117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37705235)
1. Improvements in networking processes for hip or knee revision arthroplasty: a silver lining of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Chatterji U; Puttock D; Kheiran A; Sandean D; Mundy G; Menon D; Brown A
Hip Int; 2024 Mar; 34(2):168-173. PubMed ID: 37705235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of revision data for total hip and knee replacements undertaken at a high volume orthopaedic centre against data held on the National Joint Registry.
Afzal I; Radha S; Smoljanović T; Stafford GH; Twyman R; Field RE
J Orthop Surg Res; 2019 Oct; 14(1):318. PubMed ID: 31601231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of COVID-19 on hip and knee arthroplasty surgical volume in China.
Wei Z; Xu Y; Feng B; Weng X
Int Orthop; 2024 Jan; 48(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 37632527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Revision total knee replacement: A two-year review of complexity data and regional workload in South West England.
Reynolds PM; Phillips JRA; Evans JT; Searle D; Sword ; Toms AD
Knee; 2021 Aug; 31():22-27. PubMed ID: 34111798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Surgical Volume in 2020 in Poland.
Czubak-Wrzosek M; Czubak J; Grzelecki D; Tyrakowski M
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Aug; 18(16):. PubMed ID: 34444581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prioritising of hip and knee arthroplasty procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic: the European Hip Society and the European Knee Associates Survey of Members.
Thaler M; Kort N; Zagra L; Hirschmann MT; Khosravi I; Liebensteiner M; Karachalios T; Tandogan RN
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2021 Oct; 29(10):3159-3163. PubMed ID: 33433635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Revision knee arthroplasty: Can good outcomes be achieved at lower volumes?
Haughton DN; Wheelton AN; McLauchlan GJ
Knee; 2021 Jun; 30():63-69. PubMed ID: 33873087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The successful and safe conversion of joint arthroplasty to same-day surgery: A necessity after the COVID-19 pandemic.
Habbous S; Waddell J; Hellsten E
PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0290135. PubMed ID: 38011077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of a revision arthroplasty network on patient outcomes.
Bloch BV; Matar HE; Berber R; Gray WK; Briggs TWR; James PJ; Manktelow ARJ;
Bone Joint J; 2023 Jun; 105-B(6):641-648. PubMed ID: 37257848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of COVID-19 on Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Surgical Volume in the United States.
Bedard NA; Elkins JM; Brown TS
J Arthroplasty; 2020 Jul; 35(7S):S45-S48. PubMed ID: 32381441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002.
Kurtz S; Mowat F; Ong K; Chan N; Lau E; Halpern M
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 Jul; 87(7):1487-97. PubMed ID: 15995115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The relationship between the American Society Of Anesthesiologists physical rating and outcome following total hip and knee arthroplasty: an analysis of theNew Zealand Joint Registry.
Hooper GJ; Rothwell AG; Hooper NM; Frampton C
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jun; 94(12):1065-70. PubMed ID: 22717825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Poor Knee-specific and Generic Patient-reported Outcome Measure Scores at 6 Months Are Associated With Early Revision Knee Arthroplasty: A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
Ackerman IN; Harris IA; Cashman K; Rowden N; Lorimer M; Graves SE
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Oct; 480(10):1899-1909. PubMed ID: 35901436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is the Survivorship of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Better Than Selected Conventional Hip Arthroplasties in Men Younger Than 65 Years of Age? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
Stoney J; Graves SE; de Steiger RN; Rainbird S; Kelly TL; Hatton A
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Nov; 478(11):2625-2636. PubMed ID: 32898048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Influence of institutional experience on results in hip and knee total arthroplasty : An analysis from the German arthroplasty registry (EPRD)].
Steinbrück A; Grimberg A; Melsheimer O; Jansson V
Orthopade; 2020 Sep; 49(9):808-814. PubMed ID: 32885289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Revision for unexplained pain following unicompartmental and total knee replacement.
Baker PN; Petheram T; Avery PJ; Gregg PJ; Deehan DJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Sep; 94(17):e126. PubMed ID: 22992855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimal usage of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a study of 41,986 cases from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.
Liddle AD; Pandit H; Judge A; Murray DW
Bone Joint J; 2015 Nov; 97-B(11):1506-11. PubMed ID: 26530653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Towards UK poSt Arthroplasty Follow-up rEcommendations (UK SAFE): protocol for an evaluation of the requirements for arthroplasty follow-up, and the production of consensus-based recommendations.
Czoski Murray CJ; Kingsbury SR; Arden NK; Hewison J; Judge A; Matu J; O'Shea J; Pinedo-Villanueva R; Smith LK; Smith C; Thomas CM; West RM; Wright JM; Conaghan PG; Stone MH
BMJ Open; 2019 Jun; 9(6):e031351. PubMed ID: 31243039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical prioritisation of revision knee surgical procedures: BASK working group consensus document.
Kalson NS; Mathews JA; Toms AD; Murray JRD;
Knee; 2021 Jan; 28():57-63. PubMed ID: 33307320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Early Results From the American Joint Replacement Registry: A Comparison With Other National Registries.
Heckmann N; Ihn H; Stefl M; Etkin CD; Springer BD; Berry DJ; Lieberman JR
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Jul; 34(7S):S125-S134.e1. PubMed ID: 30711371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
