148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37705023)
1. Nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment for advanced gastric, gastroesophageal junction, and esophageal adenocarcinoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Zhang PF; Shi XQ; Li Q
Cost Eff Resour Alloc; 2023 Sep; 21(1):65. PubMed ID: 37705023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-Effectiveness of Nivolumab Plus Chemotherapy vs. Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Gastric Cancer/Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer/Esophagel Adenocarcinoma in China.
Shu Y; Ding Y; Zhang Q
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():851522. PubMed ID: 35515123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab plus standard chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for the first-line treatment of unresectable advanced or metastatic gastric cancer, gastroesophageal junction cancer, and esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Jiang Y; Li Y; Wang LXW
Int J Clin Pharm; 2022 Apr; 44(2):499-506. PubMed ID: 35088231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. First-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy
Cao X; Zhang M; Li N; Zheng B; Liu M; Song X; Cai H
Ther Adv Med Oncol; 2023; 15():17588359231171038. PubMed ID: 37223263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab or chemotherapy
Cao X; Cai H; Li N; Zheng B; Zheng Z; Liu M
Ther Adv Med Oncol; 2022; 14():17588359221122733. PubMed ID: 36147862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab combination therapy in the first-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma.
Liu S; Dou L; Wang K; Shi Z; Wang R; Zhu X; Song Z; Li S
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():899966. PubMed ID: 35936686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy for patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic HER2-negative gastric or gastroesophageal junction or esophageal adenocarcinoma in Japan.
Morimoto K; Moriwaki K; Shimozuma K; Nakayama T
J Gastroenterol; 2023 Dec; 58(12):1188-1197. PubMed ID: 37725256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy as first-line therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Shu Y; Ding Y; Li F; Zhang Q
Int Immunopharmacol; 2023 Jan; 114():109589. PubMed ID: 36700770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Second-Line Chemotherapy Agents for Advanced Gastric Cancer.
Lam SW; Wai M; Lau JE; McNamara M; Earl M; Udeh B
Pharmacotherapy; 2017 Jan; 37(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 27870079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness analysis of zolbetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 as the first-line treatment for CLDN18.2-positive, HER2-negative advanced gastric or Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma.
Huang Y; You M; Wu Q; Chen R
Front Pharmacol; 2023; 14():1238009. PubMed ID: 37719841
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.
Wan X; Zeng X; Peng L; Peng Y; Liu Q; Yi L; Luo X; Deng Q; Tan C
Front Pharmacol; 2021; 12():580459. PubMed ID: 34512315
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab plus ipilimumab plus two cycles of platinum-doublet chemotherapy versus platinum-doublet chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of stage IV or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer in the United States.
Polyzoi M; Sandhu H; Maervoet J; Yuan Y; Chaudhary MA; Varol N; Lee A; Dale P; Jones C; Lubinga SJ; Penrod JR
J Med Econ; 2022; 25(1):660-668. PubMed ID: 35658806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pembrolizumab in Patients With Advanced Esophageal Cancer Based on the KEYNOTE-181 Study.
Zhan M; Xu T; Zheng H; He Z
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():790225. PubMed ID: 35309225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-Effectiveness of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab as First-Line Therapy in Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer.
Hao X; Shen A; Wu B
Front Pharmacol; 2021; 12():573852. PubMed ID: 34290602
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Nivolumab Versus Docetaxel for Previously Treated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in China: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Liu Q; Luo X; Peng L; Yi L; Wan X; Zeng X; Tan C
Clin Drug Investig; 2020 Feb; 40(2):129-137. PubMed ID: 31679121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab-chemotherapy as first-line therapy for locally advanced/metastatic gastric cancer: a United States payer perspective.
Marupuru S; Arku D; Axon DR; Villa-Zapata L; Yaghoubi M; Slack MK; Warholak T
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2023; 23(7):831-841. PubMed ID: 37243493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness of sintilimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Liu L; Wang L; Chen L; Ding Y; Zhang Q; Shu Y
Front Immunol; 2023; 14():1092385. PubMed ID: 36756110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Toripalimab plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis.
Huo G; Liu W; Kang S; Chen P
Front Pharmacol; 2023; 14():1131219. PubMed ID: 36865925
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Difference in Cost-Effectiveness between First-Line and Third-Line or Later Nivolumab Therapy in Patients with HER2-Negative, Unresectable, Advanced or Recurrent Gastric or Gastro-Esophageal Junction Cancer in Japan.
Kashiwa M; Matsushita R
Biol Pharm Bull; 2022; 45(7):895-903. PubMed ID: 35786597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness analysis of sintilimab plus pemetrexed and platinum versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment in metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in China.
Liu H; Wang Y; He Q
Health Econ Rev; 2022 Dec; 12(1):66. PubMed ID: 36581793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
