143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37716248)
1. Less is more? One-stage versus two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.
van der Wielen A; Negenborn V; Burchell GL; Remmelzwaal S; Lapid O; Driessen C
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 Nov; 86():109-127. PubMed ID: 37716248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of an evidence-based approach to the use of acellular dermal matrix in immediate expander-implant-based breast reconstruction.
Ganesh Kumar N; Berlin NL; Kim HM; Hamill JB; Kozlow JH; Wilkins EG
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2021 Jan; 74(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 33172826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Multi Centre Canadian Acellular Dermal Matrix Trial (MCCAT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial in implant-based breast reconstruction.
Zhong T; Temple-Oberle C; Hofer SO; Beber B; Semple J; Brown M; Macadam S; Lennox P; Panzarella T; McCarthy C; Baxter N;
Trials; 2013 Oct; 14():356. PubMed ID: 24165392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Systematic Review of the Impact of Acellular Dermal Matrix on Aesthetics and Patient Satisfaction in Tissue Expander-to-Implant Breast Reconstructions.
DeLong MR; Tandon VJ; Farajzadeh M; Berlin NL; MacEachern MP; Rudkin GH; Da Lio AL; Cederna PS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Dec; 144(6):967e-974e. PubMed ID: 31764630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Review: Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy for Breast Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Prospective Studies Comparing Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM) Versus Without ADM.
Ng TP; Loo BYK; Yong N; Chia CLK; Lohsiriwat V
Ann Surg Oncol; 2024 May; 31(5):3366-3376. PubMed ID: 38285304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Early complications and implant loss in implant-based breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix (Tecnoss Protexa®): a comparative study.
Potter S; Chambers A; Govindajulu S; Sahu A; Warr R; Cawthorn S
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 24011501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Immediate-implant-based-breast-reconstruction with two-stage expander-implant reconstruction versus one-stage-reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: analysis of patients' satisfaction.
Innocenti A; Melita D; Affortunati M; Susini T; Innocenti M
Acta Biomed; 2021 Jul; 92(3):e2021228. PubMed ID: 34212931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Economic analysis and review of the literature on implant-based breast reconstruction with and without the use of the acellular dermal matrix.
Bank J; Phillips NA; Park JE; Song DH
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2013 Dec; 37(6):1194-201. PubMed ID: 24091489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does the use of acellular dermal matrices (ADM) in women undergoing pre-pectoral implant-based breast reconstruction increase operative success versus non-use of ADM in the same setting? A systematic review protocol.
Cook H; Zargaran D; Glynou SP; Hamilton S; Mosahebi A
Syst Rev; 2024 Jun; 13(1):153. PubMed ID: 38849880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sub-muscular Reconstruction after NAC Sparing Mastectomy: Direct to Implant Breast Reconstruction with Human ADM Versus Tissue Expander.
Sgarzani R; Pasquali S; Buggi F; Tognali D; Marongiu F; Mingozzi M; Melandri D; Morselli PG; Curcio A
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Apr; 45(2):413-420. PubMed ID: 33078212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of Partial- Versus Full-Sling Acellular Dermal Matrix Use in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Head-to-Head Comparison.
Lee KT; Eom Y; Mun GH; Bang SI; Jeon BJ; Pyon JK
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2018 Apr; 42(2):422-433. PubMed ID: 29368031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Short-term cost-effectiveness of one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage expander-implant reconstruction from a multicentre randomized clinical trial.
Negenborn VL; Smit JM; Dikmans REG; Winters HAH; Twisk JWR; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MAM; Tuinder S; Eltahir Y; Posch NAS; van Steveninck-Barends JM; van der Hulst RRWJ; Ritt MJPF; Bouman MB; Mullender MG
Br J Surg; 2019 Apr; 106(5):586-595. PubMed ID: 30835827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A retrospective review of submuscular implant-based breast reconstruction: The influence of dermal matrix (ADM) on complications and aesthetic outcomes.
Kelley RS; Duraes EFR; Scomacao IR; Van Dijck P; Fahradyan V; Rambhia S; Moreira AA; Djohan RS; Schwarz GS; Bernard SL
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Nov; 75(11):4117-4124. PubMed ID: 36117132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acellular Dermal Matrix-sparing Direct-to-implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study Including Cost Analysis.
Viezel-Mathieu A; Alnaif N; Aljerian A; Safran T; Brabant G; Boileau JF; Dionisopoulos T
Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Feb; 84(2):139-143. PubMed ID: 31335468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Updated Evidence of Acellular Dermal Matrix Use for Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis.
Lee KT; Mun GH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Feb; 23(2):600-10. PubMed ID: 26438439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Do we need acellular dermal matrix in prepectoral breast reconstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Nolan IT; Farajzadeh MM; Boyd CJ; Bekisz JM; Gibson EG; Salibian AA
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 Nov; 86():251-260. PubMed ID: 37793198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality of life and patient satisfaction after one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage breast reconstruction (BRIOS): primary outcome of a randomised, controlled trial.
Negenborn VL; Young-Afat DA; Dikmans REG; Smit JM; Winters HAH; Don Griot JPW; Twisk JWR; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MAM; Lapid O; Moerman E; van Turnhout AAWM; Ritt MJPF; Bouman MB; Mullender MG
Lancet Oncol; 2018 Sep; 19(9):1205-1214. PubMed ID: 30104147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction compared with immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction augmented with an acellular dermal matrix: an open-label, phase 4, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.
Dikmans RE; Negenborn VL; Bouman MB; Winters HA; Twisk JW; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MA; Smit JM; Tuinder S; Eltahir Y; Posch NA; van Steveninck-Barends JM; Meesters-Caberg MA; van der Hulst RR; Ritt MJ; Mullender MG
Lancet Oncol; 2017 Feb; 18(2):251-258. PubMed ID: 28012977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Multicenter Assessment of Risks and Benefits.
Sorkin M; Qi J; Kim HM; Hamill JB; Kozlow JH; Pusic AL; Wilkins EG
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Dec; 140(6):1091-1100. PubMed ID: 28806288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality of life, pain of prepectoral and subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction with a discussion on cost: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ching AH; Lim K; Sze PW; Ooi A
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Aug; 75(8):2550-2560. PubMed ID: 35393263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
