These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3771159)

  • 41. A comparison of the diagnostic utility of two image receptors for panoramic radiography.
    Carmichael FA; Hirschmann PN; Scaife B; Sheard L; Mackenzie A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 10654038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Thoracic radiographs with the AMBER system. A comparison of the diagnostic image quality of film-screen and storage-phosphor radiographs on the grid-partition stand and the AMBER system].
    Busch HP; Hartmann J; Freund MC; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M; Richter K
    Rofo; 1992 Mar; 156(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 1550921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Image information transfer properties of x-ray intensifying screens in the energy range from 17 to 320 keV.
    Ginzburg A; Dick CE
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(4):1013-21. PubMed ID: 8413008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of imaging properties of a computed radiography system and screen-film systems.
    Sanada S; Doi K; Xu XW; Yin FF; Giger ML; MacMahon H
    Med Phys; 1991; 18(3):414-20. PubMed ID: 1870484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [New imaging methods in thoracic diagnosis. A study to evaluate digital storage screen radiography, the slit technique ("AMBER"), asymmetric ("InSight") and conventional film-screen techniques].
    Lehmann KJ; Busch HP; Drescher P; Loose R; Georgi M
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 8448224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Clinical comparison of high-speed rare-earth screen and par-speed screen for diagnostic efficacy and radiation dosage.
    Robinson T; Becker JA; Olson AP
    Radiology; 1982 Oct; 145(1):214-6. PubMed ID: 6821592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Optimisation of patient radiation protection in conventional X-ray imaging procedures using film reject analysis: a demonstration of the importance of rare earth screen-film systems.
    Inkoom S; Schandorf C; Fletcher JJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Sep; 136(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 19737839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Film-screen digital radiography.
    Schwenker RP; Eger H
    Radiography; 1985; 51(598):233-5. PubMed ID: 4048409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose.
    Rill LN; Brateman L; Arreola M
    Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2727-35. PubMed ID: 14596311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
    MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
    Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparison of stimulable phosphor technology and conventional screen-film technology in pediatric scoliosis.
    Stringer DA; Cairns RA; Poskitt KJ; Bray H; Milner R; Kennedy B
    Pediatr Radiol; 1994; 24(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 8008484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Scoliosis examinations: organ dose and image quality with rare-earth screen-film systems.
    Fearon T; Vucich J; Butler P; McSweeney WJ; Taylor GA; Markle BM; Hoe J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Feb; 150(2):359-62. PubMed ID: 3257326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Clinical evaluation of asymmetric film-screen system for thoracic lesions].
    Shimizu T; Yamamoto K; Ogura Y; Aratake K; Nakata Y; Saika Y; Sagami A; Ashina K; Sueyoshi K; Narabayashi I
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 May; 54(6):465-70. PubMed ID: 8028952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Experimental evaluation of screen-film combinations for intraoral panoramic radiography.
    Molander B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1986; 15(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 3470222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [A new rare earth intensifying screen: lanthanum oxybromide (Quanta III - Dupont): relative speed, resolution and image quality (author's transl)].
    Bergamini C; Laudicina L; Marengo M; Pavlica P; Viglietta G; Zanini M
    Radiol Med; 1980 Oct; 66(10):699-704. PubMed ID: 7221029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Comparative study of screen-film combinations used in conventional radiography].
    Malchair F; Longtain F; Gordenne W
    J Belge Radiol; 1988; 71(4):451-6. PubMed ID: 3215896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [An economic comparison between digital luminescence radiography and conventional film processing in intensive care medicine].
    Peters PE; Dykstra DE; Wiesmann W; Schlüchtermann J; Adam D
    Radiologe; 1992 Nov; 32(11):536-40. PubMed ID: 1461981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Importance of rare earth screens for optimizing radiographic imaging quality].
    Keller U
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1986 Jan; 41(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 3460773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Physical and psychophysical criteria for the evaluation of the quality of radiographic images].
    Borasi G; Delpiano S; Landini A; Orsini S; Papagni L; Tosi G
    Radiol Med; 1982 May; 68(5):401-7. PubMed ID: 7111792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.