These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3771396)

  • 1. Yield grades and cutability of carcass beef with and without kidney and pelvic fat.
    Crouse JD; Koch RM; Dikeman ME
    J Anim Sci; 1986 Oct; 63(4):1134-9. PubMed ID: 3771396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of live and carcass equations predicting percentage of cutability, retail product weight, and trimmable fat in beef cattle.
    Herring WO; Williams SE; Bertrand JK; Benyshek LL; Miller DC
    J Anim Sci; 1994 May; 72(5):1107-18. PubMed ID: 8056655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An evaluation of the lamb vision system as a predictor of lamb carcass red meat yield percentage.
    Brady AS; Belk KE; LeValley SB; Dalsted NL; Scanga JA; Tatum JD; Smith GC
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Jun; 81(6):1488-98. PubMed ID: 12817497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimates of beef carcass intermuscular fat.
    Kent KR; Davis GW; Ramsey CB; Schluter AR
    J Anim Sci; 1991 Dec; 69(12):4836-44. PubMed ID: 1808178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simulated instrument augmentation of USDA yield grade application to beef carcasses.
    Belk KE; Scanga JA; Tatum JD; Wise JW; Smith GC
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Feb; 76(2):522-7. PubMed ID: 9498361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Coupling of image analysis and tenderness classification to simultaneously evaluate carcass cutability, longissimus area, subprimal cut weights, and tenderness of beef.
    Shackelford SD; Wheeler TL; Koohmaraie M
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Oct; 76(10):2631-40. PubMed ID: 9814904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characterization of biological types of cattle (Cycle VI): carcass, yield, and longissimus palatability traits.
    Wheeler TL; Cundiff LV; Shackelford SD; Koohmaraie M
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Apr; 82(4):1177-89. PubMed ID: 15080341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Beef carcass composition of slaughter cattle differing in frame size, muscle score, and external fatness.
    May SG; Mies WL; Edwards JW; Williams FL; Wise JW; Morgan JB; Savell JW; Cross HR
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Aug; 70(8):2431-45. PubMed ID: 1506305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relative contributions of subcutaneous and intermuscular fat to yields and predictability of retail product, fat trim, and bone in beef carcasses.
    Dikeman ME; Cundiff LV; Gregory KE; Kemp KE; Koch RM
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Jun; 76(6):1604-12. PubMed ID: 9655580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction of retail product and trimmable fat yields from the four primal cuts in beef cattle using ultrasound or carcass data.
    Tait RG; Wilson DE; Rouse GH
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Jun; 83(6):1353-60. PubMed ID: 15890812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Yield grade and carcass weight effects on the cutability of lamb carcasses fabricated into innovative style subprimals.
    Garrett RP; Savell JW; Cross HR; Johnson HK
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Jun; 70(6):1829-39. PubMed ID: 1634407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gluteus medius and rump fat depths as additional live animal ultrasound measurements for predicting retail product and trimmable fat in beef carcasses.
    Realini CE; Williams RE; Pringle TD; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Jun; 79(6):1378-85. PubMed ID: 11424672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimates of subprimal yields from beef carcasses as affected by USDA grades, subcutaneous fat trim level, and carcass sex class and type.
    Griffin DB; Savell JW; Morgan JB; Garrett RP; Cross HR
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Aug; 70(8):2411-30. PubMed ID: 1506304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting beef carcass cutability.
    Shackelford SD; Cundiff LV; Gregory KE; Koohmaraie M
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Feb; 73(2):406-13. PubMed ID: 7601772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting percentage of retail yield from carcass measurements, the yield grading equation, and closely trimmed, boxed beef weights.
    Reiling BA; Rouse GH; Duello DA
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Jul; 70(7):2151-8. PubMed ID: 1644688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A summary review of carcass cutability data comparing primal value of immunologically and physically castrated barrows.
    Harsh BN; Cowles B; Johnson RC; Pollmann DS; Schroeder AL; Dilger AC; Boler DD
    Transl Anim Sci; 2017 Feb; 1(1):77-89. PubMed ID: 32704631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of body condition score on carcass characteristics and subprimal yield from cull beef cows.
    Apple JK; Davis JC; Stephenson J; Hankins JE; Davis JR; Beaty SL
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Oct; 77(10):2660-9. PubMed ID: 10521025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of dietary ractopamine hydrochloride and zilpaterol hydrochloride supplementation on performance, carcass traits, and carcass cutability in beef steers.
    Arp TS; Howard ST; Woerner DR; Scanga JA; McKenna DR; Kolath WH; Chapman PL; Tatum JD; Belk KE
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Feb; 92(2):836-43. PubMed ID: 24664571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Technical note: the United States Department of Agriculture beef yield grade equation requires modification to reflect the current longissimus muscle area to hot carcass weight relationship.
    Lawrence TE; Farrow RL; Zollinger BL; Spivey KS
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Jun; 86(6):1434-8. PubMed ID: 18310492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of slaughter cow composition using live animal and carcass traits.
    O'Mara FM; Williams SE; Tatum JD; Hilton GG; Pringle TD; Wise JW; Williams FL
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Jun; 76(6):1594-603. PubMed ID: 9655579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.