120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37722382)
1. Tensor-conductance model for reducing the computational artifact in target tissue for low-frequency dosimetry.
Diao Y; Liu L; Deng N; Lyu S; Hirata A
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Oct; 68(20):. PubMed ID: 37722382
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. An effective edge conductivity for reducing staircasing error in induced electric field computation for low-frequency magnetic field dosimetry.
Diao Y; Zhang L; Shi D; Hirata A
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Oct; 67(21):. PubMed ID: 36137544
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Reducing the staircasing error in computational dosimetry of low-frequency electromagnetic fields.
Laakso I; Hirata A
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Feb; 57(4):N25-34. PubMed ID: 22290579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computational errors of the induced electric field in voxelized and tetrahedral anatomical head models exposed to spatially uniform and localized magnetic fields.
Soldati M; Laakso I
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Jan; 65(1):015001. PubMed ID: 31791030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An electric field induced in the retina and brain at threshold magnetic flux density causing magnetophosphenes.
Hirata A; Takano Y; Fujiwara O; Dovan T; Kavet R
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jul; 56(13):4091-101. PubMed ID: 21693787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of human brain exposure to low-frequency magnetic fields: a numerical assessment of spatially averaged electric fields and exposure limits.
Chen XL; Benkler S; Chavannes N; De Santis V; Bakker J; van Rhoon G; Mosig J; Kuster N
Bioelectromagnetics; 2013 Jul; 34(5):375-84. PubMed ID: 23404214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The influence of tissue conductivity on the calculation of electric field in the transcranial magnetic stimulation head model].
Niu R; Zhang C; Wu C; Lin H; Zhang G; Huo X
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Jun; 40(3):401-408. PubMed ID: 37380377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computational dosimetry for grounded and ungrounded human models due to contact current.
Chan KH; Hattori J; Laakso I; Hirata A; Taki M
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Aug; 58(15):5153-72. PubMed ID: 23835790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electric field-induced effects on neuronal cell biology accompanying dielectrophoretic trapping.
Heida T
Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol; 2003; 173():III-IX, 1-77. PubMed ID: 12901336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fast computational E-field dosimetry for transcranial magnetic stimulation using adaptive cross approximation and auxiliary dipole method (ACA-ADM).
Wang D; Hasan NI; Dannhauer M; Yucel AC; Gomez LJ
Neuroimage; 2023 Feb; 267():119850. PubMed ID: 36603745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The electric field induced in the brain by magnetic stimulation: a 3-D finite-element analysis of the effect of tissue heterogeneity and anisotropy.
Miranda PC; Hallett M; Basser PJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Sep; 50(9):1074-85. PubMed ID: 12943275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Magneto- and electrophosphene thresholds in the retina: a dosimetry modeling study.
Nissi J; Laakso I
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Jan; 67(1):. PubMed ID: 34965521
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of Anatomical Model and Skin Conductivity on the Electric Field Induced in the Head by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.
Colella M; Paffi A; Fontana S; Rossano F; De Santis V; Apollonio F; Liberti M
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():2917-2920. PubMed ID: 31946501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quasi-static approximation error of electric field analysis for transcranial current stimulation.
Gaugain G; Quéguiner L; Bikson M; Sauleau R; Zhadobov M; Modolo J; Nikolayev D
J Neural Eng; 2023 Jan; 20(1):. PubMed ID: 36621858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Electrical exposure analysis of galvanic-coupled intra-body communication based on the empirical arm models.
Gao YM; Zhang HF; Lin S; Jiang RX; Chen ZY; Lučev Vasić Ž; Vai MI; Du M; Cifrek M; Pun SH
Biomed Eng Online; 2018 Jun; 17(1):71. PubMed ID: 29866126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Physiological observations validate finite element models for estimating subject-specific electric field distributions induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex.
Opitz A; Legon W; Rowlands A; Bickel WK; Paulus W; Tyler WJ
Neuroimage; 2013 Nov; 81():253-264. PubMed ID: 23644000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inter-individual variations in electric fields induced in the brain by exposure to uniform magnetic fields at 50 Hz.
Soldati M; Murakami T; Laakso I
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Oct; 65(21):215006. PubMed ID: 32615544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of local anatomy on the electric field induced by TMS: evaluation at 14 different target sites.
Janssen AM; Oostendorp TF; Stegeman DF
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2014 Oct; 52(10):873-83. PubMed ID: 25163822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Systematic numerical assessment of occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields of transcranial magnetic stimulation.
D'Agostino S; Colella M; Liberti M; Falsaperla R; Apollonio F
Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):3416-3431. PubMed ID: 35196394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of white matter conductivity anisotropy on electric field strength induced by electroconvulsive therapy.
Lee WH; Deng ZD; Laine AF; Lisanby SH; Peterchev AV
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():5473-6. PubMed ID: 22255576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
