These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3771378)
1. Detection of pure-tone amplitude modulation as a function of sensation level from 8 to 14 kHz. Long GR; Cullen JK Hear Res; 1986; 24(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 3771378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intensity difference limens at high frequencies. Long GR; Cullen JK J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Aug; 78(2):507-13. PubMed ID: 4031249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Loudness perception and frequency discrimination in subjects with steeply sloping hearing loss: possible correlates of neural plasticity. McDermott HJ; Lech M; Kornblum MS; Irvine DR J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Oct; 104(4):2314-25. PubMed ID: 10491696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A method for relating loudness-matching and intensity-discrimination data. Schlauch RS; Wier CC J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Mar; 30(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 3560891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Auditory temporal integration in the normal-hearing and hearing-impaired cat. Solecki JM; Gerken GM J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):779-85. PubMed ID: 2212303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Steady-state evoked responses to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated sounds recorded in man. Rees A; Green GG; Kay RH Hear Res; 1986; 23(2):123-33. PubMed ID: 3745015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Loudness adaptation at high frequencies. MiĆkiewicz A; Scharf B; Hellman R; Meiselman C J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Sep; 94(3 Pt 1):1281-6. PubMed ID: 8408968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tone decay for hearing-impaired listeners with and without dead regions in the cochlea. Huss M; Moore BC J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Dec; 114(6 Pt 1):3283-94. PubMed ID: 14714809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The acoustic reflex threshold: not predictive for loudness perception in normally-hearing listeners. Olsen SO; Rasmussen AN; Nielsen LH; Borgkvist BV Audiology; 1999; 38(6):303-7. PubMed ID: 10582530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of frequency and rate modulation by the chinchilla. Long GR; Clark WW J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Apr; 75(4):1184-90. PubMed ID: 6725767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of spread of excitation on the detection of amplitude modulation imposed on sinusoidal carriers at high levels. Millman RE; Bacon SP J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1008-16. PubMed ID: 18247903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of pure-tone forward masking on overshoot. Hicks ML; Bacon SP J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):228-30. PubMed ID: 1880293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reaction time to 1- and 4-kHz tones as a function of sensation level in listeners with normal hearing. Epstein M; Florentine M Ear Hear; 2006 Aug; 27(4):424-9. PubMed ID: 16825891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Critical modulation frequency based on detection of AM versus FM tones. Schorer E J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Apr; 79(4):1054-7. PubMed ID: 3700860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Auditory frequency and intensity discrimination in pigmented rats. Syka J; Rybalko N; Brozek G; Jilek M Hear Res; 1996 Oct; 100(1-2):107-13. PubMed ID: 8922984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intensity discrimination of pulsed tones by the goldfish (Carassius auratus). Fay RR J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):500-2. PubMed ID: 2921423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]