129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37724809)
41. Situational factors shape moral judgements in the trolley dilemma in Eastern, Southern and Western countries in a culturally diverse sample.
Bago B; Kovacs M; Protzko J; Nagy T; Kekecs Z; Palfi B; Adamkovic M; Adamus S; Albalooshi S; Albayrak-Aydemir N; Alfian IN; Alper S; Alvarez-Solas S; Alves SG; Amaya S; Andresen PK; Anjum G; Ansari D; Arriaga P; Aruta JJBR; Arvanitis A; Babincak P; Barzykowski K; Bashour B; Baskin E; Batalha L; Batres C; Bavolar J; Bayrak F; Becker B; Becker M; Belaus A; Białek M; Bilancini E; Boller D; Boncinelli L; Boudesseul J; Brown BT; Buchanan EM; Butt MM; Calvillo DP; Carnes NC; Celniker JB; Chartier CR; Chopik WJ; Chotikavan P; Chuan-Peng H; Clancy RF; Çoker O; Correia RC; Adoric VC; Cubillas CP; Czoschke S; Daryani Y; de Grefte JAM; de Vries WC; Burak EGD; Dias C; Dixson BJW; Du X; Dumančić F; Dumbravă A; Dutra NB; Enachescu J; Esteban-Serna C; Eudave L; Evans TR; Feldman G; Felisberti FM; Fiedler S; Findor A; Fleischmann A; Foroni F; Francová R; Frank DA; Fu CHY; Gao S; Ghasemi O; Ghazi-Noori AR; Ghossainy ME; Giammusso I; Gill T; Gjoneska B; Gollwitzer M; Graton A; Grinberg M; Groyecka-Bernard A; Harris EA; Hartanto A; Hassan WANM; Hatami J; Heimark KR; Hidding JJJ; Hristova E; Hruška M; Hudson CA; Huskey R; Ikeda A; Inbar Y; Ingram GPD; Isler O; Isloi C; Iyer A; Jaeger B; Janssen SMJ; Jiménez-Leal W; Jokić B; Kačmár P; Kadreva V; Kaminski G; Karimi-Malekabadi F; Kasper ATA; Kendrick KM; Kennedy BJ; Kocalar HE; Kodapanakkal RI; Kowal M; Kruse E; Kučerová L; Kühberger A; Kuzminska AO; Lalot F; Lamm C; Lammers J; Lange EB; Lantian A; Lau IY; Lazarevic LB; Leliveld MC; Lenz JN; Levitan CA; Lewis SC; Li M; Li Y; Li H; Lima TJS; Lins S; Liuzza MT; Lopes P; Lu JG; Lynds T; Máčel M; Mackinnon SP; Maganti M; Magraw-Mickelson Z; Magson LF; Manley H; Marcu GM; Seršić DM; Matibag CJ; Mattiassi ADA; Mazidi M; McFall JP; McLatchie N; Mensink MC; Miketta L; Milfont TL; Mirisola A; Misiak M; Mitkidis P; Moeini-Jazani M; Monajem A; Moreau D; Musser ED; Narhetali E; Ochoa DP; Olsen J; Owsley NC; Özdoğru AA; Panning M; Papadatou-Pastou M; Parashar N; Pärnamets P; Paruzel-Czachura M; Parzuchowski M; Paterlini JV; Pavlacic JM; Peker M; Peters K; Piatnitckaia L; Pinto I; Policarpio MR; Pop-Jordanova N; Pratama AJ; Primbs MA; Pronizius E; Purić D; Puvia E; Qamari V; Qian K; Quiamzade A; Ráczová B; Reinero DA; Reips UD; Reyna C; Reynolds K; Ribeiro MFF; Röer JP; Ross RM; Roussos P; Ruiz-Dodobara F; Ruiz-Fernandez S; Rutjens BT; Rybus K; Samekin A; Santos AC; Say N; Schild C; Schmidt K; Ścigała KA; Sharifian M; Shi J; Shi Y; Sievers E; Sirota M; Slipenkyj M; Solak Ç; Sorokowska A; Sorokowski P; Söylemez S; Steffens NK; Stephen ID; Sternisko A; Stevens-Wilson L; Stewart SLK; Stieger S; Storage D; Strube J; Susa KJ; Szekely-Copîndean RD; Szostak NM; Takwin B; Tatachari S; Thomas AG; Tiede KE; Tiong LE; Tonković M; Trémolière B; Tunstead LV; Türkan BN; Twardawski M; Vadillo MA; Vally Z; Vaughn LA; Verschuere B; Vlašiček D; Voracek M; Vranka MA; Wang S; West SL; Whyte S; Wilton LS; Wlodarczyk A; Wu X; Xin F; Yadanar S; Yama H; Yamada Y; Yilmaz O; Yoon S; Young DM; Zakharov I; Zein RA; Zettler I; Žeželj IL; Zhang DC; Zhang J; Zheng X; Hoekstra R; Aczel B
Nat Hum Behav; 2022 Jun; 6(6):880-895. PubMed ID: 35422529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Contingencies of self-worth and the strength of deontological and utilitarian inclinations.
Macko A
J Soc Psychol; 2021 Nov; 161(6):664-682. PubMed ID: 33357143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Are 'counter-intuitive' deontological judgments really counter-intuitive? An empirical reply to.
Paxton JM; Bruni T; Greene JD
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2014 Sep; 9(9):1368-71. PubMed ID: 23887818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment.
Greene JD; Nystrom LE; Engell AD; Darley JM; Cohen JD
Neuron; 2004 Oct; 44(2):389-400. PubMed ID: 15473975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Sidetracked by trolleys: Why sacrificial moral dilemmas tell us little (or nothing) about utilitarian judgment.
Kahane G
Soc Neurosci; 2015; 10(5):551-60. PubMed ID: 25791902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Many heads are more utilitarian than one.
Keshmirian A; Deroy O; Bahrami B
Cognition; 2022 Mar; 220():104965. PubMed ID: 34872034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Hippocampal Damage Increases Deontological Responses during Moral Decision Making.
McCormick C; Rosenthal CR; Miller TD; Maguire EA
J Neurosci; 2016 Nov; 36(48):12157-12167. PubMed ID: 27903725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The role of emotions for moral judgments depends on the type of emotion and moral scenario.
Ugazio G; Lamm C; Singer T
Emotion; 2012 Jun; 12(3):579-90. PubMed ID: 21859189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Why People with More Emotion Regulation Difficulties Made a More Deontological Judgment: The Role of Deontological Inclinations.
Zhang L; Li Z; Wu X; Zhang Z
Front Psychol; 2017; 8():2095. PubMed ID: 29234299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Trust in Autonomous Cars: Exploring the Role of Shared Moral Values, Reasoning, and Emotion in Safety-Critical Decisions.
Yokoi R; Nakayachi K
Hum Factors; 2021 Dec; 63(8):1465-1484. PubMed ID: 32663047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The Causal Role of Right Frontopolar Cortex in Moral Judgment, Negative Emotion Induction, and Executive Control.
Ziaei M; Togha M; Rahimian E; Persson J
Basic Clin Neurosci; 2019; 10(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 31031892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Moral judgements reflect default representations of possibility.
Acierno J; Mischel S; Phillips J
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2022 Dec; 377(1866):20210341. PubMed ID: 36314154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Fear facilitates utilitarian moral judgments: Evidence from a moral judgment task.
Tao Y; Dong J; Niu H; Lv Y; He X; Zhang S; Liu X
Psych J; 2023 Oct; 12(5):680-689. PubMed ID: 37454678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The effects of explicit reasoning on moral judgements.
Corral D; Rutchick AM
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Apr; 77(4):828-845. PubMed ID: 37211652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Are thoughtful people more utilitarian? CRT as a unique predictor of moral minimalism in the dilemmatic context.
Royzman EB; Landy JF; Leeman RF
Cogn Sci; 2015 Mar; 39(2):325-52. PubMed ID: 24976510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The drunk utilitarian: blood alcohol concentration predicts utilitarian responses in moral dilemmas.
Duke AA; Bègue L
Cognition; 2015 Jan; 134():121-7. PubMed ID: 25460385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. At the heart of morality lies neuro-visceral integration: lower cardiac vagal tone predicts utilitarian moral judgment.
Park G; Kappes A; Rho Y; Van Bavel JJ
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 11(10):1588-96. PubMed ID: 27317926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Activation of brain areas concerned with social cognition during moral decisions is abnormal in schizophrenia patients and unaffected siblings.
de Achával D; Villarreal MF; Salles A; Bertomeu MJ; Costanzo EY; Goldschmidt M; Castro MN; van der Poel I; Nemeroff CB; Guinjoan SM
J Psychiatr Res; 2013 Jun; 47(6):774-82. PubMed ID: 23403281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Outcome-focused judgements of moral dilemmas in schizophrenia.
McGuire J; Brüne M; Langdon R
Conscious Cogn; 2017 Jul; 52():21-31. PubMed ID: 28454059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The effect of analytic and experiential modes of thought on moral judgment.
Kvaran T; Nichols S; Sanfey A
Prog Brain Res; 2013; 202():187-96. PubMed ID: 23317833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
