161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37719098)
1. The nature of embryonic mosaicism across female age spectrum: an analysis of 21,345 preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy cycles.
Armstrong A; Kroener L; Miller J; Nguyen A; Kwan L; Quinn M
F S Rep; 2023 Sep; 4(3):256-261. PubMed ID: 37719098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. National mosaic embryo transfer practices: a survey.
Kim TG; Neblett MF; Shandley LM; Omurtag K; Hipp HS; Kawwass JF
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Dec; 219(6):602.e1-602.e7. PubMed ID: 30278174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of copy number loads to designate mosaicism in blastocyst stage PGT-A cycles: fewer is better.
Girardi L; Figliuzzi M; Poli M; Serdarogullari M; Patassini C; Caroselli S; Pergher I; Cogo F; Coban O; Boynukalin FK; Bahceci M; Navarro R; Rubio C; Findikli N; Simón C; Capalbo A
Hum Reprod; 2023 May; 38(5):982-991. PubMed ID: 36928183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimizing mosaicism: assessing the impact of fertilization method on rate of mosaicism after next-generation sequencing (NGS) preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A).
Palmerola KL; Vitez SF; Amrane S; Fischer CP; Forman EJ
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2019 Jan; 36(1):153-157. PubMed ID: 30362056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Extended in vitro culture of human embryos demonstrates the complex nature of diagnosing chromosomal mosaicism from a single trophectoderm biopsy.
Popovic M; Dhaenens L; Taelman J; Dheedene A; Bialecka M; De Sutter P; Chuva de Sousa Lopes SM; Menten B; Heindryckx B
Hum Reprod; 2019 Apr; 34(4):758-769. PubMed ID: 30838420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for putative mosaic blastocysts: a pilot study.
Li X; Hao Y; Chen D; Ji D; Zhu W; Zhu X; Wei Z; Cao Y; Zhang Z; Zhou P
Hum Reprod; 2021 Jun; 36(7):2020-2034. PubMed ID: 33974705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Neonatal and clinical outcomes after transfer of a mosaic embryo identified by preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies.
Yakovlev P; Vyatkina S; Polyakov A; Pavlova M; Volkomorov V; Yakovlev M; Filimonov S; Kazaryn L; Aizikovich A; Kornilov N
Reprod Biomed Online; 2022 Jul; 45(1):88-100. PubMed ID: 35469763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The true incidence of chromosomal mosaicism after preimplantation genetic testing is much lower than that indicated by trophectoderm biopsy.
Wu L; Jin L; Chen W; Liu JM; Hu J; Yu Q; Ren XL; Huang B; He H
Hum Reprod; 2021 May; 36(6):1691-1701. PubMed ID: 33860322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The concordance rates of an initial trophectoderm biopsy with the rest of the embryo using PGTseq, a targeted next-generation sequencing platform for preimplantation genetic testing-aneuploidy.
Kim J; Tao X; Cheng M; Steward A; Guo V; Zhan Y; Scott RT; Jalas C
Fertil Steril; 2022 Feb; 117(2):315-323. PubMed ID: 34980428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Healthy live births from transfer of low-mosaicism embryos after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.
Lee CI; Cheng EH; Lee MS; Lin PY; Chen YC; Chen CH; Huang LS; Huang CC; Lee TH
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2020 Sep; 37(9):2305-2313. PubMed ID: 32623662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using outcome data from one thousand mosaic embryo transfers to formulate an embryo ranking system for clinical use.
Viotti M; Victor AR; Barnes FL; Zouves CG; Besser AG; Grifo JA; Cheng EH; Lee MS; Horcajadas JA; Corti L; Fiorentino F; Spinella F; Minasi MG; Greco E; Munné S
Fertil Steril; 2021 May; 115(5):1212-1224. PubMed ID: 33685629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The cytogenetic constitution of human blastocysts: insights from comprehensive chromosome screening strategies.
Fragouli E; Munne S; Wells D
Hum Reprod Update; 2019 Jan; 25(1):15-33. PubMed ID: 30395265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. One hundred mosaic embryos transferred prospectively in a single clinic: exploring when and why they result in healthy pregnancies.
Victor AR; Tyndall JC; Brake AJ; Lepkowsky LT; Murphy AE; Griffin DK; McCoy RC; Barnes FL; Zouves CG; Viotti M
Fertil Steril; 2019 Feb; 111(2):280-293. PubMed ID: 30691630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The morphokinetic signature of mosaic embryos: evidence in support of their own genetic identity.
Martín Á; Rodrigo L; Beltrán D; Meseguer M; Rubio C; Mercader A; de Los Santos MJ
Fertil Steril; 2021 Jul; 116(1):165-173. PubMed ID: 33766460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is there a correlation between paternal age and aneuploidy rate? An analysis of 3,118 embryos derived from young egg donors.
Dviri M; Madjunkova S; Koziarz A; Antes R; Abramov R; Mashiach J; Moskovtsev S; Kuznyetsova I; Librach C
Fertil Steril; 2020 Aug; 114(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 32654815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. FISH reanalysis of inner cell mass and trophectoderm samples of previously array-CGH screened blastocysts shows high accuracy of diagnosis and no major diagnostic impact of mosaicism at the blastocyst stage.
Capalbo A; Wright G; Elliott T; Ubaldi FM; Rienzi L; Nagy ZP
Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2298-307. PubMed ID: 23739221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. To mask or not to mask mosaicism? The impact of reporting embryo mosaicism on reproductive potential.
Armstrong A; Miller J; Quinn M; Nguyen AV; Kwan L; Kroener L
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2022 Sep; 39(9):2035-2042. PubMed ID: 35857256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Should every embryo undergo preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy? A review of the modern approach to in vitro fertilization.
Maxwell SM; Grifo JA
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Nov; 53():38-47. PubMed ID: 30146380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical outcomes after the transfer of blastocysts characterized as mosaic by high resolution Next Generation Sequencing- further insights.
Munné S; Spinella F; Grifo J; Zhang J; Beltran MP; Fragouli E; Fiorentino F
Eur J Med Genet; 2020 Feb; 63(2):103741. PubMed ID: 31445143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The human embryonic genome is karyotypically complex, with chromosomally abnormal cells preferentially located away from the developing fetus.
Griffin DK; Brezina PR; Tobler K; Zhao Y; Silvestri G; Mccoy RC; Anchan R; Benner A; Cutting GR; Kearns WG
Hum Reprod; 2023 Jan; 38(1):180-188. PubMed ID: 36350568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
