These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37722)

  • 1. Irritant actions of unphysiological pH values. A controlled procedure to test for topical irritancy.
    Bucher K; Bucher KE; Walz D
    Agents Actions; 1979 Apr; 9(1):124-32. PubMed ID: 37722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The quantitative assessment of topical irritancy and its application to unphysiological pH-values.
    Walz D; Bucher KE
    Agents Actions; 1982 Oct; 12(4):552-65. PubMed ID: 7180740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Irritant action due to physico-chemical parameters of test solutions.
    Walz D
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1985 Feb; 23(2):299-302. PubMed ID: 4040079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of a tiered in vitro testing strategy for assessing the ocular and dermal irritation/corrosion potential of pharmaceutical compounds for worker safety.
    Graham JC; Wilt N; Costin GE; Villano C; Bader J; Krawiec L; Sly E; Gould J
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2018 Dec; 37(4):380-390. PubMed ID: 30035615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative assessment of irritation in the mouse skin test.
    Walz D
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1985 Feb; 23(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 4040066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The ECVAM international validation study on in vitro tests for acute skin irritation: selection of test chemicals.
    Eskes C; Cole T; Hoffmann S; Worth A; Cockshott A; Gerner I; Zuang V
    Altern Lab Anim; 2007 Dec; 35(6):603-19. PubMed ID: 18186668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Irritancy ranking of 31 cleansers in the Indian market in a 24-h patch test.
    Lakshmi C; Srinivas CR; Anand CV; Mathew AC
    Int J Cosmet Sci; 2008 Aug; 30(4):277-83. PubMed ID: 18713074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new alternative method for testing skin irritation using a human skin model: a pilot study.
    Miles A; Berthet A; Hopf NB; Gilliet M; Raffoul W; Vernez D; Spring P
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2014 Mar; 28(2):240-7. PubMed ID: 24211334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The ECVAM international validation study on in vitro tests for acute skin irritation: report on the validity of the EPISKIN and EpiDerm assays and on the Skin Integrity Function Test.
    Spielmann H; Hoffmann S; Liebsch M; Botham P; Fentem JH; Eskes C; Roguet R; Cotovio J; Cole T; Worth A; Heylings J; Jones P; Robles C; Kandárová H; Gamer A; Remmele M; Curren R; Raabe H; Cockshott A; Gerner I; Zuang V
    Altern Lab Anim; 2007 Dec; 35(6):559-601. PubMed ID: 18186667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A modified HET-CAM assay approach to the assessment of anti-irritant properties of plant extracts.
    Wilson TD; Steck WF
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2000 Oct; 38(10):867-72. PubMed ID: 11039320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cutaneous irritancy of water.
    Wang TS; Tsai TF
    Rev Environ Health; 2014; 29(3):217-20. PubMed ID: 25274940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of Skin Irritation of Acids Commonly Used in Cleaners in 3D-Reconstructed Human Epidermis Model, KeraSkin
    Hwang JH; Lee S; Lee HG; Choi D; Lim KM
    Toxics; 2022 Sep; 10(10):. PubMed ID: 36287839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of a flow cytometry assay for the identification and differentiation of chemicals with the potential to elicit irritation, IgE-mediated, or T cell-mediated hypersensitivity responses.
    Manetz TS; Meade BJ
    Toxicol Sci; 1999 Apr; 48(2):206-17. PubMed ID: 10353312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of pH on the production of irritation in a chamber irritation test.
    Murahata RI; Toton-Quinn R; Finkey MB
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1988 Jan; 18(1 Pt 1):62-6. PubMed ID: 3346410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Approximal plaque pH following topical applications of standard buffers in vivo.
    Baelum V; Fejerskov O; Küseler A
    Caries Res; 1994; 28(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 8156561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurement of skin-fold thickness in the guinea pig. Assessment of edema-inducing capacity of cutting fluids, acids, alkalis, formalin and dimethyl sulfoxide.
    Wahlberg JE
    Contact Dermatitis; 1993 Mar; 28(3):141-5. PubMed ID: 8462289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of in vitro and in vivo human skin responses to consumer products and ingredients with a range of irritancy potential.
    Perkins MA; Osborne R; Rana FR; Ghassemi A; Robinson MK
    Toxicol Sci; 1999 Apr; 48(2):218-29. PubMed ID: 10353313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of skin delivery of ferulic acid and its derivatives: evaluation of their efficacy and safety.
    Zhang LW; Al-Suwayeh SA; Hsieh PW; Fang JY
    Int J Pharm; 2010 Oct; 399(1-2):44-51. PubMed ID: 20692328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Alkane-induced edema formation and cutaneous barrier dysfunction.
    Moloney SJ; Teal JJ
    Arch Dermatol Res; 1988; 280(6):375-9. PubMed ID: 3190267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of pH measurements to predict the potential of chemicals to cause acute dermal and ocular toxicity.
    Worth AP; Cronin MT
    Toxicology; 2001 Dec; 169(2):119-31. PubMed ID: 11718953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.