhan NF; Lawsin A; Hassell N; Knipe K; Oakeson KF; Retchless AC; Shakya M; Lo CC; Chain P; Page AJ; Metcalf BJ; Su M; Rowell J; Vidyaprakash E; Paden CR; Huang AD; Roellig D; Patel K; Winglee K; Weigand MR; Katz LS
    PeerJ; 2022; 10():e13821. PubMed ID: 36093336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. FastEtch: A Fast Sketch-Based Assembler for Genomes.
    Ghosh P; Kalyanaraman A
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2019; 16(4):1091-1106. PubMed ID: 28910776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mitochondrial genome sequencing, mapping, and assembly benchmarking for Culicoides species (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae).
    Milián-García Y; Hempel CA; Janke LAA; Young RG; Furukawa-Stoffer T; Ambagala A; Steinke D; Hanner RH
    BMC Genomics; 2022 Aug; 23(1):584. PubMed ID: 35962326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Systematic benchmark of state-of-the-art variant calling pipelines identifies major factors affecting accuracy of coding sequence variant discovery.
    Barbitoff YA; Abasov R; Tvorogova VE; Glotov AS; Predeus AV
    BMC Genomics; 2022 Feb; 23(1):155. PubMed ID: 35193511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessment of human diploid genome assembly with 10x Linked-Reads data.
    Zhang L; Zhou X; Weng Z; Sidow A
    Gigascience; 2019 Nov; 8(11):. PubMed ID: 31769805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A practical comparison of de novo genome assembly software tools for next-generation sequencing technologies.
    Zhang W; Chen J; Yang Y; Tang Y; Shang J; Shen B
    PLoS One; 2011 Mar; 6(3):e17915. PubMed ID: 21423806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Subset selection of high-depth next generation sequencing reads for de novo genome assembly using MapReduce framework.
    Fang CH; Chang YJ; Chung WC; Hsieh PH; Lin CY; Ho JM
    BMC Genomics; 2015; 16 Suppl 12(Suppl 12):S9. PubMed ID: 26678408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparative analysis of de novo assemblers for variation discovery in personal genomes.
    Tian S; Yan H; Klee EW; Kalmbach M; Slager SL
    Brief Bioinform; 2018 Sep; 19(5):893-904. PubMed ID: 28407084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessment of metrics in next-generation sequencing experiments for use in core-genome multilocus sequence type.
    Liu YY; Chen BH; Chen CC; Chiou CS
    PeerJ; 2021; 9():e11842. PubMed ID: 34466283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. GAM-NGS: genomic assemblies merger for next generation sequencing.
    Vicedomini R; Vezzi F; Scalabrin S; Arvestad L; Policriti A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013; 14 Suppl 7(Suppl 7):S6. PubMed ID: 23815503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparing de novo genome assembly: the long and short of it.
    Narzisi G; Mishra B
    PLoS One; 2011 Apr; 6(4):e19175. PubMed ID: 21559467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. B-assembler: a circular bacterial genome assembler.
    Huang F; Xiao L; Gao M; Vallely EJ; Dybvig K; Atkinson TP; Waites KB; Chong Z
    BMC Genomics; 2022 May; 23(Suppl 4):361. PubMed ID: 35546658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Linear time complexity de novo long read genome assembly with GoldRush.
    Wong J; Coombe L; Nikolić V; Zhang E; Nip KM; Sidhu P; Warren RL; Birol I
    Nat Commun; 2023 May; 14(1):2906. PubMed ID: 37217507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Organelle_PBA, a pipeline for assembling chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes from PacBio DNA sequencing data.
    Soorni A; Haak D; Zaitlin D; Bombarely A
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):49. PubMed ID: 28061749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Blue: correcting sequencing errors using consensus and context.
    Greenfield P; Duesing K; Papanicolaou A; Bauer DC
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Oct; 30(19):2723-32. PubMed ID: 24919879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of nine popular de novo assemblers in microbial genome assembly.
    Forouzan E; Maleki MSM; Karkhane AA; Yakhchali B
    J Microbiol Methods; 2017 Dec; 143():32-37. PubMed ID: 28939423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.