BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37709352)

  • 41. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic effectiveness of positron emission tomography-computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging in the post-treatment surveillance of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
    Zhu Y; McLaren O; Hardman J; Evans J; Williams R
    J Laryngol Otol; 2023 Jan; 137(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 35086577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Inter- and Intrareader Agreement of NI-RADS in the Interpretation of Surveillance Contrast-Enhanced CT after Treatment of Oral Cavity and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
    Elsholtz FHJ; Ro SR; Shnayien S; Erxleben C; Bauknecht HC; Lenk J; Schaafs LA; Hamm B; Niehues SM
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2020 May; 41(5):859-865. PubMed ID: 32327436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Positive Predictive Value of Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System Categories 3 and 4 Posttreatment FDG-PET/CT in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
    Wangaryattawanich P; Branstetter BF; Ly JD; Duvvuri U; Heron DE; Rath TJ
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2020 Jun; 41(6):1070-1075. PubMed ID: 32467187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A systematic review and meta-analysis of predictive and prognostic models for outcome prediction using positron emission tomography radiomics in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients.
    Philip MM; Welch A; McKiddie F; Nath M
    Cancer Med; 2023 Aug; 12(15):16181-16194. PubMed ID: 37353996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of diagnostic performance and inter-reader agreement between PI-RADS v2.1 and PI-RADS v2: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lee CH; Vellayappan B; Tan CH
    Br J Radiol; 2022 Mar; 95(1131):20210509. PubMed ID: 34520694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The diagnostic performance of CT and MRI for detecting extranodal extension in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis.
    Park SI; Guenette JP; Suh CH; Hanna GJ; Chung SR; Baek JH; Lee JH; Choi YJ
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Apr; 31(4):2048-2061. PubMed ID: 32949282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Impact of PI-RADS Category 3 lesions on the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for detecting prostate cancer and the prevalence of prostate cancer within each PI-RADS category: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wadera A; Alabousi M; Pozdnyakov A; Kashif Al-Ghita M; Jafri A; McInnes MD; Schieda N; van der Pol CB; Salameh JP; Samoilov L; Gusenbauer K; Alabousi A
    Br J Radiol; 2021 Feb; 94(1118):20191050. PubMed ID: 33002371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of diagnostic performance between two prostate imaging reporting and data system versions: A systematic review.
    Li W; Xin C; Zhang L; Dong A; Xu H; Wu Y
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 May; 114():111-119. PubMed ID: 31005160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Positive Predictive Value of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Mazzone E; Stabile A; Pellegrino F; Basile G; Cignoli D; Cirulli GO; Sorce G; Barletta F; Scuderi S; Bravi CA; Cucchiara V; Fossati N; Gandaglia G; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Oct; 4(5):697-713. PubMed ID: 33358543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Accuracy of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System in Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Image Analysis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma or Overall Malignancy-A Systematic Review.
    van der Pol CB; Lim CS; Sirlin CB; McGrath TA; Salameh JP; Bashir MR; Tang A; Singal AG; Costa AF; Fowler K; McInnes MDF
    Gastroenterology; 2019 Mar; 156(4):976-986. PubMed ID: 30445016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Validity of 3-Tesla diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for distinction of reactive and metastatic lymph nodes in head-and-neck carcinoma.
    Vijayalakshmi K; Raghuram PH; Saravanan K; Krithika CL; Kannan A
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2020; 16(3):587-593. PubMed ID: 32719272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The role of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score in Gleason 3 + 3 active surveillance candidates enrollment: a diagnostic meta-analysis.
    Zhai L; Fan Y; Meng Y; Feng X; Yu W; Jin J
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2019 May; 22(2):235-243. PubMed ID: 30429594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Accuracy of computed tomography in the prediction of extracapsular spread of lymph node metastases in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
    Chai RL; Rath TJ; Johnson JT; Ferris RL; Kubicek GJ; Duvvuri U; Branstetter BF
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Nov; 139(11):1187-94. PubMed ID: 24076619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Development and Validation of a Model Using Radiomics Features from an Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Map to Diagnose Local Tumor Recurrence in Patients Treated for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
    Kim M; Lee JH; Joo L; Jeong B; Kim S; Ham S; Yun J; Kim N; Chung SR; Choi YJ; Baek JH; Lee JY; Kim JH
    Korean J Radiol; 2022 Nov; 23(11):1078-1088. PubMed ID: 36126954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Risk Stratification of Prostate Cancer According to PI-RADS® Version 2 Categories: Meta-Analysis for Prospective Studies.
    Park KJ; Choi SH; Lee JS; Kim JK; Kim MH; Jeong IG
    J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1141-1149. PubMed ID: 32716687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. LI-RADS LR-5 on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography has satisfactory diagnostic specificity for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Jin H; Cai Y; Zhang M; Huang L; Bao W; Hu Q; Chen X; Zhou L; Ling W
    Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Feb; 13(2):957-969. PubMed ID: 36819240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Performance of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1 for Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Park KJ; Choi SH; Kim MH; Kim JK; Jeong IG
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Jul; 54(1):103-112. PubMed ID: 33576169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Multi-Institutional Validation of Deep Learning for Pretreatment Identification of Extranodal Extension in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
    Kann BH; Hicks DF; Payabvash S; Mahajan A; Du J; Gupta V; Park HS; Yu JB; Yarbrough WG; Burtness BA; Husain ZA; Aneja S
    J Clin Oncol; 2020 Apr; 38(12):1304-1311. PubMed ID: 31815574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Diagnostic Performance of CT/MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System v2017 for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Lee S; Kim SS; Roh YH; Choi JY; Park MS; Kim MJ
    Liver Int; 2020 Jun; 40(6):1488-1497. PubMed ID: 32145134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.