These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37722829)

  • 21. Collision-avoidance lane change control method for enhancing safety for connected vehicle platoon in mixed traffic environment.
    Ma Y; Liu Q; Fu J; Liufu K; Li Q
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 May; 184():106999. PubMed ID: 36780868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. How Does C-V2X Help Autonomous Driving to Avoid Accidents?
    Miao L; Chen SF; Hsu YL; Hua KL
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jan; 22(2):. PubMed ID: 35062647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of lead time of verbal collision warning messages on driving behavior in connected vehicle settings.
    Wan J; Wu C; Zhang Y
    J Safety Res; 2016 Sep; 58():89-98. PubMed ID: 27620938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A trial of retrofitted advisory collision avoidance technology in government fleet vehicles.
    Thompson JP; Mackenzie JRR; Dutschke JK; Baldock MRJ; Raftery SJ; Wall J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jun; 115():34-40. PubMed ID: 29544135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Velocity control in car-following behavior with autonomous vehicles using reinforcement learning.
    Wang Z; Huang H; Tang J; Meng X; Hu L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106729. PubMed ID: 35700685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Advancing investigation of automated vehicle crashes using text analytics of crash narratives and Bayesian analysis.
    Lee S; Arvin R; Khattak AJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Mar; 181():106932. PubMed ID: 36580765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of collision warning characteristics on driving behaviors and safety in connected vehicle environments.
    Zhao W; Gong S; Zhao D; Liu F; Sze NN; Huang H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Jun; 186():107053. PubMed ID: 37030178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Scenario establishment and characteristic analysis of intersection collision accidents for advanced driver assistance systems.
    Han I
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(6):354-358. PubMed ID: 32401549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Analysis of pre-crash scenarios and contributing factors for autonomous vehicle crashes at intersections.
    Liu Q; Wang X; Liu S; Yu C; Glaser Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Feb; 195():107383. PubMed ID: 37984113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Crash comparison of autonomous and conventional vehicles using pre-crash scenario typology.
    Liu Q; Wang X; Wu X; Glaser Y; He L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106281. PubMed ID: 34273622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Application of Machine Learning in Ethical Design of Autonomous Driving Crash Algorithms.
    Xiao Y
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():2938011. PubMed ID: 36248938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Experiences of model year 2011 Dodge and Jeep owners with collision avoidance and related technologies.
    Cicchino JB; McCartt AT
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16():298-303. PubMed ID: 24983299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Existence of connected and autonomous vehicles in mixed traffic: Impacts on safety and environment.
    Wei S; Shao M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2024; 25(3):390-399. PubMed ID: 38165395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessment of the safety benefits of vehicles' advanced driver assistance, connectivity and low level automation systems.
    Yue L; Abdel-Aty M; Wu Y; Wang L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():55-64. PubMed ID: 29654988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. How Do Autonomous Vehicles Decide?
    Malik S; Khan MA; El-Sayed H; Khan J; Ullah O
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Dec; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 36616915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An omni-directional model of injury risk in planar crashes with application for autonomous vehicles.
    McMurry TL; Cormier JM; Daniel T; Scanlon JM; Crandall JR
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(sup1):S122-S127. PubMed ID: 34402345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Exploring Factors Influencing Injury Severity of Vehicle At-fault Accidents: A Comparative Analysis of Passenger and Freight Vehicles.
    Wang J; Lu H; Sun Z; Wang T
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Feb; 17(4):. PubMed ID: 32059345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reconstruction of Vehicle-pedestrian Collision Road Traffic Accidents Based on PC-Crash Software.
    Duan TL; He YW; Li Z; Yang F; Li L; Qu YQ
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 35(4):440-443. PubMed ID: 31532154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Research Progress of Traffic Accident Reconstruction Technology Based on PC-Crash Software].
    He YW; Zeng XF; Yan W; Li Y; Song TZ; Huang J; Duan TL; Li L; Li Z
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Jun; 34(3):276-279. PubMed ID: 30051667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Vehicle crash simulations for safety: Introduction of connected and automated vehicles on the roadways.
    Ren R; Li H; Han T; Tian C; Zhang C; Zhang J; Proctor RW; Chen Y; Feng Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Jun; 186():107021. PubMed ID: 36965209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.