BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37722853)

  • 1. Mortality Risk Scoring System in Patients after Bleeding from Cancers in the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract.
    Kim HM; Kang D; Park JY; Cho YK; Choi MG; Park JM
    Gut Liver; 2024 Mar; 18(2):222-230. PubMed ID: 37722853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Kim MS; Choi J; Shin WC
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):136. PubMed ID: 31349816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score and modified Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score in predicting outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: An accuracy and calibration study.
    Akhila Arya PV; Thulaseedharan NK; Raj R; Unnikrishnan DC; Jacob A
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2023 Aug; 42(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 37382854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study.
    Stanley AJ; Laine L; Dalton HR; Ngu JH; Schultz M; Abazi R; Zakko L; Thornton S; Wilkinson K; Khor CJ; Murray IA; Laursen SB;
    BMJ; 2017 Jan; 356():i6432. PubMed ID: 28053181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of a new risk score system for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Kim MS; Moon HS; Kwon IS; Park JH; Kim JS; Kang SH; Sung JK; Lee ES; Kim SH; Lee BS; Jeong HY
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):193. PubMed ID: 32552662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of three scoring systems for risk stratification in elderly patients wıth acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Kalkan Ç; Soykan I; Karakaya F; Tüzün A; Gençtürk ZB
    Geriatr Gerontol Int; 2017 Apr; 17(4):575-583. PubMed ID: 27075860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
    Yaka E; Yılmaz S; Doğan NÖ; Pekdemir M
    Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jan; 22(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 25556538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of three risk scores to predict outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding; modifying Glasgow-Blatchford with albumin.
    Shafaghi A; Gharibpoor F; Mahdipour Z; Samadani AA
    Rom J Intern Med; 2019 Dec; 57(4):322-333. PubMed ID: 31268861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of AIMS65 Score and Other Scoring Systems for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Koreans with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Park SM; Yeum SC; Kim BW; Kim JS; Kim JH; Sim EH; Ji JS; Choi H
    Gut Liver; 2016 Jul; 10(4):526-31. PubMed ID: 27377742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical outcomes of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding according to the risk indicated by Glasgow-Blatchford risk score-computed tomography score in the emergency room.
    Lee HA; Jung HK; Kim TO; Byeon JR; Jeong ES; Cho HJ; Tae CH; Moon CM; Kim SE; Shim KN; Jung SA
    Korean J Intern Med; 2022 Nov; 37(6):1176-1185. PubMed ID: 36375488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems.
    Robertson M; Majumdar A; Boyapati R; Chung W; Worland T; Terbah R; Wei J; Lontos S; Angus P; Vaughan R
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun; 83(6):1151-60. PubMed ID: 26515955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk analysis of 30-day rebleeding in acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Wang X; Yang M; Xu J; Kuai Y; Sun B
    Arab J Gastroenterol; 2023 May; 24(2):136-141. PubMed ID: 37263819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. AIMS65 predicts prognosis of patients with duodenal ulcer bleeding; a comparison with other risk-scoring systems.
    Hirai R; Shimodate Y; Minami M; Ishikawa S; Kanadani T; Takezawa R; Doi A; Nishimura N; Mouri H; Matsueda K; Yamamoto H; Mizuno M
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Dec; 33(12):1480-1484. PubMed ID: 33252414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring approaches in predicting the risk of in-hospital death among emergency hospitalized patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective observational study in Nanjing, China.
    Gu L; Xu F; Yuan J
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 Jun; 18(1):98. PubMed ID: 29954332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scoring systems used to predict mortality in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the ED.
    Tang Y; Shen J; Zhang F; Zhou X; Tang Z; You T
    Am J Emerg Med; 2018 Jan; 36(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 28673695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk stratification in acute variceal bleeding: Comparison of the AIMS65 score to established upper gastrointestinal bleeding and liver disease severity risk stratification scoring systems in predicting mortality and rebleeding.
    Robertson M; Ng J; Abu Shawish W; Swaine A; Skardoon G; Huynh A; Deshpande S; Low ZY; Sievert W; Angus P
    Dig Endosc; 2020 Jul; 32(5):761-768. PubMed ID: 31863515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison between Glascow-Blatchford, Rockall and AIMS65 scores in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a hospital in Lima, Peru].
    Espinoza-Ríos J; Aguilar Sánchez V; Bravo Paredes EA; Pinto Valdivia J; Huerta-Mercado Tenorio J
    Rev Gastroenterol Peru; 2016; 36(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 27409091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The prognostic significance of the risk scores at upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Uysal Y; Babus SB; Kose A; Ates F; Biricik S; Erdogan S; Cevik I; Toker I; Ayrik C
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Aug; 22(8):1099-1108. PubMed ID: 31417053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prognostic value of risk scoring systems for cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding.
    Tantai XX; Liu N; Yang LB; Wei ZC; Xiao CL; Song YH; Wang JH
    World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Dec; 25(45):6668-6680. PubMed ID: 31832005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Risk scoring systems to predict need for clinical intervention for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding.
    Chen IC; Hung MS; Chiu TF; Chen JC; Hsiao CT
    Am J Emerg Med; 2007 Sep; 25(7):774-9. PubMed ID: 17870480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.