These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37717344)
1. Piloting a shared decision-making clinician training intervention in maternity care in Australia: A mixed methods study. Clerke T; Margetts J; Donovan H; Shepherd HL; Makris A; Canty A; Ruhotas A; Catling C; Henry A Midwifery; 2023 Nov; 126():103828. PubMed ID: 37717344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How midwives facilitate informed decisions in the third stage of labour - an exploration through portraiture. Kloester J; Brand G; Willey S Midwifery; 2023 Dec; 127():103868. PubMed ID: 37931464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Socially disadvantaged women's views of barriers to feeling safe to engage in decision-making in maternity care. Ebert L; Bellchambers H; Ferguson A; Browne J Women Birth; 2014 Jun; 27(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 24355713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On speaking terms: a Delphi study on shared decision-making in maternity care. Nieuwenhuijze MJ; Korstjens I; de Jonge A; de Vries R; Lagro-Janssen A BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Jul; 14():223. PubMed ID: 25008286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Labouring Together: Women's experiences of "Getting the care that I want and need" in maternity care. Watkins V; Nagle C; Kent B; Street M; Hutchinson AM Midwifery; 2022 Oct; 113():103420. PubMed ID: 35849913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Midwives' experiences of father participation in maternity care at a large metropolitan health service in Australia. Wynter K; Di Manno L; Watkins V; Rasmussen B; Macdonald JA Midwifery; 2021 Oct; 101():103046. PubMed ID: 34098224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How a perineal care bundle impacts midwifery practice in Australian maternity hospitals: A critical, reflexive thematic analysis. Allen J; Small K; Lee N Women Birth; 2022 Feb; 35(1):e1-e9. PubMed ID: 33485817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors influencing the clinical decision-making of midwives: a qualitative study. Daemers DOA; van Limbeek EBM; Wijnen HAA; Nieuwenhuijze MJ; de Vries RG BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Oct; 17(1):345. PubMed ID: 28985725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Giving midwives a voice - Qualitative perspectives of an 'empowering decision-making workshop'. Jefford E; Nolan S; Jomeen J; Maier B J Clin Nurs; 2022 Mar; 31(5-6):592-600. PubMed ID: 34114284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving the quality and content of midwives' discussions with low-risk women about their options for place of birth: Co-production and evaluation of an intervention package. Henshall C; Taylor B; Goodwin L; Farre A; Jones ME; Kenyon S Midwifery; 2018 Apr; 59():118-126. PubMed ID: 29421641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Needs of parents and professionals to improve shared decision-making in interprofessional maternity care practice: A qualitative study. Molenaar J; Korstjens I; Hendrix M; de Vries R; Nieuwenhuijze M Birth; 2018 Sep; 45(3):245-254. PubMed ID: 30051527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Shared decision-making in maternity care: Acknowledging and overcoming epistemic defeaters. Begley K; Daly D; Panda S; Begley C J Eval Clin Pract; 2019 Dec; 25(6):1113-1120. PubMed ID: 31338953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Midwives' experiences of facilitating informed decision-making - a narrative literature review. Kloester J; Willey S; Hall H; Brand G Midwifery; 2022 Jun; 109():103322. PubMed ID: 35358936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of birth plans for shared decision-making around birth choices of pregnant women in maternity care: A scoping review. Shareef N; Scholten N; Nieuwenhuijze M; Stramrood C; de Vries M; van Dillen J Women Birth; 2023 Jul; 36(4):327-333. PubMed ID: 36464597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Mother's Autonomy in Decision Making (MADM) scale: Patient-led development and psychometric testing of a new instrument to evaluate experience of maternity care. Vedam S; Stoll K; Martin K; Rubashkin N; Partridge S; Thordarson D; Jolicoeur G; PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171804. PubMed ID: 28231285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinician perspectives of pregnant women's participation in antiemetic decision-making: A qualitative study. Blake Gornall A; Hutchinson AM; Redley B Nurs Health Sci; 2022 Mar; 24(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 35174947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How is high quality research evidence used in everyday decisions about induction of labour between pregnant women and maternity care professionals? An exploratory study. Farnworth A; Graham RH; Haighton CA; Robson SC Midwifery; 2021 Sep; 100():103030. PubMed ID: 34048941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Co-designing a theory-informed intervention to increase shared decision-making in maternity care. Waddell A; Spassova G; Sampson L; Jungbluth L; Dam J; Bragge P Health Res Policy Syst; 2023 Jan; 21(1):15. PubMed ID: 36721156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Could a decision support tool be the key to supporting choice for women regarding place of birth? Wiggins D; Hundley VA; Bond C; Wilkins C; Walton G Midwifery; 2023 Feb; 117():103564. PubMed ID: 36525895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Women's, midwives' and obstetricians' experiences of a structured process to document refusal of recommended maternity care. Jenkinson B; Kruske S; Stapleton H; Beckmann M; Reynolds M; Kildea S Women Birth; 2016 Dec; 29(6):531-541. PubMed ID: 27289330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]