These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3772548)

  • 1. Discriminatory aspects of medical screening.
    Rothstein MA
    J Occup Med; 1986 Oct; 28(10):924-9. PubMed ID: 3772548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Medical surveillance of employees under the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
    Mintz BW
    J Occup Med; 1986 Oct; 28(10):913-20. PubMed ID: 3772547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biological monitoring in the workplace: ethical issues.
    Bayer R
    J Occup Med; 1986 Oct; 28(10):935-9. PubMed ID: 3772550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Employment discrimination implications of genetic screening in the workplace under Title VII and the Rehabilitation Act.
    Canter EF
    Am J Law Med; 1984; 10(3):323-47. PubMed ID: 6534190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ethical concerns in occupational screening programs.
    Lappé MA
    J Occup Med; 1986 Oct; 28(10):930-4. PubMed ID: 3772549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomedical surveillance: rights conflict with rights.
    Atherley G; Johnston N; Tennassee M
    J Occup Med; 1986 Oct; 28(10):958-65. PubMed ID: 3772552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetic testing in the workplace.
    Rowinski L
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1988; 4():375-413. PubMed ID: 11645613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Keeping health-care workers healthy. Legal aspects of hepatitis B immunization programs.
    Baker CH; Brennan JM
    N Engl J Med; 1984 Sep; 311(10):684-8. PubMed ID: 6236368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prenatal exposure to fetally toxic work environments: the dilemma of the 1978 Pregnancy Amendment to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
    Furnish HA
    Iowa Law Rev; 1980 Oct; 66(1):63-129. PubMed ID: 11661992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Local government workers' health and safety programs.
    Albers J
    Occup Med; 2001; 16(1):79-99. PubMed ID: 11107226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marijuana in the Workplace: Guidance for Occupational Health Professionals and Employers: Joint Guidance Statement of the American Association of Occupational Health Nurses and the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.
    Phillips JA; Holland MG; Baldwin DD; Gifford-Meuleveld L; Mueller KL; Perkison B; Upfal M; Dreger M
    Workplace Health Saf; 2015 Apr; 63(4):139-64. PubMed ID: 25862727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The new OSHA rules and the worker's right to know.
    McGarity TO
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Aug; 14(4):38-45. PubMed ID: 6237075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Occupational health values in the Supreme Court: cost-benefit analysis.
    Curran WJ; Boden LI
    Am J Public Health; 1981 Nov; 71(11):1264-5. PubMed ID: 6794378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Civil rights in a changing health care system.
    Rosenbaum S; Serrano R; Magar M; Stern G
    Health Aff (Millwood); 1997; 16(1):90-105. PubMed ID: 9018947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screening and monitoring data as evidence in legal proceedings.
    Field RI; Baram MS
    J Occup Med; 1986 Oct; 28(10):946-50. PubMed ID: 2945912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Screening and surveillance. OSHA's medical surveillance provisions.
    Papp EM; Miller AS
    AAOHN J; 2000 Feb; 48(2):59-72. PubMed ID: 10865548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The right of access of the medically underserved to health care services.
    Brandin PA
    J Leg Med; 1981 Sep; 2(3):297-345. PubMed ID: 6976402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Oregon Death with Dignity Act: a successful model or a legal anomaly vulnerable to attack?
    Boyle B
    Houst Law Rev; 2004; 40(5):1387-421. PubMed ID: 16189902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Krauel v. Iowa Methodist Medical Center.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1996 Sep; 95():674-81. PubMed ID: 11648315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Civil rights and regulatory wrongs: the Reagan administration and the medical treatment of handicapped infants.
    Brown LD
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1986; 11(2):231-54. PubMed ID: 3745838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.