300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37716431)
21. AI-Generated Information for Vascular Patients: Assessing the Standard of Procedure-Specific Information Provided by the ChatGPT AI-Language Model.
Haidar O; Jaques A; McCaughran PW; Metcalfe MJ
Cureus; 2023 Nov; 15(11):e49764. PubMed ID: 38046759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Assessing the Efficacy of Large Language Models in Health Literacy: A Comprehensive Cross-Sectional Study.
Amin KS; Mayes LC; Khosla P; Doshi RH
Yale J Biol Med; 2024 Mar; 97(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 38559461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Harnessing artificial intelligence in bariatric surgery: comparative analysis of ChatGPT-4, Bing, and Bard in generating clinician-level bariatric surgery recommendations.
Lee Y; Shin T; Tessier L; Javidan A; Jung J; Hong D; Strong AT; McKechnie T; Malone S; Jin D; Kroh M; Dang JT;
Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2024 Jul; 20(7):603-608. PubMed ID: 38644078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluating the quality and readability of Internet information sources regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders.
O'Connell Ferster AP; Hu A
Ear Nose Throat J; 2017 Mar; 96(3):128-138. PubMed ID: 28346643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Readability Assessment of Online Uveitis Patient Education Materials.
Ayoub S; Tsui E; Mohammed T; Tseng J
Ocul Immunol Inflamm; 2019; 27(3):399-403. PubMed ID: 29286863
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of information accuracy and clarity: ChatGPT responses to the most frequently asked questions about premature ejaculation.
Şahin MF; Keleş A; Özcan R; Doğan Ç; Topkaç EC; Akgül M; Yazıci CM
Sex Med; 2024 Jun; 12(3):qfae036. PubMed ID: 38832125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Artificial intelligence insights into osteoporosis: assessing ChatGPT's information quality and readability.
Erden Y; Temel MH; Bağcıer F
Arch Osteoporos; 2024 Mar; 19(1):17. PubMed ID: 38499716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of the reliability and readability of ChatGPT-4 responses regarding hypothyroidism during pregnancy.
Onder CE; Koc G; Gokbulut P; Taskaldiran I; Kuskonmaz SM
Sci Rep; 2024 Jan; 14(1):243. PubMed ID: 38167988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Is ChatGPT a trusted source of information for total hip and knee arthroplasty patients?
Wright BM; Bodnar MS; Moore AD; Maseda MC; Kucharik MP; Diaz CC; Schmidt CM; Mir HR
Bone Jt Open; 2024 Feb; 5(2):139-146. PubMed ID: 38354748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The Performance of Chatbots and the AAPOS Website as a Tool for Amblyopia Education.
Doğan L; Özçakmakcı GB; Yılmaz ĬE
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2024 Apr; ():1-7. PubMed ID: 38661309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of Patient Education Materials Generated by Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer Versus Experts: An Innovative Way to Increase Readability of Patient Education Materials.
Hung YC; Chaker SC; Sigel M; Saad M; Slater ED
Ann Plast Surg; 2023 Oct; 91(4):409-412. PubMed ID: 37713147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Bridging the Gap Between Urological Research and Patient Understanding: The Role of Large Language Models in Automated Generation of Layperson's Summaries.
Eppler MB; Ganjavi C; Knudsen JE; Davis RJ; Ayo-Ajibola O; Desai A; Storino Ramacciotti L; Chen A; De Castro Abreu A; Desai MM; Gill IS; Cacciamani GE
Urol Pract; 2023 Sep; 10(5):436-443. PubMed ID: 37410015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Decoding medical jargon: The use of AI language models (ChatGPT-4, BARD, microsoft copilot) in radiology reports.
Tepe M; Emekli E
Patient Educ Couns; 2024 Sep; 126():108307. PubMed ID: 38743965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reliability and readability analysis of ChatGPT-4 and Google Bard as a patient information source for the most commonly applied radionuclide treatments in cancer patients.
Şan H; Bayrakcı Ö; Çağdaş B; Serdengeçti M; Alagöz E
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2024 May; ():500021. PubMed ID: 38821410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of Large Language Models in Answering Immuno-Oncology Questions: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Iannantuono GM; Bracken-Clarke D; Karzai F; Choo-Wosoba H; Gulley JL; Floudas CS
Oncologist; 2024 May; 29(5):407-414. PubMed ID: 38309720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Information Quality and Readability: ChatGPT's Responses to the Most Common Questions About Spinal Cord Injury.
Temel MH; Erden Y; Bağcıer F
World Neurosurg; 2024 Jan; 181():e1138-e1144. PubMed ID: 38000671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of Large Language Models in Answering Immuno-Oncology Questions: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Iannantuono GM; Bracken-Clarke D; Karzai F; Choo-Wosoba H; Gulley JL; Floudas CS
medRxiv; 2023 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 38076813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. ChatGPT-4 Can Help Hand Surgeons Communicate Better With Patients.
Browne R; Gull K; Hurley CM; Sugrue RM; O'Sullivan JB
J Hand Surg Glob Online; 2024 May; 6(3):436-438. PubMed ID: 38817773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessment of Quality and Readability of Information Provided by ChatGPT in Relation to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.
Fahy S; Oehme S; Milinkovic D; Jung T; Bartek B
J Pers Med; 2024 Jan; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 38248805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Assessing the Accuracy of Information on Medication Abortion: A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT and Google Bard AI.
Mediboina A; Badam RK; Chodavarapu S
Cureus; 2024 Jan; 16(1):e51544. PubMed ID: 38318564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
