These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37709665)

  • 1. [“It’s possible”: reducing the coercion in care for adults living with neurodevelopmental disorders: a mixed-methods study].
    Billé V; Gonsalvès C; Lamarche-Vadel A; Verdoux H
    Rech Soins Infirm; 2023; 153(2):40-59. PubMed ID: 37709665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mental health nurses' emotions, exposure to patient aggression, attitudes to and use of coercive measures: Cross sectional questionnaire survey.
    Jalil R; Huber JW; Sixsmith J; Dickens GL
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2017 Oct; 75():130-138. PubMed ID: 28797822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methodological issues in monitoring the use of coercive measures.
    Janssen WA; van de Sande R; Noorthoorn EO; Nijman HL; Bowers L; Mulder CL; Smit A; Widdershoven GA; Steinert T
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2011; 34(6):429-38. PubMed ID: 22079087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Coercion in psychiatry: A cross-sectional study on staff views and emotions.
    Krieger E; Moritz S; Lincoln TM; Fischer R; Nagel M
    J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2021 Apr; 28(2):149-162. PubMed ID: 32348607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of Seclusion and Restraint in Adult Psychiatry: A Systematic Review.
    Chieze M; Hurst S; Kaiser S; Sentissi O
    Front Psychiatry; 2019; 10():491. PubMed ID: 31404294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical course and prevalence of coercive measures: an observational study among involuntarily hospitalised psychiatric patients.
    Hotzy F; Moetteli S; Theodoridou A; Schneeberger AR; Seifritz E; Hoff P; Jäger M
    Swiss Med Wkly; 2018; 148():w14616. PubMed ID: 29698543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Post-seclusion/post-restraint debriefing with patients-overview and current situation].
    Krieger E; Fischer R; Moritz S; Nagel M
    Nervenarzt; 2021 Jan; 92(1):44-49. PubMed ID: 32725493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acceptability and use of coercive methods across differing service configurations with and without seclusion and/or psychiatric intensive care units.
    Pettit SA; Bowers L; Tulloch A; Cullen AE; Moylan LB; Sethi F; McCrone P; Baker J; Quirk A; Stewart D
    J Adv Nurs; 2017 Apr; 73(4):966-976. PubMed ID: 27809370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of nursing staff attitudes and characteristics on the use of coercive measures in acute mental health services-A systematic review.
    Doedens P; Vermeulen J; Boyette LL; Latour C; de Haan L
    J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2020 Aug; 27(4):446-459. PubMed ID: 31876970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nurses' and consumers' shared experiences of seclusion and restraint: A qualitative literature review.
    Hawsawi T; Power T; Zugai J; Jackson D
    Int J Ment Health Nurs; 2020 Oct; 29(5):831-845. PubMed ID: 32198811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of coercive measures in adolescent psychiatric inpatient treatment: a nation-wide register study.
    Ulla S; Maritta V; Riittakerttu KH
    Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol; 2012 Sep; 47(9):1401-8. PubMed ID: 22113718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Seclusion versus mechanical restraint in psychiatry - a systematic review.
    Gleerup CS; Østergaard SD; Hjuler RS
    Acta Neuropsychiatr; 2019 Oct; 31(5):237-245. PubMed ID: 31190673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Effects of the Decision of the German Constitutional Court on mechanical restraint in 2018 : Coercive measures in the psychiatric hospitals in Baden-Wuerttemberg in 2019 compared to the years 2015-2017].
    Steinert T; Hirsch S; Flammer E
    Nervenarzt; 2022 Jul; 93(7):706-712. PubMed ID: 35303128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Seclusion as a coercive measure in suicidality - daily routine or exception?
    Gavrilovic Haustein N; Freudiger M; Hunziker A; Hepp U; Jellestad L; von Känel R; Stulz N
    BMC Psychiatry; 2022 Jun; 22(1):431. PubMed ID: 35752775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Freedom Restrictive Coercive Measures in Forensic Psychiatry.
    Flammer E; Frank U; Steinert T
    Front Psychiatry; 2020; 11():146. PubMed ID: 32194460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A cross-sectional prospective study of seclusion, restraint and involuntary medication in acute psychiatric wards: patient, staff and ward characteristics.
    Husum TL; Bjørngaard JH; Finset A; Ruud T
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2010 Apr; 10():89. PubMed ID: 20370928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomized controlled comparison of seclusion and mechanical restraint in inpatient settings.
    Bergk J; Einsiedler B; Flammer E; Steinert T
    Psychiatr Serv; 2011 Nov; 62(11):1310-7. PubMed ID: 22211210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patients' attitudes towards and acceptance of coercion in psychiatry.
    Krieger E; Moritz S; Weil R; Nagel M
    Psychiatry Res; 2018 Feb; 260():478-485. PubMed ID: 29287276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Safety hazards in patient seclusion events in psychiatric care: A video observation study.
    Varpula J; Välimäki M; Lantta T; Berg J; Soininen P; Lahti M
    J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2022 Apr; 29(2):359-373. PubMed ID: 34536315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A 15-year national follow-up: legislation is not enough to reduce the use of seclusion and restraint.
    Keski-Valkama A; Sailas E; Eronen M; Koivisto AM; Lönnqvist J; Kaltiala-Heino R
    Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 42(9):747-52. PubMed ID: 17598058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.