137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37723644)
1. Measuring the rarity of core-delta distances in fingerprint patterns in the Dutch population.
de Jongh A; Lubach AR; Lie Kwie SL; Loadsman-Wammes FDLV; Alberink I
J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jan; 69(1):94-116. PubMed ID: 37723644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measuring the Rarity of Fingerprint Patterns in the Dutch Population Using an Extended Classification Set.
de Jongh A; Lubach AR; Lie Kwie SL; Alberink I
J Forensic Sci; 2019 Jan; 64(1):108-119. PubMed ID: 29889979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing the frequency of general fingerprint patterns by fingerprint examiners and novices.
Mattijssen EJAT; Witteman CLM; Berger CEH; Stoel RD
Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Aug; 313():110347. PubMed ID: 32512413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Statistics of fingerprint minutiae frequency and distribution based on automatic minutiae detection method.
Gao M; Tang Y; Liu H; Ma R
Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Mar; 344():111572. PubMed ID: 36739852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Study of the fingerprints of a Spanish sample for the determination of the hand and finger.
Rivaldería N; Moreno-Piedra A; Álvarez A; Gutiérrez-Redomero E
Sci Justice; 2024 Mar; 64(2):216-231. PubMed ID: 38431379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantifying the weight of fingerprint evidence through the spatial relationship, directions and types of minutiae observed on fingermarks.
Neumann C; Champod C; Yoo M; Genessay T; Langenburg G
Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Mar; 248():154-71. PubMed ID: 25637956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measuring what latent fingerprint examiners consider sufficient information for individualization determinations.
Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e110179. PubMed ID: 25372036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Research on the local regional similarity of automatic fingerprint identification system fingerprints based on close non-matches in a ten million people database-Taking the central region of whorl as an example.
Li S; Li K; Yang J; Liu Y; Han W; Luo Y
J Forensic Sci; 2023 Mar; 68(2):488-499. PubMed ID: 36650636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance evaluation of automated fingerprint identification systems for specific conditions observed in casework using simulated fingermarks.
de Jongh A; Rodriguez CM
J Forensic Sci; 2012 Jul; 57(4):1075-81. PubMed ID: 22458701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computation of likelihood ratios in fingerprint identification for configurations of three minutiae.
Neumann C; Champod C; Puch-Solis R; Egli N; Anthonioz A; Meuwly D; Bromage-Griffiths A
J Forensic Sci; 2006 Nov; 51(6):1255-66. PubMed ID: 17199611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fingermark evidence evaluation based on automated fingerprint identification system matching scores: the effect of different types of conditioning on likelihood ratios.
Alberink I; de Jongh A; Rodriguez C
J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jan; 59(1):70-81. PubMed ID: 24180303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative assessment of evidential weight for a fingerprint comparison. Part II: a generalisation to take account of the general pattern.
Neumann C; Evett IW; Skerrett JE; Mateos-Garcia I
Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jan; 214(1-3):195-9. PubMed ID: 21885220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Supporting fingerprint identification assessments using a skin stretch model - A preliminary study.
Lee R; Comber B; Abraham J; Wagner M; Lennard C; Spindler X; Roux C
Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Mar; 272():41-49. PubMed ID: 28110118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fingerprint matching using the onion peeling approach and turning function.
Padkan N; Bigham BS; Faraji MR
Gene Expr Patterns; 2023 Mar; 47():119299. PubMed ID: 36513184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Unusual fingerprint patterns in humans: implications for forensic casework and fingerprint research.
Baryah N; Krishan K; Kanchan T
Naturwissenschaften; 2023 Feb; 110(1):5. PubMed ID: 36723673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evidence evaluation in fingerprint comparison and automated fingerprint identification systems--modelling within finger variability.
Egli NM; Champod C; Margot P
Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Apr; 167(2-3):189-95. PubMed ID: 16914278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Distribution of the minutiae in the fingerprints of a sample of the Spanish population.
Gutiérrez-Redomero E; Alonso-Rodríguez C; Hernández-Hurtado LE; Rodríguez-Villalba JL
Forensic Sci Int; 2011 May; 208(1-3):79-90. PubMed ID: 21146337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative evaluation of latent fingermarks with novel enhancement and illumination.
Lanahan M; Yoda M
Sci Justice; 2021 Sep; 61(5):635-648. PubMed ID: 34482944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Introducing a semi-automatic method to simulate large numbers of forensic fingermarks for research on fingerprint identification.
Rodriguez CM; de Jongh A; Meuwly D
J Forensic Sci; 2012 Mar; 57(2):334-42. PubMed ID: 22103733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between fingerprints of the epidermis and dermis: Perspectives in the identifying of corpses.
Mizokami LL; Silva LR; Kückelhaus SA
Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Jul; 252():77-81. PubMed ID: 25965303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
