These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37705203)
21. The role of caseload in determining outcome following laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection: an observational study. Burns EM; Mamidanna R; Currie A; Bottle A; Aylin P; Darzi A; Faiz OD Surg Endosc; 2014 Jan; 28(1):134-42. PubMed ID: 24052341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Variation in the volume-outcome relationship after rectal cancer surgery in the United States: Retrospective study with implications for regionalization. Becerra AZ; Aquina CT; Grunvald MW; Underhill JM; Bhama AR; Hayden DM Surgery; 2022 Oct; 172(4):1041-1047. PubMed ID: 34961602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The long-term oncological outcomes of the 140 robotic sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a single surgeon experience. Aliyev V; Tokmak H; Goksel S; Meric S; Acar S; Kaya H; Asoglu O J Robot Surg; 2020 Aug; 14(4):655-661. PubMed ID: 31811567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Do individual surgeon volumes affect outcomes in thoracic surgery?†. Harrison S; Sun T; Kamel MK; Cleary C; Stiles BM; Altorki NK; Sedrakyan A Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2019 Oct; 56(4):770-777. PubMed ID: 30927422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Hospital variation in sphincter-preservation rates in rectal cancer treatment: results of a population-based study in the Netherlands. Koëter T; de Nes LCF; Wasowicz DK; Zimmerman DDE; Verhoeven RHA; Elferink MA; de Wilt JHW BJS Open; 2021 Jul; 5(4):. PubMed ID: 34291288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The influence of hospital volume on long-term oncological outcome after rectal cancer surgery. Jonker FHW; Hagemans JAW; Burger JWA; Verhoef C; Borstlap WAA; Tanis PJ; Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Dec; 32(12):1741-1747. PubMed ID: 28884251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Referrals and Decision-Making Considerations Involved in Selecting a Surgeon for Rectal Cancer Treatment in the Midwestern United States. Del Vecchio NJ; Gao X; Weeks KS; Mengeling MA; Kahl AR; Gribovskaja-Rupp I; Lynch CF; Chrischilles EA; Charlton ME Dis Colon Rectum; 2022 Jul; 65(7):876-884. PubMed ID: 35001047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Uptake and outcomes of laparoscopically assisted resection for colon and rectal cancer in Australia: a population-based study. Dobbins TA; Young JM; Solomon MJ Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Apr; 57(4):415-22. PubMed ID: 24608296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of Access to Hospitals Most Ready to Achieve National Accreditation for Rectal Cancer Treatment. Antunez AG; Kanters AE; Regenbogen SE JAMA Surg; 2019 Jun; 154(6):516-523. PubMed ID: 30785616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Examining the transferability of colon and rectal operative experience on outcomes following laparoscopic rectal surgery. Lee JK; Doumouras AG; Springer JE; Eskicioglu C; Amin N; Cadeddu M; Hong D Surg Endosc; 2020 Mar; 34(3):1231-1236. PubMed ID: 31183793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Volume and outcome in rectal cancer surgery: the importance of quality management. Hohenberger W; Merkel S; Hermanek P Int J Colorectal Dis; 2013 Feb; 28(2):197-206. PubMed ID: 23143162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Risk Factors Associated With Circumferential Resection Margin Positivity in Rectal Cancer: A Binational Registry Study. Warrier SK; Kong JC; Guerra GR; Chittleborough TJ; Naik A; Ramsay RG; Lynch AC; Heriot AG Dis Colon Rectum; 2018 Apr; 61(4):433-440. PubMed ID: 29521824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Volume Pledge is Not Associated with Better Short-Term Outcomes After Lung Cancer Resection. Farjah F; Grau-Sepulveda MV; Gaissert H; Block M; Grogan E; Brown LM; Kosinski AS; Kozower BD J Clin Oncol; 2020 Oct; 38(30):3518-3527. PubMed ID: 32762615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Robotic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: A National Perspective on Short-term Oncologic Outcomes. Speicher PJ; Englum BR; Ganapathi AM; Nussbaum DP; Mantyh CR; Migaly J Ann Surg; 2015 Dec; 262(6):1040-5. PubMed ID: 25405559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Does surgeon case volume influence nonfatal adverse outcomes after rectal cancer resection? Billingsley KG; Morris AM; Green P; Dominitz JA; Matthews B; Dobie SA; Barlow W; Baldwin LM J Am Coll Surg; 2008 Jun; 206(6):1167-77. PubMed ID: 18501815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Associations between hospital and surgeon procedure volumes and patient outcomes after ovarian cancer resection. Schrag D; Earle C; Xu F; Panageas KS; Yabroff KR; Bristow RE; Trimble EL; Warren JL J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Feb; 98(3):163-71. PubMed ID: 16449676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Hospital and surgeon procedure volume as predictors of outcome following rectal cancer resection. Schrag D; Panageas KS; Riedel E; Cramer LD; Guillem JG; Bach PB; Begg CB Ann Surg; 2002 Nov; 236(5):583-92. PubMed ID: 12409664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Time to rethink surgeon-specific outcome data for colorectal surgeons in England: Cross-sectional data of 73,842 resections for colorectal cancer. Hureibi K; Evans C; Wong L; Ain Q Int J Surg; 2018 Sep; 57():101-104. PubMed ID: 30142386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Aspects of survival from colorectal cancer in Denmark. Iversen LH Dan Med J; 2012 Apr; 59(4):B4428. PubMed ID: 22459726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Association between surgeon case volume and years of practice experience with open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair outcomes. Scali ST; Arnaoutakis DJ; Neal D; Giles KA; Goodney PP; Suckow BD; Powell RJ; Columbo JA; Back MR; Berceli SA; Beck AW; Upchurch GR; Huber TS; Stone DH J Vasc Surg; 2021 Apr; 73(4):1213-1226.e2. PubMed ID: 32707388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]