146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37715874)
1. Low E-visibility of embryologists on fertility clinic websites: a web-based cross-sectional study.
Choucair F; Atilan O; Almohammadi A; Younis N; Al Hourani A; Curchoe CL; Raad G
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2023 Nov; 40(11):2619-2626. PubMed ID: 37715874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of United States fertility clinic websites according to the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM)/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) guidelines.
Abusief ME; Hornstein MD; Jain T; ;
Fertil Steril; 2007 Jan; 87(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 17081534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology advertising guidelines: How are member clinics doing?
Sauerbrun-Cutler MT; Brown EC; Huber WJ; Has P; Frishman GN
Fertil Steril; 2021 Jan; 115(1):104-109. PubMed ID: 33069369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What is the quality of information on social oocyte cryopreservation provided by websites of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology member fertility clinics?
Avraham S; Machtinger R; Cahan T; Sokolov A; Racowsky C; Seidman DS
Fertil Steril; 2014 Jan; 101(1):222-6. PubMed ID: 24140039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Direct-to-consumer advertising of success rates for medically assisted reproduction: a review of national clinic websites.
Wilkinson J; Vail A; Roberts SA
BMJ Open; 2017 Jan; 7(1):e012218. PubMed ID: 28082363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The educational and professional status of clinical embryology and clinical embryologists in Europe.
Kovačič B; Plas C; Woodward BJ; Verheyen G; Prados FJ; Hreinsson J; De los Santos MJ; Magli MC; Lundin K; Plancha CE
Hum Reprod; 2015 Aug; 30(8):1755-62. PubMed ID: 26071417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reporting assisted reproductive technology success rates on Australian and New Zealand fertility clinic websites.
Goodman LK; Prentice LR; Chanati R; Farquhar C
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Feb; 60(1):135-140. PubMed ID: 32052410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality of fertility clinic websites.
Huang JY; Discepola F; Al-Fozan H; Tulandi T
Fertil Steril; 2005 Mar; 83(3):538-44. PubMed ID: 15749475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysing adherence to guidelines for time-lapse imaging information on UK fertility clinic websites.
Perrotta M; Zampino L; Geampana A; Bhide P
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2024 Dec; 27(1):2346595. PubMed ID: 38769878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A document analysis of 'Adverse incidents in fertility clinics: lessons to learn' reports published by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority between 2010-2015.
Steen J
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Jul; 38(5):735. PubMed ID: 29944048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Claims for fertility interventions: a systematic assessment of statements on UK fertility centre websites.
Spencer EA; Mahtani KR; Goldacre B; Heneghan C
BMJ Open; 2016 Nov; 6(11):e013940. PubMed ID: 27890866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The prevalence, promotion and pricing of three IVF add-ons on fertility clinic websites.
van de Wiel L; Wilkinson J; Athanasiou P; Harper J
Reprod Biomed Online; 2020 Nov; 41(5):801-806. PubMed ID: 32888824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Education of the clinical embryology laboratory professional: development of a novel program delivered in a laboratory medicine department.
Shapiro H; Brown TJ; Chronis-Brown P; Hamilton GS; Bentley DC; Kandel R; Gotlieb AI
F S Rep; 2023 Sep; 4(3):262-269. PubMed ID: 37719097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An assessment of oncofertility content on reproductive endocrinology and infertility clinic websites.
Mujumdar V; Shivashankar K; Madding R; Levy AT; Gordhandas S; Rosenblum NG; Richard S; Monseur B
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2022 Apr; 39(4):957-962. PubMed ID: 35217946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender content on reproductive endocrinology and infertility clinic websites.
Wu HY; Yin O; Monseur B; Selter J; Collins LJ; Lau BD; Christianson MS
Fertil Steril; 2017 Jul; 108(1):183-191. PubMed ID: 28579417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. "Add-Ons" for Assisted Reproductive Technology: Do Patients Get Honest Information from Fertility Clinics' Websites?
Galiano V; Orvieto R; Machtinger R; Nahum R; Garzia E; Sulpizio P; Marconi AM; Seidman D
Reprod Sci; 2021 Dec; 28(12):3466-3472. PubMed ID: 33939166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accessing publicly funded donor insemination treatment in the UK: is funding information available on fertility clinic websites?
Taylor F; Turner-Moore R; Pacey A; Jones G
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2023 Jul; 26(3):512-518. PubMed ID: 37161825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. ESHRE Clinical Embryologist certification: the first 10 years.
Kovačič B; Prados FJ; Plas C; Woodward BJ; Verheyen G; Ramos L; Mäkinen S; Apter SJ; Vidal F; Ziebe S; Magli MC; Lundin K; Sunde A; Plancha CE
Hum Reprod Open; 2020; 2020(3):hoaa026. PubMed ID: 32864474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. VALUE study: a protocol for a qualitative semi-structured interview study of IVF add-ons use by patients, clinicians and embryologists in the UK and Australia.
Armstrong SC; Lensen S; Vaughan E; Wainwright E; Peate M; Balen AH; Farquhar CM; Pacey A
BMJ Open; 2021 May; 11(5):e047307. PubMed ID: 34020980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of the characteristics, motivations, preferences and expectations of men donating sperm online or through a sperm bank.
Graham S; Freeman T; Jadva V
Hum Reprod; 2019 Nov; 34(11):2208-2218. PubMed ID: 31711146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
