104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37720244)
1. Forward variable selection for random forest models.
Velthoen J; Cai JJ; Jongbloed G
J Appl Stat; 2023; 50(13):2836-2856. PubMed ID: 37720244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative study of forest methods for time-to-event data: variable selection and predictive performance.
Liu Y; Zhou S; Wei H; An S
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Sep; 21(1):193. PubMed ID: 34563138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Variable selection for partially linear models via Bayesian subset modeling with diffusing prior.
Wang J; Cai X; Li R
J Multivar Anal; 2021 May; 183():. PubMed ID: 33867594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Randomized boosting with multivariable base-learners for high-dimensional variable selection and prediction.
Staerk C; Mayr A
BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Sep; 22(1):441. PubMed ID: 34530737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Forward regression for Cox models with high-dimensional covariates.
Hong HG; Zheng Q; Li Y
J Multivar Anal; 2019 Sep; 173():268-290. PubMed ID: 31007300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Part 1. Statistical Learning Methods for the Effects of Multiple Air Pollution Constituents.
Coull BA; Bobb JF; Wellenius GA; Kioumourtzoglou MA; Mittleman MA; Koutrakis P; Godleski JJ
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2015 Jun; (183 Pt 1-2):5-50. PubMed ID: 26333238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression.
Bursac Z; Gauss CH; Williams DK; Hosmer DW
Source Code Biol Med; 2008 Dec; 3():17. PubMed ID: 19087314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating the Growing Stem Volume of Coniferous Plantations Based on Random Forest Using an Optimized Variable Selection Method.
Jiang F; Kutia M; Sarkissian AJ; Lin H; Long J; Sun H; Wang G
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Dec; 20(24):. PubMed ID: 33348807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Power, selection bias and predictive performance of the Population Pharmacokinetic Covariate Model.
Ribbing J; Jonsson EN
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2004 Apr; 31(2):109-34. PubMed ID: 15379381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Unbiased split variable selection for random survival forests using maximally selected rank statistics.
Wright MN; Dankowski T; Ziegler A
Stat Med; 2017 Apr; 36(8):1272-1284. PubMed ID: 28088842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Random forests for feature selection in QSPR Models - an application for predicting standard enthalpy of formation of hydrocarbons.
Teixeira AL; Leal JP; Falcao AO
J Cheminform; 2013 Feb; 5(1):9. PubMed ID: 23399299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A simulation based method for assessing the statistical significance of logistic regression models after common variable selection procedures.
Grogan TR; Elashoff DA
Commun Stat Simul Comput; 2017; 46(9):7180-7193. PubMed ID: 29225408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Forward Stagewise Shrinkage and Addition for High Dimensional Censored Regression.
Guo Z; Lu W; Li L
Stat Biosci; 2015 Oct; 7(2):225-244. PubMed ID: 26904152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Recursive Random Forests Enable Better Predictive Performance and Model Interpretation than Variable Selection by LASSO.
Zhu XW; Xin YJ; Ge HL
J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Apr; 55(4):736-46. PubMed ID: 25746224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Block Forests: random forests for blocks of clinical and omics covariate data.
Hornung R; Wright MN
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Jun; 20(1):358. PubMed ID: 31248362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficient test-based variable selection for high-dimensional linear models.
Gong S; Zhang K; Liu Y
J Multivar Anal; 2018 Jul; 166():17-31. PubMed ID: 30613114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. r2VIM: A new variable selection method for random forests in genome-wide association studies.
Szymczak S; Holzinger E; Dasgupta A; Malley JD; Molloy AM; Mills JL; Brody LC; Stambolian D; Bailey-Wilson JE
BioData Min; 2016; 9():7. PubMed ID: 26839594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Selection Consistency of Lasso-Based Procedures for Misspecified High-Dimensional Binary Model and Random Regressors.
Kubkowski M; Mielniczuk J
Entropy (Basel); 2020 Jan; 22(2):. PubMed ID: 33285928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of variable selection methods for random forests and omics data sets.
Degenhardt F; Seifert S; Szymczak S
Brief Bioinform; 2019 Mar; 20(2):492-503. PubMed ID: 29045534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
