These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3772540)

  • 1. Using audiometric data base analysis.
    Royster JD; Royster LH
    J Occup Med; 1986 Oct; 28(10):1055-68. PubMed ID: 3772540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hearing conservation programs (HCPs): the effectiveness of one company's HCP in a 12-hr work shift environment.
    Reynolds JL; Royster LH; Pearson RG
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1990 Aug; 51(8):437-46. PubMed ID: 2392973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The otolaryngologist and hearing protectors.
    Alberti PW; Riko K
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1984 Nov; 17(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 6514358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The performance of circumaural hearing protectors by dosimetry.
    Chung DY; Hardie R; Gannon RP
    J Occup Med; 1983 Sep; 25(9):679-82. PubMed ID: 6631567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Group mean hearing threshold changes in a noise-exposed industrial population using personal hearing protectors.
    Savell JF; Toothman EH
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Jan; 48(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 3565259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The contribution of focus groups in the evaluation of hearing conservation program (HCP) effectiveness.
    Prince MM; Colligan MJ; Stephenson CM; Bischoff BJ
    J Safety Res; 2004; 35(1):91-106. PubMed ID: 14992850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Noise-induced hearing loss and hearing protective devices.
    Abel SM
    Can J Public Health; 1986; 77 Suppl 1():104-7. PubMed ID: 3742410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Attenuation efficiency of hearing protectors for workers exposed to noise].
    Murakami M; Hirota Y; Ohwada H; Kanemitsu K
    Sangyo Igaku; 1984 Mar; 26(2):178-9. PubMed ID: 6503014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effectiveness of hearing protectors in practice.
    Alberti PW; Riko K; Abel SM; Kristensen R
    J Otolaryngol; 1979 Aug; 8(4):354-9. PubMed ID: 513182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New draft ANSI standard enhances efforts in hearing conservation.
    Royster JD; Royster LH
    Occup Health Saf; 1991 Oct; 60(10):86, 89-90. PubMed ID: 1945236
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An evaluation of the effectiveness of three hearing protection devices at an industrial facility with a TWA of 107 dB.
    Royster LH; Royster JD; Cecich TF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Aug; 76(2):485-97. PubMed ID: 6480999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Evaluation of and trends in hearing surveillance programs in industry].
    Malchaire J
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1988; 42(4):529-37. PubMed ID: 3218500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effectiveness of hearing protective devices.
    Gosztonyi RE
    J Occup Med; 1975 Sep; 17(9):569-80. PubMed ID: 1165499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An epidemiologic method for assessing the effectiveness of hearing conservation programs using audiometric data.
    Adera T; Donahue AM; Malit BD; Gaydos JC
    Mil Med; 1993 Nov; 158(11):698-701. PubMed ID: 8284053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Real-ear attenuation of earmuffs in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired individuals.
    Suter AH; Lempert BL; Franks JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 May; 87(5):2114-7. PubMed ID: 2348018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of audiometric threshold step size on proposed ANSI S12.13 outcomes for characterizing hearing conservation program effectiveness.
    Simpson TH; Stewart M; Kaltenbach JA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 Jul; 4(4):258-63. PubMed ID: 8369543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of the proposed Draft American National Standard method for evaluating the effectiveness of hearing conservation programs.
    Adera T; Donahue AM; Malit BD; Gaydos JC
    J Occup Med; 1993 Jun; 35(6):568-73. PubMed ID: 8331436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Studies on the noise-insulating properties of cotton wool from Lauscha under normal working conditions].
    Müller W; Richartz G
    Z Gesamte Hyg; 1979 Feb; 25(2):118-20. PubMed ID: 433339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relative ear protector performance in high vs low sound levels.
    Thunder TD; Lankford JE
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1979 Dec; 40(12):1023-9. PubMed ID: 539542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is your hearing really safe?
    Connor D
    Occup Health (Lond); 1991 Oct; 43(10):300, 302. PubMed ID: 1775278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.