153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37716250)
21. Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.
Graziano FD; Lu J; Sbitany H
Clin Plast Surg; 2023 Apr; 50(2):235-242. PubMed ID: 36813401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. An Algorithmic Approach to Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Version 2.0.
Antony AK; Robinson EC
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 May; 143(5):1311-1319. PubMed ID: 31033812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Acellular Dermal Matrix-sparing Direct-to-implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study Including Cost Analysis.
Viezel-Mathieu A; Alnaif N; Aljerian A; Safran T; Brabant G; Boileau JF; Dionisopoulos T
Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Feb; 84(2):139-143. PubMed ID: 31335468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prepectoral Immediate Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction with Anterior AlloDerm Coverage.
Jones G; Yoo A; King V; Jao B; Wang H; Rammos C; Elwood E
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Dec; 140(6S Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction):31S-38S. PubMed ID: 29166345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Relationship between Animation Deformity and Patient-Reported Outcomes: Application of the BREAST-Q to a Quantitative Stratification of Animation Severity.
Fracol M; Qiu CS; Chiu MW; Feld LN; Sood R; Mioton LM; Kearney A; Kim JYS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Jan; 145(1):11-17. PubMed ID: 31577656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A Prospective Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes of Subpectoral and Prepectoral Strattice-Based Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
Baker BG; Irri R; MacCallum V; Chattopadhyay R; Murphy J; Harvey JR
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 May; 141(5):1077-1084. PubMed ID: 29697602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The P1 Method: Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction to Minimize the Palpable Implant Edge and Upper Pole Rippling.
Pittman TA; Abbate OA; Economides JM
Ann Plast Surg; 2018 May; 80(5):487-492. PubMed ID: 29489539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Complications Following Subpectoral Versus Prepectoral Breast Augmentation: A Meta-analysis.
Li S; Mu D; Liu C; Xin M; Fu S; Xu B; Li Z; Qi J; Luan J
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2019 Aug; 43(4):890-898. PubMed ID: 31139912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis.
Li Y; Xu G; Yu N; Huang J; Long X
Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Oct; 85(4):437-447. PubMed ID: 31913902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Technical Refinements and Outcomes Assessment in Prepectoral Pocket Conversion After Postmastectomy Radiotherapy.
Pagliara D; Rubino C; Grieco F; Pili N; Serra PL; Schiavone L; Lattanzi M; Montella RA; Rinaldi PM; Ribuffo D; De Santis G; Salgarello M
Aesthet Surg J; 2024 May; 44(6):624-632. PubMed ID: 38299427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Direct to Implant Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
Mirhaidari SJ; Azouz V; Wagner DS
Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Mar; 84(3):263-270. PubMed ID: 31663934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prepectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction with complete ADM or synthetic mesh coverage - 36-Months follow-up in 200 reconstructed breasts.
Reitsamer R; Peintinger F; Klaassen-Federspiel F; Sir A
Breast; 2019 Dec; 48():32-37. PubMed ID: 31491673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Optimizing Outcomes in 2-Stage Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Utilizing Round Form-Stable Implants.
Sbitany H; Lee KR
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jul; 144(1S Utilizing a Spectrum of Cohesive Implants in Aesthetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery):43S-50S. PubMed ID: 31246760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A retrospective comparative analysis of risk factors and outcomes in direct-to-implant and two-stages prepectoral breast reconstruction: BMI and radiotherapy as new selection criteria of patients.
Casella D; Di Taranto G; Onesti MG; Greco M; Ribuffo D
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1357-1363. PubMed ID: 30827802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. How to Optimize Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.
Graziano FD; Henderson PW; Jacobs J; Salzberg CA; Sbitany H
Aesthet Surg J; 2020 Nov; 40(Suppl 2):S22-S28. PubMed ID: 33202014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Understanding the Evidence and Improving Outcomes with Implant-Based Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.
Campbell CA; Losken A
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Sep; 148(3):437e-450e. PubMed ID: 34432700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Quantifying the Impact of Prepectoral Implant Conversion on Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life.
Seitz AJ; MacKenzie EL; Edalatpour A; Janssen DA; Doubek WG; Afifi AM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2024 May; 153(5):884e-894e. PubMed ID: 37335561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Evaluation of Patient's Quality of Life and Satisfaction with BREAST-Q.
Cogliandro A; Salzillo R; De Bernardis R; Loria FS; Petrucci V; Barone M; Tenna S; Cagli B; Persichetti P
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2023 Aug; 47(4):1291-1299. PubMed ID: 36944866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Examination of Outcome Disparities in Reports of Prepectoral and Subpectoral Direct-to-Implant Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Montorfano L; Hung YC; Chaker S; Saad M; Kalmar CL; Ferri F; Higdon KK; Perdikis G
Ann Plast Surg; 2023 May; 90(5):506-515. PubMed ID: 36975095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prepectoral breast reconstruction with complete anterior implant coverage using a single, large, square-shaped acellular dermal matrix.
Hong HK; Kim YH; Lee JS; Lee J; Park HY; Yang JD
BMC Surg; 2022 Jun; 22(1):234. PubMed ID: 35718764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
