These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37720244)

  • 41. Multivariate modeling of complications with data driven variable selection: guarding against overfitting and effects of data set size.
    van der Schaaf A; Xu CJ; van Luijk P; Van't Veld AA; Langendijk JA; Schilstra C
    Radiother Oncol; 2012 Oct; 105(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 22264894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A random forest approach for competing risks based on pseudo-values.
    Mogensen UB; Gerds TA
    Stat Med; 2013 Aug; 32(18):3102-14. PubMed ID: 23508720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A Random Forest Approach for Bounded Outcome Variables.
    Weinhold L; Schmid M; Mitchell R; Maloney KO; Wright MN; Berger M
    J Comput Graph Stat; 2020; 29(3):639-658. PubMed ID: 34121830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Variable selection for ultra-high dimensional quantile regression with missing data and measurement error.
    Bai Y; Tian M; Tang ML; Lee WY
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Jan; 30(1):129-150. PubMed ID: 32746735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. An empirical approach to model selection through validation for censored survival data.
    Choi I; Wells BJ; Yu C; Kattan MW
    J Biomed Inform; 2011 Aug; 44(4):595-606. PubMed ID: 21335102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Ensemble methods for survival function estimation with time-varying covariates.
    Yao W; Frydman H; Larocque D; Simonoff JS
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Nov; 31(11):2217-2236. PubMed ID: 35895510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. An introspective comparison of random forest-based classifiers for the analysis of cluster-correlated data by way of RF++.
    Karpievitch YV; Hill EG; Leclerc AP; Dabney AR; Almeida JS
    PLoS One; 2009 Sep; 4(9):e7087. PubMed ID: 19763254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Can Predictive Modeling Tools Identify Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Opioid Use After ACL Reconstruction?
    Anderson AB; Grazal CF; Balazs GC; Potter BK; Dickens JF; Forsberg JA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jul; 478(7):0-1618. PubMed ID: 32282466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Variable selection and importance in presence of high collinearity: an application to the prediction of lean body mass from multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance.
    Cammarota C; Pinto A
    J Appl Stat; 2021; 48(9):1644-1658. PubMed ID: 35706573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evaluating Random Forests for Survival Analysis using Prediction Error Curves.
    Mogensen UB; Ishwaran H; Gerds TA
    J Stat Softw; 2012 Sep; 50(11):1-23. PubMed ID: 25317082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Use and misuse of random forest variable importance metrics in medicine: demonstrations through incident stroke prediction.
    Wallace ML; Mentch L; Wheeler BJ; Tapia AL; Richards M; Zhou S; Yi L; Redline S; Buysse DJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Jun; 23(1):144. PubMed ID: 37337173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Conditional canonical correlation estimation based on covariates with random forests.
    Alakuş C; Larocque D; Jacquemont S; Barlaam F; Martin CO; Agbogba K; Lippé S; Labbe A
    Bioinformatics; 2021 Sep; 37(17):2714-2721. PubMed ID: 33693547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Coupled variable selection for regression modeling of complex treatment patterns in a clinical cancer registry.
    Schmidtmann I; Elsäßer A; Weinmann A; Binder H
    Stat Med; 2014 Dec; 33(30):5358-70. PubMed ID: 25345575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Application of a single-objective, hybrid genetic algorithm approach to pharmacokinetic model building.
    Sherer EA; Sale ME; Pollock BG; Belani CP; Egorin MJ; Ivy PS; Lieberman JA; Manuck SB; Marder SR; Muldoon MF; Scher HI; Solit DB; Bies RR
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2012 Aug; 39(4):393-414. PubMed ID: 22767341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Variable selection for censored data using Modified Correlation Adjusted coRrelation (MCAR) scores.
    Mimi A; Khan MHR
    Stat Med; 2021 Oct; 40(23):5046-5064. PubMed ID: 34155660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Machine learning algorithms for outcome prediction in (chemo)radiotherapy: An empirical comparison of classifiers.
    Deist TM; Dankers FJWM; Valdes G; Wijsman R; Hsu IC; Oberije C; Lustberg T; van Soest J; Hoebers F; Jochems A; El Naqa I; Wee L; Morin O; Raleigh DR; Bots W; Kaanders JH; Belderbos J; Kwint M; Solberg T; Monshouwer R; Bussink J; Dekker A; Lambin P
    Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3449-3459. PubMed ID: 29763967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Random KNN feature selection - a fast and stable alternative to Random Forests.
    Li S; Harner EJ; Adjeroh DA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Nov; 12():450. PubMed ID: 22093447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Estimating the aboveground biomass of coniferous forest in Northeast China using spectral variables, land surface temperature and soil moisture.
    Jiang F; Kutia M; Ma K; Chen S; Long J; Sun H
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Sep; 785():147335. PubMed ID: 33933773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Variable selection for random effects two-part models.
    Han D; Liu L; Su X; Johnson B; Sun L
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Sep; 28(9):2697-2709. PubMed ID: 30001684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A comparative study of variable selection methods in the context of developing psychiatric screening instruments.
    Lu F; Petkova E
    Stat Med; 2014 Feb; 33(3):401-21. PubMed ID: 23934941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.