BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3771159)

  • 21. Large-screen image intensifier photofluorography compared with full-size screen-film technique in chest radiography.
    Manninen H; Rytkönen H; Soimakallio S; Terho EO; Hentunen J
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1985; 26(5):525-33. PubMed ID: 4072746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Plain radiography with a rare-earth screen: comparison with calcium tungstate screen.
    Picus D; McAlister WH; Smith E; Rodewald S; Jost RG; Evens RG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Dec; 143(6):1335-8. PubMed ID: 6333800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Adaptation of the Panorex II for use with rare earth screen-film combinations.
    Ponce AZ; McDavid WD; Lundeen RC; Morris CR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Jun; 61(6):645-8. PubMed ID: 3459997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [High intensification film-screen systems in thoracic diagnosis. A clinical comparative study].
    Schäfer CB; Sokiranski R; Claussen CD
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Nov; 5(6):389-93. PubMed ID: 8580141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Ultra-low-dose routine pediatric radiography utilizing a rare-earth filter.
    Wesenberg RL; Amundson GM; Mueller DL; Coupland SG
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1987 Sep; 38(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 2958463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of rare earth filtration on patient exposure, dose reduction, and image quality in oral panoramic radiology.
    Tyndall DA; Washburn DB
    Health Phys; 1987 Jan; 52(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 3804740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of a new type of high sharpness film for skull radiography.
    Honda E; Yoshino N; Chiba R; Sasaki T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 May; 20(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 1936417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. National survey with regard to preferred image characteristics of various types of intensifying screens.
    van der Zwaag H
    Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1984; 53(4):215-20. PubMed ID: 6565544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fast Fourier digital quantum mottle analysis with application to rare earth intensifying screen systems.
    Wagner RF
    Med Phys; 1977; 4(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 850512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of an asymmetric screen-film system for chest radiography.
    Morishita J; MacMahon H; Doi K; Carlin M; Sukenobu Y
    Med Phys; 1994 Nov; 21(11):1769-75. PubMed ID: 7891639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Rare-earth screens versus calcium tungstate screens.
    Wilson RA
    Radiology; 1983 Apr; 147(1):288-9. PubMed ID: 6828754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparing image quality of flat-panel chest radiography with storage phosphor radiography and film-screen radiography.
    Ganten M; Radeleff B; Kampschulte A; Daniels MD; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jul; 181(1):171-6. PubMed ID: 12818852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of x-radiation doses between conventional and rare earth panoramic radiographic techniques.
    Skoczylas LJ; Preece JW; Langlais RP; McDavid WD; Waggener RG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Dec; 68(6):776-81. PubMed ID: 2594329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A sensitometric comparison of Kodak Ektavision and Fuji Super HR-S panoramic radiographic films.
    Wakoh M; Farman AG; Kitagawa H; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Aug; 86(2):249-53. PubMed ID: 9720103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Rare-earth and calcium tungstate intensifying screens, a comparative study of relative speed, radiation doses and resolving power.
    de Carvalho A; Jørgensen J
    Rofo; 1978 Mar; 128(3):358-63. PubMed ID: 147838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Sharpness of detail and density in film-screen systems].
    Maurer HJ; Goos F
    Rontgenblatter; 1986 Sep; 39(9):260-3. PubMed ID: 3775203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of a new ultraviolet-emitting rare-earth film-screen combination.
    Farajollahi AR; Sutton D
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Jun; 70(834):629-34. PubMed ID: 9227257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Portable chest imaging: comparison of storage phosphor digital, asymmetric screen-film, and conventional screen-film systems.
    Niklason LT; Chan HP; Cascade PN; Chang CL; Chee PW; Mathews JF
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 8421740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Temperature dependence of x-ray induced luminescence from medical x-ray screens.
    Shearer DR; Rowe LE
    Med Phys; 1987; 14(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 3587138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Resolution of several screen-film combinations in rotational panoramic radiography.
    McDavid WD; Morris CR; Tronje G; Welander U
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Jun; 61(6):629-34. PubMed ID: 3459994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.