132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37706656)
1. Developing an extended producer responsibility system for solid waste management in Jordan using multi-criteria decision-making approach.
Abu-Qdais H; Al-Saleh M
Waste Manag Res; 2023 Sep; ():734242X231198444. PubMed ID: 37706656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of economic instruments for countries with low municipal waste management performance: An approach based on the analytic hierarchy process.
Kling M; Seyring N; Tzanova P
Waste Manag Res; 2016 Sep; 34(9):912-22. PubMed ID: 27121417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Management of the construction and demolition waste (CDW) and determination of the best disposal alternative by FAHP (Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process): A case study of Tehran, Iran.
Past V; Yaghmaeian K; Naderi M; Naderi N
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2023 Apr; 73(4):271-284. PubMed ID: 36880989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Application of Delphi-AHP methods to select the priorities of WEEE for recycling in a waste management decision-making tool.
Kim M; Jang YC; Lee S
J Environ Manage; 2013 Oct; 128():941-8. PubMed ID: 23892135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A GIS-based novel approach for suitable sanitary landfill site selection using integrated fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and machine learning algorithms.
Mohsin M; Ali SA; Shamim SK; Ahmad A
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 May; 29(21):31511-31540. PubMed ID: 35001277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of GIS-based AHP and fuzzy AHP methods for hospital site selection: a case study for Prayagraj City, India.
Tripathi AK; Agrawal S; Gupta RD
GeoJournal; 2022; 87(5):3507-3528. PubMed ID: 34075269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Circular economy through waste reverse logistics under extended producer responsibility in Finland.
Mayanti B; Helo P
Waste Manag Res; 2024 Jan; 42(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 37119145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Extended producer responsibility in developing economies: Assessment of promoting factors through retail electronic firms for sustainable e-waste management.
Faibil D; Asante R; Agyemang M; Addaney M; Baah C
Waste Manag Res; 2023 Jan; 41(1):117-142. PubMed ID: 35892190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Integrated AHP-TOPSIS under a Fuzzy Environment for the Selection of Waste-To-Energy Technologies in Ghana: A Performance Analysis and Socio-Enviro-Economic Feasibility Study.
Afrane S; Ampah JD; Agyekum EB; Amoh PO; Yusuf AA; Fattah IMR; Agbozo E; Elgamli E; Shouran M; Mao G; Kamel S
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jul; 19(14):. PubMed ID: 35886280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multi criteria decision making to select the best method for the preparation of solid lipid nanoparticles of rasagiline mesylate using analytic hierarchy process.
Kunasekaran V; Krishnamoorthy K
J Adv Pharm Technol Res; 2014 Jul; 5(3):115-21. PubMed ID: 25126532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Landfill site selection for sustainable solid waste management using multiple-criteria decision-making. Case study: Al-Balqa governorate in Jordan.
Arabeyyat OS; Shatnawi N; Shbool MA; Shraah AA
MethodsX; 2024 Jun; 12():102591. PubMed ID: 38357637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Circular economy of medical waste: novel intelligent medical waste management framework based on extension linear Diophantine fuzzy FDOSM and neural network approach.
Chew X; Khaw KW; Alnoor A; Ferasso M; Al Halbusi H; Muhsen YR
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 May; 30(21):60473-60499. PubMed ID: 37036648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Landfill site selection by integrating fuzzy logic, AHP, and WLC method based on multi-criteria decision analysis.
Zarin R; Azmat M; Naqvi SR; Saddique Q; Ullah S
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Apr; 28(16):19726-19741. PubMed ID: 33410005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Benchmarking Canadian solid waste management system integrating fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) with efficacy methods.
Kabir G; Ahmed SK; Aalirezaei A; Ng KTW
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jul; 29(34):51578-51588. PubMed ID: 35243580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A novel fuzzy framework for technology selection of sustainable wastewater treatment plants based on TODIM methodology in developing urban areas.
Eseoglu G; Yapsakli K; Tozan H; Vayvay O
Sci Rep; 2022 May; 12(1):8800. PubMed ID: 35614159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multi-criteria decision support framework for sustainable implementation of effective green supply chain management practices.
Boutkhoum O; Hanine M; Boukhriss H; Agouti T; Tikniouine A
Springerplus; 2016; 5(1):664. PubMed ID: 27350904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Determination of the most appropriate fertilizing method for apple trees using multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches.
Heidarisoltanabadi M; Elhami B; Imanmehr A; Khadivi A
Food Sci Nutr; 2024 Feb; 12(2):1158-1169. PubMed ID: 38370082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of waste management and energy saving for sustainable green building through analytic hierarchy process and artificial neural network model.
Lu Y; Ge Y; Zhang G; Abdulwahab A; Salameh AA; Ali HE; Nguyen Le B
Chemosphere; 2023 Mar; 318():137708. PubMed ID: 36621688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Provision of extended producer responsibility system for products packaging: A case study of Iran.
Jalalipour H; Ahmadi M; Jaafarzadeh N; Morscheck G; Narra S; Nelles M
Waste Manag Res; 2021 Oct; 39(10):1291-1301. PubMed ID: 34407698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Examining the concept of convenient collection: an application to extended producer responsibility and product stewardship frameworks.
Wagner TP
Waste Manag; 2013 Mar; 33(3):499-507. PubMed ID: 22818910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
