137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37711038)
1. Diagnostic concordance between traditional and digital workflows. A study on 1427 prostate biopsies.
Torresani E; Gentilini MA; Grassi S; Cima L; Pedrolli I; Cai T; Puglisi M; Vattovani V; Guadin B; Brunelli M; Doglioni C; Barbareschi M
Pathologica; 2023 Aug; 115(4):221-226. PubMed ID: 37711038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of Whole Slide Imaging for primary surgical pathology diagnosis of prostate biopsies.
Rao V; Subramanian P; Sali AP; Menon S; Desai SB
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2021; 64(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 33433413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast Cancer Prognostic Factors in the Digital Era: Comparison of Nottingham Grade using Whole Slide Images and Glass Slides.
Davidson TM; Rendi MH; Frederick PD; Onega T; Allison KH; Mercan E; Brunyé TT; Shapiro LG; Weaver DL; Elmore JG
J Pathol Inform; 2019; 10():11. PubMed ID: 31057980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of Digital Pathologic Analysis vs Traditional Microscopy in the Interpretation of Melanocytic Lesions.
Onega T; Barnhill RL; Piepkorn MW; Longton GM; Elder DE; Weinstock MA; Knezevich SR; Reisch LM; Carney PA; Nelson HD; Radick AC; Elmore JG
JAMA Dermatol; 2018 Oct; 154(10):1159-1166. PubMed ID: 30140929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic validation of a portable whole slide imaging scanner for lymphoma diagnosis in resource-constrained setting: A cross-sectional study.
Mremi A; Achola C; Mbwambo D; Magorosa E; Legason ID; Vavoulis D; El Mouden C; Schuh A; Mnango L;
J Pathol Inform; 2023; 14():100188. PubMed ID: 36714453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility in digital and routine microscopic assessment of prostate needle biopsies.
Rodriguez-Urrego PA; Cronin AM; Al-Ahmadie HA; Gopalan A; Tickoo SK; Reuter VE; Fine SW
Hum Pathol; 2011 Jan; 42(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 20970164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interinstitutional whole slide imaging teleconsultation service development: assessment using internal training and clinical consultation cases.
Jones NC; Nazarian RM; Duncan LM; Kamionek M; Lauwers GY; Tambouret RH; Wu CL; Nielsen GP; Brachtel EF; Mark EJ; Sadow PM; Grabbe JP; Wilbur DC
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2015 May; 139(5):627-35. PubMed ID: 25415180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study.
Bulten W; Pinckaers H; van Boven H; Vink R; de Bel T; van Ginneken B; van der Laak J; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Litjens G
Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):233-241. PubMed ID: 31926805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intra-observer reproducibility of whole slide imaging for the primary diagnosis of breast needle biopsies.
Reyes C; Ikpatt OF; Nadji M; Cote RJ
J Pathol Inform; 2014; 5(1):5. PubMed ID: 24741464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Platform for Prostate Cancer Grading and Quantification.
Huang W; Randhawa R; Jain P; Iczkowski KA; Hu R; Hubbard S; Eickhoff J; Basu H; Roy R
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2132554. PubMed ID: 34730818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Utility of whole slide imaging and virtual microscopy in prostate pathology.
Camparo P; Egevad L; Algaba F; Berney DM; Boccon-Gibod L; Compérat E; Evans AJ; Grobholz R; Kristiansen G; Langner C; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Oliveira P; Vainer B; Varma M
APMIS; 2012 Apr; 120(4):298-304. PubMed ID: 22429212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of a computerized quantitative quality control tool for whole slide images of kidney biopsies.
Chen Y; Zee J; Smith A; Jayapandian C; Hodgin J; Howell D; Palmer M; Thomas D; Cassol C; Farris AB; Perkinson K; Madabhushi A; Barisoni L; Janowczyk A
J Pathol; 2021 Mar; 253(3):268-278. PubMed ID: 33197281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inter-observer agreement between two observers for bovine digital dermatitis identification in New Zealand using digital photographs.
Yang DA; Laven RA
N Z Vet J; 2019 May; 67(3):143-147. PubMed ID: 30753789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An artificial intelligence algorithm for prostate cancer diagnosis in whole slide images of core needle biopsies: a blinded clinical validation and deployment study.
Pantanowitz L; Quiroga-Garza GM; Bien L; Heled R; Laifenfeld D; Linhart C; Sandbank J; Albrecht Shach A; Shalev V; Vecsler M; Michelow P; Hazelhurst S; Dhir R
Lancet Digit Health; 2020 Aug; 2(8):e407-e416. PubMed ID: 33328045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic Accuracy of Virtual Pathology vs Traditional Microscopy in a Large Dermatopathology Study.
Kent MN; Olsen TG; Feeser TA; Tesno KC; Moad JC; Conroy MP; Kendrick MJ; Stephenson SR; Murchland MR; Khan AU; Peacock EA; Brumfiel A; Bottomley MA
JAMA Dermatol; 2017 Dec; 153(12):1285-1291. PubMed ID: 29049424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Digital Biopsy with Fluorescence Confocal Microscope for Effective Real-time Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Prospective, Comparative Study.
Rocco B; Sighinolfi MC; Sandri M; Spandri V; Cimadamore A; Volavsek M; Mazzucchelli R; Lopez-Beltran A; Eissa A; Bertoni L; Azzoni P; Reggiani Bonetti L; Maiorana A; Puliatti S; Micali S; Paterlini M; Iseppi A; Rocco F; Pellacani G; Chester J; Bianchi G; Montironi R
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Oct; 4(5):784-791. PubMed ID: 32952095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of a Portable Whole-Slide Imaging System for Frozen Section Diagnosis.
Kaushal RK; Rajaganesan S; Rao V; Sali A; More B; Desai SB
J Pathol Inform; 2021; 12():33. PubMed ID: 34760330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of whole-slide imaging in the primary diagnosis of liver biopsies in a University Hospital.
Saco A; Diaz A; Hernandez M; Martinez D; Montironi C; Castillo P; Rakislova N; Del Pino M; Martinez A; Ordi J
Dig Liver Dis; 2017 Nov; 49(11):1240-1246. PubMed ID: 28780052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A whole-slide imaging based workflow reduces the reading time of pathologists.
Baidoshvili A; Khacheishvili M; van der Laak JAWM; van Diest PJ
Pathol Int; 2023 Mar; 73(3):127-134. PubMed ID: 36692113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. SOCS3 Immunohistochemical Expression Seems to Support the 2005 and 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Modified Gleason Grading System.
Pierconti F; Martini M; Cenci T; Petrone GL; Ricci R; Sacco E; Bassi PF; Larocca LM
Prostate; 2017 May; 77(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 28144985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
