141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37718330)
1. 3D simulation of interosseous interference in sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular asymmetry.
Udayakumar SIV; Kim D; Choi SY; Kwon TG
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Sep; 45(1):32. PubMed ID: 37718330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of condylar morphology changes and position stability following unilateral and bilateral sagittal split mandibular ramus osteotomy in patients with mandibular prognathism.
Lin H; He Y; Feng Y; Huang F
Head Face Med; 2019 Jul; 15(1):18. PubMed ID: 31296246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comprehensive Analysis of Mandibular Residual Asymmetry after Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Correction of Menton Point Deviation.
Lin H; Zhu P; Lin Q; Huang X; Xu Y; Yang X
PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0161601. PubMed ID: 27571364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional changes of proximal segments in facial asymmetry patients after bilateral vertical ramus osteotomy.
Huh JW; Kim SY; Lee YB; Park JH; Jung HD; Jung YS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Aug; 49(8):1036-1041. PubMed ID: 29776719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interferences between mandibular proximal and distal segments in orthognathic surgery for patients with asymmetric mandibular prognathism depending on different osteotomy techniques.
Yang HJ; Lee WJ; Yi WJ; Hwang SJ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jul; 110(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 20382051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Change in condylar position in posterior bending osteotomy minimizing condylar torque in BSSRO for facial asymmetry.
Yang HJ; Hwang SJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 42(4):325-32. PubMed ID: 23816144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Skeletal stability after sagittal split ramus osteotomy with physiological positioning in patients with skeletal mandibular prognathism and facial asymmetry.
Ohba S; Nakao N; Kawasaki T; Miura KI; Minamizato T; Koga Y; Yoshida N; Asahina I
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Oct; 54(8):920-926. PubMed ID: 27372232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Changes in temporomandibular joint and ramus after sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular prognathism patients with and without asymmetry.
Ueki K; Moroi A; Sotobori M; Ishihara Y; Marukawa K; Yoshizawa K; Kato K; Kawashiri S
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):821-7. PubMed ID: 22507292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Proximal Segment Changes After Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy in Facial Asymmetry Patients.
Kim JW; Son WS; Kim SS; Kim YI
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Aug; 73(8):1592-605. PubMed ID: 25976689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of postoperative stability after BSSRO to correct facial asymmetry depending on the amount of bone contact between the proximal and distal segment.
Yang HJ; Hwang SJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e165-70. PubMed ID: 24011465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Three-dimensional changes in condylar position in skeletal class Ⅲ patients with mandibular deviation after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy].
Huang JQ; Huang Z; Wu J; Wang YJ; Sang T; Liu F; Zheng Y
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Oct; 54(10):649-655. PubMed ID: 31606999
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A cross-sectional study on three-dimensional compensatory characteristics of maxillary teeth in patients with different types of skeletal Class III malocclusion with mandibular asymmetry.
Li J; Liu Y; Ge X; Liu Z; Guan H; Wang L; Ma W
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Sep; 27(9):4973-4985. PubMed ID: 37417986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Maintaining the space between the mandibular ramus segments during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy does not influence the stability.
Vamvanij N; Chinpaisarn C; Denadai R; Seo HJ; Pai BCJ; Lin HH; Lo LJ
J Formos Med Assoc; 2021 Sep; 120(9):1768-1776. PubMed ID: 33775535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation on the condylar displacement following sagittal split ramus osteotomy in asymmetric setback patients: Comparison between conventional approach and surgery-first approach.
Oh MH; Hwang HS; Lee KM; Cho JH
Angle Orthod; 2017 Sep; 87(5):733-738. PubMed ID: 28530843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. BSSRO Improves Mandibular Morphology Mainly through Correction of Body Length and Volume in Patients with Asymmetric Mandibular Prognathism.
Liu Y; Li Y
J Clin Med; 2022 Nov; 11(23):. PubMed ID: 36498704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of the lateral skeletal stability following bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular asymmetry.
Hasegawa S; Sasaki J; Nakao H; Tomimatsu M; Yamamoto S; Watanabe S; Miyabe S; Miyachi H; Goto M
JPRAS Open; 2023 Dec; 38():36-47. PubMed ID: 37675277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Unilateral intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy and sagittal split ramus osteotomy for the treatment of asymmetric mandibles.
Lee JH; Park TJ; Jeon JH
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 41(2):102-8. PubMed ID: 25922823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical effect of asymmetric mandibular prognathism treated with BSSRO and USSRO on temporomandibular joints: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Li H; Zhou N; Huang X; Zhang T; He S; Guo P
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Nov; 58(9):1103-1109. PubMed ID: 32646786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adaptation of soft tissue following bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy in skeletal class III patients with facial asymmetry: A retrospective study.
Do J; Yang HJ
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Jun; ():101941. PubMed ID: 38852620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy on the stress distributions in the temporomandibular joints of the patients with facial asymmetry under symmetric occlusions.
Shu JH; Yao J; Zhang YL; Chong DYR; Liu Z
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jun; 97(25):e11204. PubMed ID: 29924045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
