These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37705452)

  • 1. A conceptual-perceptual distinctiveness processing account of the superior recognition memory of pictures over environmental sounds.
    Ahmad FN; Tremblay S; Karkuszewski MD; Alvi M; Hockley WE
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Jul; 77(7):1555-1580. PubMed ID: 37705452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Increasing word distinctiveness eliminates the picture superiority effect in recognition: Evidence for the physical-distinctiveness account.
    Ensor TM; Surprenant AM; Neath I
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Jan; 47(1):182-193. PubMed ID: 30182328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The fidelity of visual and auditory memory.
    Gloede ME; Gregg MK
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1325-1332. PubMed ID: 30937831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Listening to the Picture-Superiority Effect.
    Ensor TM; Bancroft TD; Hockley WE
    Exp Psychol; 2019 Mar; 66(2):134-153. PubMed ID: 30895914
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gist-based conceptual processing of pictures remains intact in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment.
    Deason RG; Hussey EP; Budson AE; Ally BA
    Neuropsychology; 2012 Mar; 26(2):202-8. PubMed ID: 22229341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Directed forgetting for categorised pictures: recognition memory for perceptual details versus gist.
    Ahmad FN; Tan P; Hockley WE
    Memory; 2019 Aug; 27(7):894-903. PubMed ID: 30849286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An auditory analog of the picture superiority effect.
    Crutcher RJ; Beer JM
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Jan; 39(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 21264626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of varying presentation time on long-term recognition memory for scenes: Verbatim and gist representations.
    Ahmad FN; Moscovitch M; Hockley WE
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Apr; 45(3):390-403. PubMed ID: 27858379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of humor on memory for non-sensical pictures.
    Takahashi M; Inoue T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Sep; 132(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 19591969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Experience and information loss in auditory and visual memory.
    Gloede ME; Paulauskas EE; Gregg MK
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jul; 70(7):1344-1352. PubMed ID: 27118246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The organization of words and environmental sounds in memory.
    Hendrickson K; Walenski M; Friend M; Love T
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Mar; 69():67-76. PubMed ID: 25624059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Individual differences in forced-choice recognition memory: partitioning contributions of recollection and familiarity.
    Migo EM; Quamme JR; Holmes S; Bendell A; Norman KA; Mayes AR; Montaldi D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(11):2189-206. PubMed ID: 24796268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptual and conceptual priming of environmental sounds.
    Schirmer A; Soh YH; Penney TB; Wyse L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Nov; 23(11):3241-53. PubMed ID: 21281092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of survival processing on memory for pictures depends on how memory is tested.
    Dewhurst SA; Anderson RJ; O'Connor RJ; Dean GM
    Memory; 2023 Apr; 31(4):502-508. PubMed ID: 36705639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neighing, barking, and drumming horses-object related sounds help and hinder picture naming.
    Mädebach A; Wöhner S; Kieseler ML; Jescheniak JD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1629-1646. PubMed ID: 28414498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Category superiority effects and the processing of auditory images.
    Sharps MJ; Pollitt BK
    J Gen Psychol; 1998 Apr; 125(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 9778835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A hybrid-similarity exemplar model for predicting distinctiveness effects in perceptual old-new recognition.
    Nosofsky RM; Zaki SR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1194-209. PubMed ID: 14622055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. False recognition modality effects in short-term memory: Reversing the auditory advantage.
    Lim LCL; Goh WD
    Cognition; 2019 Dec; 193():104008. PubMed ID: 31252074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Localizing semantic interference from distractor sounds in picture naming: A dual-task study.
    Mädebach A; Kieseler ML; Jescheniak JD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1909-1916. PubMed ID: 29030759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conceptual distinctiveness supports detailed visual long-term memory for real-world objects.
    Konkle T; Brady TF; Alvarez GA; Oliva A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 Aug; 139(3):558-78. PubMed ID: 20677899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.