These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37708337)

  • 1. Improvement in quality of life of transfemoral amputees: Comparison between 2 types of transfemoral sockets and their influence on functionality and user comfort - A case report.
    Bartolomeu N; Gonzalez J; Valentim F; Reis E Silva M; Ramos N; Jacinto J
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2024 Jun; 48(3):344-347. PubMed ID: 37708337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The development and internal consistency of the comprehensive lower limb amputee socket survey in active lower limb amputees.
    Gailey R; Kristal A; Lucarevic J; Harris S; Applegate B; Gaunaurd I
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Feb; 43(1):80-87. PubMed ID: 30095355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Osseointegrated Prosthetic Implants for People With Lower-Limb Amputation: A Health Technology Assessment.
    Ontario Health (Quality)
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2019; 19(7):1-126. PubMed ID: 31911825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Walking ability and quality of life in subjects with transfemoral amputation: a comparison of osseointegration with socket prostheses.
    Van de Meent H; Hopman MT; Frölke JP
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Nov; 94(11):2174-8. PubMed ID: 23774380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Northwestern University Flexible Subischial Vacuum Socket for persons with transfemoral amputation: Part 2 Description and Preliminary evaluation.
    Fatone S; Caldwell R
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):246-250. PubMed ID: 28132589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Integration of surface electromyographic sensors with the transfemoral amputee socket: a comparison of four differing configurations.
    Hefferman GM; Zhang F; Nunnery MJ; Huang H
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Apr; 39(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 24469430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Case study: survey of patient satisfaction with prosthesis quality and design among below-knee prosthetic leg socket users.
    Mohd Hawari N; Jawaid M; Md Tahir P; Azmeer RA
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2017 Nov; 12(8):868-874. PubMed ID: 28068847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Motion of the residual femur within the socket during gait is associated with patient-reported problems in transfemoral amputees.
    Gale T; Yang S; McGough R; Fiedler G; Anderst W
    J Biomech; 2020 Nov; 112():110050. PubMed ID: 33035840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the new, patient-adjustable socket system Varos in the early phase of prosthetic rehabilitation: a pilot study.
    Nia A; Toetschinger G; Kubinec T; Domayer S
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2022 Jun; 58(3):462-469. PubMed ID: 35148042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Ischial Containment and Subischial Sockets on Comfort, Function, Quality of Life, and Satisfaction With Device in Persons With Unilateral Transfemoral Amputation: A Randomized Crossover Trial.
    Fatone S; Caldwell R; Angelico J; Stine R; Kim KY; Gard S; Oros M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2021 Nov; 102(11):2063-2073.e2. PubMed ID: 34214499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The benefits of using a vacuum-assisted socket system to improve balance and gait in elderly transtibial amputees.
    Samitier CB; Guirao L; Costea M; Camós JM; Pleguezuelos E
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Feb; 40(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 25261489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of transhumeral socket designs utilizing patient assessment and in vivo skeletal and socket motion tracking: a case study.
    Resnik L; Patel T; Cooney SG; Crisco JJ; Fantini C
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2016; 11(5):423-32. PubMed ID: 25425411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of the transfemoral prosthetic socket interface designs on skeletal motion and socket comfort: A randomized clinical trial.
    Kahle J; Miro RM; Ho LT; Porter M; Lura DJ; Carey SL; Lunseth P; Highsmith J; Highsmith MJ
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2020 Jun; 44(3):145-154. PubMed ID: 32308126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Survey of transfemoral amputee experience and priorities for the user-centered design of powered robotic transfemoral prostheses.
    Fanciullacci C; McKinney Z; Monaco V; Milandri G; Davalli A; Sacchetti R; Laffranchi M; De Michieli L; Baldoni A; Mazzoni A; Paternò L; Rosini E; Reale L; Trecate F; Crea S; Vitiello N; Gruppioni E
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2021 Dec; 18(1):168. PubMed ID: 34863213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of prosthetic mobility and balance in transfemoral amputees with bone-anchored prosthesis vs. socket prosthesis.
    Gailey RS; Kristal A; Al Muderis M; Lučarević J; Clemens S; Applegate EB; Isaacson BM; Pasquina PF; Symsack A; Gaunaurd IA
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2023 Apr; 47(2):130-136. PubMed ID: 36701197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Energy cost of walking in transfemoral amputees: Comparison between Marlo Anatomical Socket and Ischial Containment Socket.
    Traballesi M; Delussu AS; Averna T; Pellegrini R; Paradisi F; Brunelli S
    Gait Posture; 2011 Jun; 34(2):270-4. PubMed ID: 21684165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gait, cost and time implications for changing from PTB to ICEX sockets.
    Datta D; Harris I; Heller B; Howitt J; Martin R
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2004 Aug; 28(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 15382805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative study of conventional and energy-storing prosthetic feet in high-functioning transfemoral amputees.
    Graham LE; Datta D; Heller B; Howitt J; Pros D
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Jun; 88(6):801-6. PubMed ID: 17532907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Within-subject effects of standardized prosthetic socket modifications on physical function and patient-reported outcomes.
    Anderst W; Fiedler G; Onishi K; McKernan G; Gale T; Paulus P
    Trials; 2022 Apr; 23(1):299. PubMed ID: 35413866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Scoping Review of Pressure Measurements in Prosthetic Sockets of Transfemoral Amputees during Ambulation: Key Considerations for Sensor Design.
    Ko ST; Asplund F; Zeybek B
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jul; 21(15):. PubMed ID: 34372253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.